[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-603362-105":59,"doc-detail-603362-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","eyes-on-me-regardless-youth-responses-to-high-school-surveillance","Eyes on Me Regardless - Youth Responses to High School Surveillance","","Public school students increasingly experience school safety programs built around surveillance technologies and heavy police or security presence. The text describes how metal detectors, scanning systems, and camera-equipped hallways shape students’ daily movement while fostering fear, disillusionment, and increased perceptions of danger. Focusing on New York City policy and broader post-9/11 surveillance trends, it argues these measures can be counterproductive, intensifying harassment and correlating with greater scrutiny and criminalization risks for low-income youth of color.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/eyes-on-me-regardless-youth-responses-to-high-school-surveillance/603362/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/eyes-on-me-regardless-youth-responses-to-high-school-surveillance/603362.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"moss~","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What kinds of surveillance measures do students encounter in public schools?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"Students enter and exit through metal detectors and scanning machines and move through areas monitored by surveillance cameras, often under shouted guidance from security and police personnel.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"How does the document describe the impact of surveillance on students’ sense of safety?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"Instead of greater safety, students report increased danger, disillusionment, and a feeling of being targeted or unwanted by school security agents.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"What broader social argument does the text make about school surveillance policies?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"It links surveillance trends to post-9/11, neoliberal social control, and the indirect consequences of monitoring marginalized youth, including heightened scrutiny and risks tied to criminalization.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},603362,1792096136,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":138,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":143},962090895452,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","“Eyes on Me Regardless”: Youth Responses  \nto High School Surveillance  \nBy Jen Weiss  \nJen Weiss is a Ph.D. candidate in Urban Education at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York City, New York.  \nIn public schools across the country, students are encountering the effects ofa variety of security measures designed to make schools safer. Students enter and exit their schools through metal detectors, scanning machines, and under the suspicious stares and booming shouts of security officials and police officers. On their way to classes, they move through hallways, stairwells, and sometimes classrooms mounted with surveillance cameras. From California to Florida, Washington to Maine, urban and suburbanpublic schoolofficialsandgovernment policymakers are choosing to respond to issues related to student violence and school safety by deploying an array of surveilling techniques and technologies.  \nNewYork City, home ofmore surveillance cameras per square foot than any other city in the country, leads the pack in developing and implementing school-based surveillance initiatives (Ruck et al., 2005; Boal, 1998) . In 2004, City Council passed a bill to install surveillance cameras and metal detectors in every public school by 2006 and allocated $120 million in the five year capital budget for new security cameras which cost  \napproximately $75,000 per school to install (Bennett, 2004) . In fact, the City’s Impact schools and nine other large high schools, with large African-American and Latino populations, were top priority to receive cameras, metal detectors, and heavy police presence. Ostensibly designed to improve school safety, the effects of the technologies and personnel required to implement surveillance are manifold—many of which are counterproductive to safety, and, in some cases, actually foment violence. Instead of a greater sense of safety in and around school, along with an active and civicly-minded sense of school community, students describe a feeling of danger and disillusion.  \nMore and more, public schools are becoming part of the network of post-9/11, state-sponsored surveillance—spaces in which students experience firsthand what it is to be monitored, feared, contained, and harassed all in the name of safety and protection. Even after security measures are installed, students refer to an increase in the number of violent incidents inside their schools, and attest to the harassment they experience at the hands of police and school safety agents (SSA)1 now located inside their schools.2 As one student put it: “If you would walk outside when the late bell rings, you would hear [the security staff yelling] ‘Get out. Go home. Go home’ …They do not want us there. And even when we’re inside the building, they do not want us there. So it’s a constant ‘I don’t want you here’typa thing.”  \nThese stories match up with current research noting that low-income youth of color are being pushed out of public spaces and are increasingly monitored by authority and placed under the threat of criminalization (see Fine et al., 2003; Rucket al, 2005) . Correspondent with research that contends that with greater police presence comes an elevation in arrests and incarceration rates for youth of color, especially African-Americans (Poe-Yagamata & Jones, 2000), the students with whom I worked are equally aware of heightened scrutiny in their school, as well as in surrounding neighborhoods and around their homes.  \nThese studies illuminate some of what gets forgotten in the search for greater school security and fewer incidents of school violence: that school-wide surveillance policies also produce indirect and counterproductive consequences on urban students, especially but not only those already marginalized by the school system. The very presence of urban youth, educational theorist Henry Giroux argues, prompts in the public imagination a “rhetoric of fear, control, and surveillance”(2003, p. 554). LoicWacquant refer","cbCaikskWby1lumx","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikskWby1lumx","pdf",175206,23,"English","# Youth responses to school surveillance\n## Surveillance technologies and daily student experience\n## New York City policy context and outcomes\n## Effects: fear, disillusionment, and counterproductive safety\n## Connection to post-9/11 surveillance and criminalization","[{\"question\":\"What kinds of surveillance measures do students encounter in public schools?\",\"answer\":\"Students enter and exit through metal detectors and scanning machines and move through areas monitored by surveillance cameras, often under shouted guidance from security and police personnel.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document describe the impact of surveillance on students’ sense of safety?\",\"answer\":\"Instead of greater safety, students report increased danger, disillusionment, and a feeling of being targeted or unwanted by school security agents.\"},{\"question\":\"What broader social argument does the text make about school surveillance policies?\",\"answer\":\"It links surveillance trends to post-9/11, neoliberal social control, and the indirect consequences of monitoring marginalized youth, including heightened scrutiny and risks tied to criminalization.\"}]","Eyes on Me Regardless - Youth Responses to High School Surveillance | PDF",58]