[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-136587-105":59,"doc-detail-136587-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","friends-with-benefits-gendered-performances-in-womens-casual-sexual-relationships-fahs-and-munger-2015","Friends with Benefits? Gendered Performances in Women’s Casual Sexual Relationships - Fahs and Munger (2015)","","Although research has examined “friends with benefits” relationships, women’s subjective experiences remain underexplored. Using attachment theory, scripting theory, and social constructionist views of gender, the study draws on qualitative interviews with 20 women (M age = 34, SD = 13.35) from diverse racial, age, and sexual identity backgrounds. Five themes emerge: managing and suppressing emotions; performing detachment and emotionlessness; unclear communication and “other-defined” experiences; reproduction of racist and sexist scripts; and transitional aspects of the relationship. Findings address power differences and tensions between subverting and reinforcing scripts.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/friends-with-benefits-gendered-performances-in-womens-casual-sexual-relationships-fahs-and-munger-2015/136587/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/friends-with-benefits-gendered-performances-in-womens-casual-sexual-relationships-fahs-and-munger-2015/136587.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aditya","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-18","2026-08-22",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What research gap does the study address about friends with benefits relationships?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It addresses the limited focus on women’s subjective accounts of friends with benefits relationships, which remains notably understudied despite prior research using other methods.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which theories are used to interpret women’s narratives in the study?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The study uses attachment theory, social scripting theory, and social constructionist theories of gender to analyze qualitative interview data.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What five themes are identified in women’s friends-with-benefits narratives?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The themes are emotion regulation and suppression; performance and idealization of detachment/emotionlessness; lack of clear communication plus “other-defined” experiences; replication of racist and sexist scripts; and transitional qualities of the relationship.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},136587,1787389517,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":36},962085564549,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Personal Relationships, 22 (2015), 188–203 . Printed in the United States of America. Copyright © 2015 IARR; DOI: 10.1111/pere.12073  \nFriends with benefits? Gendered performances in women’s casual sexual relationships  \nBREANNE FAHS AND ADRIELLE MUNGER Arizona State University  \nAbstract  \nAlthough some research has examined “friends with benefits” relationships (FWBRs), women’s subjective accounts of FWBRs remains notably understudied. Utilizing attachment theory, scripting theory, and social constructionist theories of gender, this study drew upon qualitative interviews with a community sample of 20 women (mean age = 34,  \nSD = 13.35) from diverse ages, races, and sexual identity backgrounds to illuminate five themes in women’s FWBR narratives: (a) regulation and suppression of emotions,(b) performance and idealization of detachment and emotionlessness,(c) lack of clear communication combined with “other-defined” experiences,(d) replication of racist and sexist scripts, and (e) transitional qualities of the relationship. Implications for the power differentials present in FWBRs, and tensions between subverting and further entrenching relationship scripts, are explored.  \nBoth popular media and scholarly research have shown an interest in “friends with benefits” relationships (FWBRs)—that is, friendships that involve sexual activity—in the past several years. In tandem with declining rates of monogamy and marriage (Amato, 2004), women’s casual sexual relationships have developed a more prominent place in our cultural and social landscape. Celebrations of“single life” and the benefits of sex without attachment have risen up as potential avenues to empowerment and agency for women. As a fusion between casual and committed relationships, FWBRs signify the fundamental fluidity of romantic and sexual connections. Recently, scholars have started to examine, primarily using quantitative methods, how many people  \nBreanne Fahs, Women and Gender Studies Program, Arizona State University, Glendale; Adrielle Munger, Women and Gender Studies Program, Arizona State University, Glendale.  \nSpecial thanks to Eric Swank and the Feminist Research on Gender and Sexuality Group for their contributions to this manuscript.  \nCorrespondence should be addressed to Breanne Fahs, Arizona State University, Women and Gender Studies Program, 4701 W. Thunderbird Road, Glendale, AZ 85306, [e-mail: breanne.fahs@asu.edu](e-mail: breanne.fahs@asu.edu).  \nengage in FWBRs, why they do so, and who they talk to about them (Bisson & Levine, 2009; Grello, Welsh, & Harper, 2006; Hughes, Morrison, & Asada, 2005; Puentes, Knox,& Zusman, 2008; VanderDrift, Lehmiller, & Kelly, 2012; Wentland & Reissing, 2011) . Still, few studies have targeted women’s subjective feelings and narratives about FWBRs, leaving a notable gap in the existing literatures that this study seeks to address.  \nAlthough an examination of FWBRs might lend itself most closely to a study of women’s friendship patterns—as women often “evolve”a friendship (with either men or women) into an FWBR—we argue that the way women talk about FWBRs reveals more about the intersections between sociological and psychological scripts about gender, race, and power. The scant amount of research on women’s experiences with FWBRs—particularly their subjective accounts of these engagements across a diverse sample of ages and including heterosexual, bisexual, and lesbian participants—suggests relevant inroads fora feminist analysis and new possibilities for uniting relationship research, feminist theory, and qualitative psychology.  \nFriends with benefits 189  \nMore specifically, this study drew from three theoretical frameworks—social constructionist theories of gender (Butler, 1990; Glenn, 1999; Lorber, 1994; Tiefer, 2004), social scripting theory (Muraco, 2012; Simon & Gagnon, 1986; Wiederman, 2005), and attachment theory (Bretherton, 1992; Fraley & Shaver, 2000)—to examine qualitative narratives from 20 women with d","cbCaikA0H68Gg6ZT","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikA0H68Gg6ZT","pdf",145128,16,"English","# Abstract\n## Research aim and theoretical frameworks\n## Methods and participant characteristics\n## Five narrative themes\n## Implications for power and gendered scripts","[{\"question\":\"What research gap does the study address about friends with benefits relationships?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses the limited focus on women’s subjective accounts of friends with benefits relationships, which remains notably understudied despite prior research using other methods.\"},{\"question\":\"Which theories are used to interpret women’s narratives in the study?\",\"answer\":\"The study uses attachment theory, social scripting theory, and social constructionist theories of gender to analyze qualitative interview data.\"},{\"question\":\"What five themes are identified in women’s friends-with-benefits narratives?\",\"answer\":\"The themes are emotion regulation and suppression; performance and idealization of detachment/emotionlessness; lack of clear communication plus “other-defined” experiences; replication of racist and sexist scripts; and transitional qualities of the relationship.\"}]","Friends with Benefits? Gendered Performances in Women’s Casual Sexual Relationships - Fahs and Munger (2015) | PDF"]