[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-265923-105":59,"doc-detail-265923-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","final-internal-assessment-methodology-tasc-january-2025","Final Internal Assessment Methodology - TASC - January 2025","","Guidance explains how teachers determine final internal ratings using TASC’s criterion-based assessment methodology. It clarifies required annual reporting of final internal ratings during Term 4, the role of teachers’ written final assessment statements for record accessibility, and the need for transparency so students understand how final ratings are formed. It details key principles: relative weighting of tasks, reflecting learning endpoints, consistency of achievement, and ensuring validity and reliability through task conditions and supervision.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/final-internal-assessment-methodology-tasc-january-2025/265923/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/final-internal-assessment-methodology-tasc-january-2025/265923.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Ben Jamin","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-09-14",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Why does TASC require a written final internal assessment statement as part of assessment records?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It ensures that if a teacher is absent during the final reporting period, others can access the records and make comparable final internal judgements. This supports fairness and consistency in final ratings.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What does the methodology say about how final judgements should use assessment tasks?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Final judgements consider the relative weight and significance of each task, including differences in time, complexity, learning scope, and whether tasks are formative or summative.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"How should teachers account for endpoints and not average results across the year?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Final judgements should not be based on averaging. Endpoints require clear notations in the assessment record, such as dates of judgement and whether achievements represent endpoint attainment.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},265923,1790411945,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":14,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":24},2336478466772,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","Think  \nFinal Internal Assessment Methodology  \nWhile the basic concepts of finalising assessments are discussed in the TASC Determining Final Ratings information sheet, this ‘Final Internal Assessment Methodology’ sheet provides a more detailed explanation to assist teachers in determining internal ratings.  \nDiscuss  \nEach year in Term 4, TASC provider schools are required to report final  \ninternal ratings on each course criterion to TASC. This is done by each course teacher. The reporting period is consistent each year and ensures adequate time before the release of  \nDo  \nstudent results. The ‘rules’ or ‘considerations’ teachers use to bring together the various assessment judgements made over the year for each criterion is the final internal assessment methodology.  \nTASC expects that a written final internal assessment statement will be part of assessment records so that if a teacher is absent during the final reporting period, others can access the records and make final internal assessment judgements comparable with those the teacher would have made. Without this, students can be unfairly disadvantaged (or advantaged) . To ensure transparency in the process, students should also be aware of how their final ratings have been determined.  \nIt is useful to consider how the principles of criterion-based assessment impact final assessment judgements:  \n\n| Principles of Final Assessment Judgements | Comments | Questions for teachers to consider |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Consider the\u003Cbr>relative\u003Cbr>weight/significance\u003Cbr>of each task | Different tasks have different significance in the final assessment judgements due to:\u003Cbr>• the amount of time they take to complete\u003Cbr>• their relative complexity\u003Cbr>• the scope of learning assessed\u003Cbr>• whether they are a formative or summative assessment.\u003Cbr>For example: One single ‘B’ on a minor task at the end of the year might not result in an overall ‘B’ if all prior assessments were ‘C’ratings. | • Do my records clearly indicate the relative weighting/significance of each assessment task?\u003Cbr>• How are achievements on nonmajor tasks used to inform final judgements?\u003Cbr>• If ‘medium’ weighting is used asan indicator, how are these tasks used to inform final judgements?\u003Cbr>• Does my assessment ‘rule’consider the degree to which each task weighting contributes to the final judgement? |\n| Reflect endpoints in learning | Final assessment judgements are not based on averaging assessments throughout the year.\u003Cbr>Being able to identify endpoints requires clear notations in the assessment record of the date of each assessment judgement.\u003Cbr>For example: If an ‘A’ rating was achieved on a major project that brought together learning from across the year, a single ‘A’ rating might be a reliable indicator of the endpoint achievement. | • Do my records have clear dates of assessment?\u003Cbr>• How many achievements do I consider to be a firm indicator of endpoint achievement?\u003Cbr>• Does my assessment ‘rule’consider and include the concept of endpoints? |\n\n\n| Principles of Final Assessment Judgements | Comments | Questions for teachers to consider |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Consider\u003Cbr>consistency of achievement | • A series of similar achievements later in the year is a sound indicator of consistent achievement (e.g. , B, B, B-and B+ in Terms 3 and 4 are indicators of a final B) .\u003Cbr>• One single ‘A’ rating at the end of the assessment might not mean a final ‘A’rating.\u003Cbr>For example: if an ‘A’ was achieved on a minor assessment task and all prior assessments were ‘C’ ratings, the final rating would most likely be a ‘C’. | • How many similar achievements do I consider to be a firm indicator of consistent endpoint achievement?\u003Cbr>• Is this indicated in my assessment‘rule’? |\n| Consider the validity and reliability of the achievement | • If a student’s achievement was gained on a group task, this may not be reflective of that individual student’s achievement.\u003Cbr>• By their very nature, assessment tasks that are do","cbCaiuDyIq7oh5WF","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuDyIq7oh5WF","pdf",338718,"English","# Final Internal Assessment Methodology\n## Purpose and reporting expectations\n## Principles of final assessment judgements\n## Teacher actions: records, discussion, and monitoring","[{\"question\":\"Why does TASC require a written final internal assessment statement as part of assessment records?\",\"answer\":\"It ensures that if a teacher is absent during the final reporting period, others can access the records and make comparable final internal judgements. This supports fairness and consistency in final ratings.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the methodology say about how final judgements should use assessment tasks?\",\"answer\":\"Final judgements consider the relative weight and significance of each task, including differences in time, complexity, learning scope, and whether tasks are formative or summative.\"},{\"question\":\"How should teachers account for endpoints and not average results across the year?\",\"answer\":\"Final judgements should not be based on averaging. Endpoints require clear notations in the assessment record, such as dates of judgement and whether achievements represent endpoint attainment.\"}]","Final Internal Assessment Methodology - TASC - January 2025 | PDF",1789402672]