[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-426776-105":59,"doc-detail-426776-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","failure-in-legislation-doctrine-of-retroactivity","Failure In Legislation - Doctrine of Retroactivity","","Text discusses persistent failures in controlling crime, arguing that multiple breakdowns in legislation, court rulings, and public apathy combine to worsen public safety. It presents statistics on violent crime growth and describes how policy choices may reduce police resources. The narrative critiques the exclusionary rule, contending it hides the truth, frees the guilty, and undermines justice, and extends this critique to the doctrine of retroactivity in legal decisions. Named speakers and a club address provide the framing.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/failure-in-legislation-doctrine-of-retroactivity/426776/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/failure-in-legislation-doctrine-of-retroactivity/426776.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"นรินทร์","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-14","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why does the text claim crime control has continued to fail?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It argues that there is no single cause, but multiple failures that build on each other, including weak prevention efforts, undercutting law enforcement resources, and legal doctrines that limit accountability.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What is the exclusionary rule criticized for?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The text claims the rule can hide the truth and prevent crucial evidence, enabling guilty people to avoid conviction even when guilt is clear.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the text describe the doctrine of retroactivity?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It states that when courts change a longstanding rule through new interpretation, the new rule may be applied to cases or convictions that occurred before the change.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},426776,1791304018,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},2336475104957,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c6bd8a5076e1?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787554080175789136","Commonveallh  \nPassage o Jarvis Il in the June primaryelection could mean wholesale slashing ofstate budgets as the Legislature seeks waysto accommodate decreased income taxrevenues.President David S.Saxon haswarned of the potential problems facing theUniversity of California system if Jarvis IIpasses,with student tuitions of S3,000onealternative to state support.  \nperience fear as a group of teenage boyswalk toward you on the street;if you aresickened when you read the latest news-paper account of crimes committed in yourcommunity.you prove our failure beyondany doubt.You know from your own ex-perience that things have gotten worse,notbetter.  \nFEB.8  \nThere is no one reason for our con-tinued failure to control crime.Insteadthere have been a number of failures,each building upon the other,which havebrought us to our current sorry state ofaffairs.  \nA key question is:how important is thetax supported college and university systemand are the citizens willing to trade offlower taxes for less in services such aspublic education?Dr.Saxon will addressthesechallenges in this,his third address tothe membership of the CommonwealthClub.  \nApathy Underlying All  \nWe talk a great deal about crime andour concern over it,but,as individualcitizens we do very little.The best way todeal with crime is to prevent it before ithappens,yet how many people are willingto make even the simplest crime preven-tion efforts?It is a fact that more homesand garages are broken into throughunlocked doors than through smashedwindows.  \nELLEN M.NEWMANQuarterly Chairman  \n\"The CaliforniaCriminal JusticeSystem —Who'sWinning?  \nWe allow short-sighted public officials toreduce police budgets,and then wonderwhy we can't find a cop when we needone.We tolerate legislators who,under theguise of furthering civil liberties,actuallyerode our civil right to be secure,by sup-porting laws that favor the criminal,andtie the hands of law enforcement.We ac-cept the rulings of judges who claim thepower to enact judicial legislation whichfrustrates our efforts to punish criminalsand reduce crime.We ignore schools thatdon't teach;rehabilitation efforts that don'trehabilitate;and correctional institutionsthat don't correct.  \nDR.DAVID S.SAXON  \nFRIDAY FLASHES—January 25,1980.From address by TheHonorable George Deukmejian,Attorney General,State of Califor-nia.  \nPresidentUniversity of California  \n\"Higher Educationand the Public In-terest—Can WeAfford Jarvis II?”  \nWe are failing to reduce crime in oursociety.Statistics show it in cold black andwhite.For the ten years between 1969 and1978 violent crime increased 6.4 percent.During that period,the murder rate hasincreased 70 percent.That is the numberof murders per 100,000 of our population.  \n# Failure In Legislation\n\nOne of our failures is the failure ofcourts whose rulings defy logic.frustratereality,and create strange doctrines likethe exclusionary rule.That rule says thatevidence relating to a crime may not beused to prove the crime if the policemanobtained it improperly.It applies even ifthe polceman's conduct is done in goodfaith.The exclusionary rule,said the  \nIn raw figures over 19,000 people havebeen slain during those years.But,I don'tneed statistics to prove our failure.If youworry everytime you or a member of yourfamily goes out alone at night;if you ex-  \nNoon,Rose Room Sheraton PalaceHotel  \nTickets-$8 at the door.  \nINSIDE:20.The Hon.George Deukmejian,CaliforniaAttorney General,feels it is,\"one thing to criticize  \nimproper police activity...and another to punish thevictim and the public by freeing the guilty.”22.Aproposal for a Club Course on Computers.The Commonwealth 19  \njudges who crated it,was to deter futureconduct of a similar nature.  \nWhat it does in fact is to hide the truth,free the guilty,and subvert the system.Noone else in the world has such a rule andfor good reason.Under it a murderer canbe found with a murder weapon in hispocket;a drug dealer with heroin in hishouse;a rapist with the victim's pur","cbCaiayX9rAIUZ2Y","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiayX9rAIUZ2Y","pdf",1957868,"English","# Failure In Legislation\n## Doctrine of Retroactivity","[{\"question\":\"Why does the text claim crime control has continued to fail?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that there is no single cause, but multiple failures that build on each other, including weak prevention efforts, undercutting law enforcement resources, and legal doctrines that limit accountability.\"},{\"question\":\"What is the exclusionary rule criticized for?\",\"answer\":\"The text claims the rule can hide the truth and prevent crucial evidence, enabling guilty people to avoid conviction even when guilt is clear.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the text describe the doctrine of retroactivity?\",\"answer\":\"It states that when courts change a longstanding rule through new interpretation, the new rule may be applied to cases or convictions that occurred before the change.\"}]","Failure In Legislation - Doctrine of Retroactivity | PDF",1790641770,13]