[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31438":3,"doc-seo-31438":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31438,5909877438554,"Maeve","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/5600025385ad2bf12a7?_k=1778553567797529272",8,"Research & Report","Extensive Energy, Exergy, Economic, Exergoeconomic, Enviroeconomic, and Energy Payback Time Analysis of Bifacial Solar Photovoltaic Modules Using Nonbiodegradable Waste as Reflectors","Bifacial photovoltaic modules generate additional electricity by harvesting solar radiation on both sides, and reflectors increase albedo while improving overall performance. Reflector discoloration, degradation, and higher implementation costs limit long-term deployment, and disposal can create environmental burdens. An investigative 6E framework—energy, exergy, economic, exergoeconomic, enviroeconomic, and energy payback time—is applied to bifacial PV using nonbiodegradable wastes (PVC flex, polystyrene foam, aluminum foil) as reflectors. PVC flex delivers the best performance and shows favorable environmental and economic impacts.","cbCaimsvYr7rEVsl","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimsvYr7rEVsl","pdf",1474623,1,11,"English","en","# Introduction\n## Nonbiodegradable Waste as Reflectors","[{\"question\":\"Why do bifacial photovoltaic modules produce higher output than monofacial panels?\",\"answer\":\"Bifacial PV modules capture solar radiation on both the front and backside. This increases energy generation, especially in locations with strong reflected sunlight and where albedo is higher.\"},{\"question\":\"What problem motivates using nonbiodegradable waste as reflectors?\",\"answer\":\"Conventional reflectors can discolor and degrade over time, increasing replacement and total implementation cost. Their disposal may also negatively affect the environment depending on material type.\"},{\"question\":\"Which nonbiodegradable reflector material performed best in the study and what were the reported efficiency results?\",\"answer\":\"PVC flex enhanced bifacial PV performance better than polystyrene foam and aluminum foil. The study reports average power of 224 W, average energy efficiency of 27%, and average exergy efficiency of 31% for the PVC flex case.\"}]",1779483694,28,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"extensive-energy-exergy-economic-exergoeconomic-enviroeconomic-and-energy-payback-time-analysis-of-bifacial-solar-photovoltaic-modules-using-nonbiodegradable-waste-as-reflectors","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/extensive-energy-exergy-economic-exergoeconomic-enviroeconomic-and-energy-payback-time-analysis-of-bifacial-solar-photovoltaic-modules-using-nonbiodegradable-waste-as-reflectors/31438/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"Why do bifacial photovoltaic modules produce higher output than monofacial panels?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"Bifacial PV modules capture solar radiation on both the front and backside. This increases energy generation, especially in locations with strong reflected sunlight and where albedo is higher.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What problem motivates using nonbiodegradable waste as reflectors?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Conventional reflectors can discolor and degrade over time, increasing replacement and total implementation cost. Their disposal may also negatively affect the environment depending on material type.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Which nonbiodegradable reflector material performed best in the study and what were the reported efficiency results?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"PVC flex enhanced bifacial PV performance better than polystyrene foam and aluminum foil. The study reports average power of 224 W, average energy efficiency of 27%, and average exergy efficiency of 31% for the PVC flex case.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]