[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-583444-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-583444-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","fsse-2014-overview-institutions-and-respondents","FSSE 2014 Overview - Institutions and Respondents","","FSSE 2014 Overview describes the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) as a companion to NSSE, measuring faculty members’ expectations about empirically linked educational practices that support high learning and development. It summarizes how FSSE collects information on faculty time spent in teaching and scholarship, and on emphasized undergraduate learning experiences. The overview explains how institutions can use FSSE results, compares participating institutions and respondents with NSSE and U.S. profiles, and provides guidance and resources for using and interpreting findings.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fsse-2014-overview-institutions-and-respondents/583444/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fsse-2014-overview-institutions-and-respondents/583444.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jake","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of FSSE 2014?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"FSSE 2014 measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices empirically linked to high learning and development. It also gathers information about how faculty spend their time on teaching and scholarship-related activities and the learning experiences emphasized by their institutions.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How were FSSE 2014 faculty respondents selected and invited?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Participating institutions selected their own faculty samples and sent email invitations requesting faculty to respond to the online survey. In 2014, 18,860 faculty responded from 143 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How can institutions use FSSE 2014 results?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"FSSE results can help identify institutional strengths and aspects of the undergraduate experience that may need attention. The information supports productive discussions about teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},583444,1792161248,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":55,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","FSSE 2014 Overview  \nThe Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) complements the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and is coordinated by the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. FSSE (pronounced “fessie”) measures faculty members’expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are empirically linked with high levels of learning and development. The survey also collects information about how faculty members spend their time on professorial activities, such as teaching and scholarship, and the kinds of learning experiences their institutions emphasize.  \nFSSE results can be used to identify areas of institutional strength, as well as aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The information can be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students’educational experiences.  \nThis overview provides general information about the institutions and faculty members that participated in the 2014 administration ofFSSE, and highlights ways institutions can use their results. In the first section, we compare the characteristics ofFSSE participating institutions to those of NSSE participating institutions and those of the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting institutions. We also compare the characteristics ofFSSE respondents to those of faculty members at U.S. bachelor’s-granting institutions and provide general information about response rates. In the second section, we provide guidelines for using and interpreting FSSE 2014 results, and highlight resources for analyzing and presenting FSSE findings. Resources intended to help with the use ofFSSE data are also on the FSSE Web site.  \nFSSE 2014 Institutions and Respondents  \nIn the 2014 administration ofFSSE, 18,860 faculty members responded from 143 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities (139 U.S., 3 Canadian, and 1 American university abroad) that selected their own faculty samples. Faculty members at participating institutions were sent email invitations asking them to respond to the online survey. Nearly all FSSE institutions (136) also administered NSSE to their students in 2014; 7 had used NSSE in a previous year. Having recent data from NSSE allows participating  \ninstitutions to examine how faculty members and students respond to similar questions. Each campus receives electronic copies of its reports and data file, along with a list of participating institutions. The list is also publicly available through the FSSE Web site.  \nFor the FSSE 2014 administration, institutions were able to add topical modules and consortium items to the end of the core FSSE instrument. This year, the module on Academic Advising was appended by 48 institutions, Learning with Technology by 22, Development of Transferable Skills by 20, Civic Engagement by 14, Experiences with Writing by 12, Experiences with Diverse Perspectives by 11, and Scholarship of Teaching and Learning by 10; and 18 institutions appended consortium items. Institutions could append as many as two modules or a module anda set of consortium items.  \nTables 1 through 3 on the following pages provide more information about the participating institutions and faculty members who responded to the survey. While included here and in each institution’s FSSE 2014 Respondent Profile, certain demographics (e.g., gender, rank, and employment status) were withheld from each institution’s data file to ensure that responses remain anonymous.  \nUniversity of Tennessee at Martin  \nProfile of FSSE 2014 Institutions  \nThe FSSE 2014 institutions were similar in many ways to the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities (Table 1) . Like NSSE 2014, however, there are a few places, noted below, where the FSSE 2014 profile differed slightly from the U.S. profile. While these differences exist between the profiles, the distribution of FSSE 2014 institutions reflects a wide range of U.S. institutions, which helps en","cbCaig7Rgn6jg67C","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaig7Rgn6jg67C","pdf",1436268,"English","# FSSE 2014 Overview\n## FSSE 2014 Institutions and Respondents\n## Profile of FSSE 2014 Institutions\n## Table 1: Profile of FSSE and NSSE 2014 U.S. Institutions","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of FSSE 2014?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE 2014 measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices empirically linked to high learning and development. It also gathers information about how faculty spend their time on teaching and scholarship-related activities and the learning experiences emphasized by their institutions.\"},{\"question\":\"How were FSSE 2014 faculty respondents selected and invited?\",\"answer\":\"Participating institutions selected their own faculty samples and sent email invitations requesting faculty to respond to the online survey. In 2014, 18,860 faculty responded from 143 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities.\"},{\"question\":\"How can institutions use FSSE 2014 results?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE results can help identify institutional strengths and aspects of the undergraduate experience that may need attention. The information supports productive discussions about teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.\"}]","FSSE 2014 Overview - Institutions and Respondents | PDF",1792047254,13]