[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-583443-105":59,"doc-detail-583443-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","fsse-2012-overview-faculty-survey-of-student-engagement","FSSE 2012 Overview - Faculty Survey of Student Engagement","","FSSE (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement) complements NSSE by assessing faculty members’ expectations for student engagement in educational practices linked to learning and development. It also gathers information on how faculty allocate time to teaching and scholarship and on the learning experiences institutions emphasize. The overview summarizes the 2012 participating institutions and faculty respondent profile, compares key characteristics to U.S. benchmarks, reports response-rate context, and provides guidance for using and interpreting FSSE 2012 results.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fsse-2012-overview-faculty-survey-of-student-engagement/583443/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fsse-2012-overview-faculty-survey-of-student-engagement/583443.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does FSSE measure and how does it complement NSSE?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"FSSE measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in empirically linked educational practices. It complements NSSE by collecting faculty-focused information while institutions also use NSSE with students for related comparisons.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How were faculty invited to participate in FSSE 2012?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Participating institutions emailed faculty invitations to respond to an online survey. Institutions selected either course-based or typical-student question options.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What guidance does the FSSE 2012 Overview provide?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The overview explains how institutions can use and interpret FSSE 2012 results. It includes guidelines for using the data, describing response-rate context, and highlighting resources for analyzing and presenting findings.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},583443,1792166364,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":29,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) complements the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and is coordinated by the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. FSSE (pronounced‘fessie’) measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are empirically linked with high levels of learning and development. The survey also collects information about how faculty members spend their time on professorial activities, such as teaching and scholarship, and the kinds of learning experiences their institutions emphasize.  \nFSSE results can be used to identify areas of institutional strength, as well as aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The information can be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students’educational experiences.  \nThis Overview provides general information about the institutions and faculty members that participated in the 2012 administration ofFSSE, and highlights ways institutions can use their results. The Overview is divided into two sections. First, we compare the characteristics of participating institutions and faculty members with U.S. profiles as well as provide general information about response rates. In the second section, we provide guidelines for using and interpreting FSSE 2012 results, and highlight resources for analyzing and presenting FSSE findings. Resources intended to help with the use and interpretation ofFSSE data are also available on the FSSE Web site.  \nFSSE 2012 Institutions and Respondents  \nIn 2012, 15,148 faculty responded from 117 bachelor’sgranting colleges and universities (116 U.S. and 1 Canadian) that selected their own faculty samples.  \nFaculty members at participating institutions were sent invitation emails and asked to respond to the online survey. Institutions chose one of two survey options, with either “course-based” or “typical-student” questions. Of the 2012 participating institutions, 64%(75) administered course-based questions to their faculties and 36%(42) administered typical-student questions. Nearly all (107)  \nFSSE 2012 Overview  \nof these institutions also administered NSSE to their students in 2012; 10 used NSSE in a previous year. Having recent data from NSSE allows participating institutions to examine how faculty members and students respond to similar questions. Each campus receives electronic copies of its reports and data file, along with a list of participating institutions. The list is also publicly available through the FSSE Web site.  \nTables 1 and 2 on the following pages provide more information about the participating institutions and faculty members who responded to the survey. While included here and in each institution’s FSSE 2012 Respondent Characteristics, certain demographics (e.g., gender,  \nrank, and employment status) are withheld from each institution’s data file to ensure that responses remain anonymous.  \nProfile of FSSE 2012  \nInstitutions  \nThe FSSE 2012 institutions are similar in many ways to the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities (Table 1) . Based on the 2010 Basic Carnegie Classification, the distribution ofFSSE institutions mirrors that of all U.S. bachelor’s-granting institutions. In addition, FSSE institutions mirror the U. S. distribution in terms of location in cities, towns, and rural areas.  \nLike NSSE 2012, there are a few places where the FSSE 2012 profile differs slightly from the U.S. profile. For  \nMethodist University  \nFSSE 2012 OVERVIEW 1  \nTable 1  \nProfile of U.S. FSSE and NSSE 2012 Institutions Against All U.S. Bachelor’sGranting Institutionsa  \n\n|  | FSSE 2012 | NSSE 2012 | USb |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Carnegie Classification – Basic 2010c |  |  |  |\n| RU/VH | 2% | 4% | 6% |\n| RU/H | 13% | 9% | 6% |\n| DRU | 6% | 5% | 5% |\n| Master’s L | 27% | 30% | 25% |\n| Master’s M | 11% | 12% | 11% |\n| Master’s S | 8% | 7% | 8% |\n| Bac/A&S | 15% | 16","cbCairWs6VR8AyYm","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairWs6VR8AyYm","pdf",3745712,"English","# FSSE and NSSE Overview\n## Purpose and data collection\n# FSSE 2012 Institutions and Respondents\n## Response counts and survey options\n## NSSE administration context\n# Profile of FSSE 2012 Institutions\n## Comparison with U.S. profiles\n## Carnegie classification, sector, enrollment, region, and location\n# Confidentiality and respondent characteristics","[{\"question\":\"What does FSSE measure and how does it complement NSSE?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in empirically linked educational practices. It complements NSSE by collecting faculty-focused information while institutions also use NSSE with students for related comparisons.\"},{\"question\":\"How were faculty invited to participate in FSSE 2012?\",\"answer\":\"Participating institutions emailed faculty invitations to respond to an online survey. Institutions selected either course-based or typical-student question options.\"},{\"question\":\"What guidance does the FSSE 2012 Overview provide?\",\"answer\":\"The overview explains how institutions can use and interpret FSSE 2012 results. It includes guidelines for using the data, describing response-rate context, and highlighting resources for analyzing and presenting findings.\"}]","FSSE 2012 Overview - Faculty Survey of Student Engagement | PDF",1792047251,15]