[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-598437-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-598437-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","frequent-limits-and-advantages-of-conditions-for-geology-education-example-of-czech-and-slovak-state-curricula","Frequent Limits and Advantages of Conditions for Geology Education - Example of Czech and Slovak State Curricula","","Geology education attracts low interest from many pupils and teachers. This study examines organizational conditions for teaching geology using Czech and Slovak national curricula, addressing why the field is unpopular worldwide and proposing general recommendations to raise interest in geoscience. Reported drawbacks include the large volume of required knowledge, fragmented thematic structure, and limited connection to real life. The Czech curriculum is described as vague and theoretical with weak emphasis on recommended teaching methods, while the Slovak curriculum better reflects current trends.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/frequent-limits-and-advantages-of-conditions-for-geology-education-example-of-czech-and-slovak-state-curricula/598437/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/frequent-limits-and-advantages-of-conditions-for-geology-education-example-of-czech-and-slovak-state-curricula/598437.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"A glass of water","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-05","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What problem does the study focus on regarding geology education?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It focuses on the low interest in geology among many pupils and teachers and investigates the organizational conditions behind this challenge.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How do the Czech and Slovak curricula differ in the study?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The Czech curriculum is described as vague and theoretical with heavy demands on memorization and little attention to recommended teaching methods, while the Slovak curriculum better aligns with current trends.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What recommendations does the study propose to improve geology teaching?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It recommends continuous educational support for geology teachers, restructuring the geology syllabus so sub-fields are interconnected, and defining learning outcomes with action-based education, fieldwork, and experimenting.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},598437,1792170976,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090760832,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","DOI: [https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1449](https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1449)  \nFrequent Limits and Advantages of Conditions for Geology Education: Example of Czech and Slovak State Curricula  \nTereza Jedličková*1, Andrea Svobodová2 and Václav Kachlík2  \n• Geology is a subject of low interest for many pupils and teachers. The present study aims at examining the organizational conditions for geology education using the model of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, drawing from the national curricula. The study discusses the possible reasons for the unpopularity of the field worldwide and proposes general recommendations that would contribute to increasing interest in geoscience. The main drawbacks of geology education seem to be the large volume of required knowledge, its thematic structure, and a lack of links to real life. The Czech curriculum is vaguely and theoretically defined, placing demand on pupils, especially in the area of memorizing given information and practically pays no attention to recommended teaching methods. In contrast, the Slovak curriculum better reflects current trends. In general, it is necessary to implement continuous educational support for geology teachers and restructure the geology syllabus so that individual sub-fields are interlinked. Moreover, the learning outcome definition should include action-based education, fieldwork, experimenting, and similar elements.  \nKeywords: content analysis, ISCED 2, geology education, geology syllabus, national curriculum  \n1 *Corresponding Author. Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; [tereza.jedlickova@natur.cuni.cz](tereza.jedlickova@natur.cuni.cz).  \n2 Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.  \nPogoste omejitve in prednosti pogojev za izobraževanjeo geologiji: primer češkega in slovaškega nacionalnegaučnega načrta  \nTereza Jedličková, Andrea Svobodová in Václav Kachlík  \n• Geologija je področje, za katero ima veliko učencev in učiteljev nizko raven zanimanja. Namen te študije je preučiti organizacijske pogoje zaizobraževanje o geologiji na primeru Češke in Slovaške, pri čemer sesklicujemo na nacionalne učne načrte obeh držav. Študija obravnava mogoče razloge za nepriljubljenost tega področja v svetu in predlagasplošna priporočila, ki bi prispevala k povečanju zanimanja za geoznanost. Zdi se, da so glavne pomanjkljivosti izobraževanja o geologijivelika količina zahtevanega znanja, njegova tematska struktura in pomanjkanje povezav z resničnim življenjem. Češki učni načrt je ohlapno in teoretično opredeljen; pred učence postavlja veliko zahtev, zlasti na področju pomnjenja podanih informacij, in dejansko ne posveča pozornosti priporočenim učnim metodam. Nasprotno pa slovaški učni načrt bolje odraža trenutne smernice. Na splošno bi bilo treba izvajati stalnoizobraževalno podporo učiteljem geologije in prestrukturirati učni načrt za geologijo, tako da bi bila posamezna podpodročja med seboj povezana. Poleg tega bi morala opredelitev učnih izidov vključevati izobraževanje skozi gibanje, terensko delo, eksperimentiranje in podobne oblike izobraževanja.  \nKljučne besede: vsebinska analiza, ISCED-2, izobraževanje o geologiji, učni načrt za geologijo, nacionalni učni načrt  \nIntroduction  \nAs an elementary natural science, geology represents a genuine link between other natural sciences, such as biology, geography, chemistry, and physics. It has the largest base of elementary and applied scientific disciplines (Pyle, 2008) . The importance of geology education does not lie merely in acquiring knowledge of minerals, the Earth’s history, the evolution of life, and practical disciplines. Currently, its rising value is concentrated in an interdisciplinary and integrated study of global exo- and endogenous processes that help to better understand the large natural catastrophes (e.g., earthquakes, tsunamis, volcano eruptions, landslides) as well as re","cbCaidCbnMJPkzKV","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidCbnMJPkzKV","pdf",182793,22,"English","# Introduction\n## Geology education in Europe\n# Organizational conditions and curriculum comparison\n## Reported drawbacks and reasons for unpopularity\n## Recommendations for improvement","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the study focus on regarding geology education?\",\"answer\":\"It focuses on the low interest in geology among many pupils and teachers and investigates the organizational conditions behind this challenge.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the Czech and Slovak curricula differ in the study?\",\"answer\":\"The Czech curriculum is described as vague and theoretical with heavy demands on memorization and little attention to recommended teaching methods, while the Slovak curriculum better aligns with current trends.\"},{\"question\":\"What recommendations does the study propose to improve geology teaching?\",\"answer\":\"It recommends continuous educational support for geology teachers, restructuring the geology syllabus so sub-fields are interconnected, and defining learning outcomes with action-based education, fieldwork, and experimenting.\"}]","Frequent Limits and Advantages of Conditions for Geology Education - Example of Czech and Slovak State Curricula | PDF",1792086929,55]