[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-502692-105":59,"doc-detail-502692-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","execution-of-enforcement-of-awards-by-sheriffs-ccma-sass-response","EXECUTION OF ENFORCEMENT OF AWARDS BY SHERIFFS - CCMA SASS Response","","A response from SASS addresses challenges faced by sheriffs when executing Enforcement Awards issued by the CCMA. It reviews previous engagements with CCMA and proposes capacity-building through a workshop covering the execution process for sheriffs and CCMA officials. It also discusses how payment of sheriff accounts has improved through decentralisation, while noting remaining payment issues and outlining recommendations for resolving them. Additional concerns include interpleader proceedings, jurisdiction, process after third-party claims, sheriffs’ costs, and release of assets.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/execution-of-enforcement-of-awards-by-sheriffs-ccma-sass-response/502692/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/execution-of-enforcement-of-awards-by-sheriffs-ccma-sass-response/502692.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Guten tag","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-12","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does SASS propose to address challenges in executing CCMA Enforcement Awards?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"SASS recommends organising a workshop led by SABFS to share pertinent issues and ensure CCMA officials are capacitated on the execution process.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How are sheriff account payments handled, and what issues remain?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Payments have improved due to decentralisation to provincial level and better accessibility. Some members still report challenges involving outstanding old accounts, missing remittance advices, and irregular payments.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why are interpleader proceedings a concern, and what recommendations are made?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Concerns include courts refusing or not adjudicating interpleaders due to perceived lack of jurisdiction, lack of mandate for CCMA to issue instructions, and practices that add costs or allow asset releases to stall execution. Recommendations address resolving competent court issues, adopting a definitive position, reviewing assistance for interpleader lodging, and closing the loophole leading to premature release of assets.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},502692,1791307882,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},687212321768,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a0010bdbe886d2fe77?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1789897067658708522","7 AUGUST 2020  \nEXECUTION OF ENFORCEMENT OF AWARDS BY SHERIFFS  \nKindly find here below SASS’ response to the challenges experienced by sheriffs in relation to the execution of Enforcement Awards issued by the CCMA.  \nKindly also note that the issues outlined below were identified through a consultative process between SASS and its members.  \n1. PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENTS WITH THE CCMA  \nThe sheriff associations had various meetings with CCMA national management whereby challenges were raised by both sheriffs and CCMA. These meetings turned out to be fruitful and various of the challenges could be resolved.  \nIt has been a while since there were interactions with CCMA. However, at the last meeting it was suggested that the CCMA be assisted in dealing with the execution process and the challenges experienced by CCMA officials.  \nIt was suggested that the first point of call should be to capacitate CCMA officials on the execution process in the form of training/ workshop. The ultimate aim was to have a mapped out execution process that would be followed by both parties (Sheriffs and CCMA) .  \nRECOMMENDATION  \nSASS therefore recommends that:  \n(i) a workshop be organised by the SABFS in order to share with the CCMA pertinent issues relating to processes and issues handled by sheriffs in carying out the instructions by the CCMA.  \nIt is proposed that such a workshop be held in October/ November once the lockdown level has gone down to 2/1 .  \n(ii) such a workshop be attended by:  \na) 2 officials from the SABFS  \nb) 11 officials from CCMA  \nc) 2 officials from SASS and 2 from SANAPS  \n2. PAYMENT OF SHERIFF ACCOUNTS  \nWe are pleased to report that the payment of sheriff’s accounts have been resolved to a large extent. We believe this improvement is due to the fact that the payment of sheriff accounts was decentralised to provincial level and is now more accessible.  \nHowever, a few members reported challenges with payment of their accounts and these challenges relate to outstanding old accounts, remittance advices not issued, irregular payments, etc.  \nRECOMMENDATION  \nIt is proposed that these individual incidents be raised with the specific provincial head or official of the CCMA where they have occurred. Sheriffs will be accordingly advised. It is proposed that the CCMA does the same with its provincial officials.  \nFeedback from the CCMA on this issue will be appreciated.  \n3. INTERPLEADER PROCEEDINGS  \nThe handling of 3rd party claims and interpleader proceedings remain a matter of concern due to the following reasons:  \n3.1 Jurisdiction  \nEnforcement Awards are executed in terms of the Magistrate’s Court Regulations. It therefore follows that interpleader summonses should be issued out of the Magistrate’s Courts. However, some courts refuse to issue or to adjudicate these interpleaders, claiming they have no jurisdiction over labour matters.  \nIn practice, some Magistrate’s Courts which do accept Interpleader Summonses, adopted a process whereby the Interpleader Summons is assigned a new case number when documents are presented to the Clerk of the Court for issuing.  \nAnother practice in some courts is that the Enforcement Award is issued with a case number in the Magistrate’s Court, before execution by the sheriff. Any court processes following execution of the Enforcement Award (such as interpleader procedure) will be handled in that Magistrate’s Court, under the case number that was initially assigned to the matter.  \nRECOMMENDATION  \nIt is recommended that the issue of a competent court to adjudicate on Interpleader matters be resolved between the CCMA, the Labour Courts and the Magistrates Courts.  \n3.2 Process followed after receipt of 3rd party claim  \nWe have been informed that the CCMA has no mandate to issue instructions on interpleader proceedings. Therefore, in the event a 3rd party claim is received after attachment, the matter will only proceed beyond this stage if the complainant (employee) is willing to drive the pro","cbCaircYbqudCjw2","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaircYbqudCjw2","pdf",147132,"English","# Previous Engagements with the CCMA\n## Recommendation\n# Payment of Sheriff Accounts\n## Recommendation\n# Interpleader Proceedings\n## Jurisdiction\n## Process followed after receipt of 3rd party claim\n## Sheriffs costs\n## Release of assets\n# Other Matters Reported by SASS Members\n## Interest payable on the award","[{\"question\":\"What does SASS propose to address challenges in executing CCMA Enforcement Awards?\",\"answer\":\"SASS recommends organising a workshop led by SABFS to share pertinent issues and ensure CCMA officials are capacitated on the execution process.\"},{\"question\":\"How are sheriff account payments handled, and what issues remain?\",\"answer\":\"Payments have improved due to decentralisation to provincial level and better accessibility. Some members still report challenges involving outstanding old accounts, missing remittance advices, and irregular payments.\"},{\"question\":\"Why are interpleader proceedings a concern, and what recommendations are made?\",\"answer\":\"Concerns include courts refusing or not adjudicating interpleaders due to perceived lack of jurisdiction, lack of mandate for CCMA to issue instructions, and practices that add costs or allow asset releases to stall execution. Recommendations address resolving competent court issues, adopting a definitive position, reviewing assistance for interpleader lodging, and closing the loophole leading to premature release of assets.\"}]","EXECUTION OF ENFORCEMENT OF AWARDS BY SHERIFFS - CCMA SASS Response | PDF",1791040434,18]