[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-180072-105":59,"doc-detail-180072-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","exam-factors-and-candidate-backgrounds","Exam Factors and Candidate Backgrounds","","Survey frequency tables and factor analysis summarize how examinee demographics and academic/work profiles relate to perceptions of an exam’s fairness and quality. The document reports distributions for gender, GPA, workplace sector, academic qualification, marital status, school affiliation, and age bands. It then ranks evaluation factors by mean and standard deviation, highlighting concerns such as unclear questions, incomplete coverage, inadequate exam time, unsuitable exam environment, lack of proper references, and continuous changes in accounting standards, alongside issues about preparation, training, repetition, and experience.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam-factors-and-candidate-backgrounds/180072/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/exam-factors-and-candidate-backgrounds/180072.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Emma Mercer","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-27","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What candidate background variables are included in the survey?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The document includes gender, GPA, workplace sector (private/public/others), academic qualification, marital status, school affiliation (AASCB member vs not), and age groups.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Which exam-related factors receive the highest concern scores?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Top-ranked factors include the exam scope not being identified, questions not covering all subjects, and the exam not measuring examinees’ capabilities, alongside issues like references and changes in accounting standards.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What behavior-related factors influence perceptions of exam adequacy?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The document highlights that preparing for the exam is not enough, limited auditing experience, not attending training programs, and acceptance of repeating the exam, while also noting careless behavior and reliance on old references.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},180072,1790251152,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":44,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962084925502,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","| Frequency Percent |  |  | Frequency Percent |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Gender\u003Cbr>Male\u003Cbr>Female\u003Cbr>Total\u003Cbr>Private sector\u003Cbr>Public sector\u003Cbr>Others\u003Cbr>Total\u003Cbr>Your GPA\u003Cbr>Below 2.00 | 80\u003Cbr>40\u003Cbr>120\u003Cbr>Working place\u003Cbr>30\u003Cbr>80\u003Cbr>10\u003Cbr>120\u003Cbr>10 | 66.7\u003Cbr>33.3\u003Cbr>100\u003Cbr>25.5\u003Cbr>66.7\u003Cbr>8.4\u003Cbr>100\u003Cbr>8,33 | Academic Qualification |  |  |\n|  |  |  | Bachelor Masters PhD Total | 100155120 | 83.3 12.5 4.2 100 |\n|  |  |  | Marital Status |  |  |\n|  |  |  | Single\u003Cbr>Married\u003Cbr>Total\u003Cbr>Your School\u003Cbr>Member inAASCB Not member inAASCB Total\u003Cbr>Age\u003Cbr>Less than 30 years old From 30-40 years old\u003Cbr>From 40-50 years old years Over 50 years old\u003Cbr>Total | 3090120\u003Cbr>8436120\u003Cbr>40383012\u003Cbr>120 | 25.0 75.0 100\u003Cbr>7030100\u003Cbr>33.3 31.7 25.0 10.0\u003Cbr>100 |\n| 2,00-2,66\u003Cbr>2.67-3.00\u003Cbr>3.01-3.49\u003Cbr>3.50-3.74\u003Cbr>3.75-4.00\u003Cbr>Total\u003Cbr>Source: Authors | 70\u003Cbr>20\u003Cbr>10\u003Cbr>6\u003Cbr>4\u003Cbr>120 | 58,3\u003Cbr>16.7\u003Cbr>8.33\u003Cbr>5.0\u003Cbr>3.33\u003Cbr>100 |  |  |  |\n\n\n| Factor | Mean | SD | Rank |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| The scope of the exam is not identified | 4.3 | .52 | 1 |\n| The exam's questions are not clear | 3.0 | .77 | 7 |\n| The exam's questions do not cover all subjects | 4.1 | .52 | 2 |\n| Changes in accounting standards | 3.7 | .65 | 4 |\n| Lack of proper references | 3.6 | .73 | 5 |\n| The time allocated for the exam is insufficient | 1.7 | .82 | 9 |\n| The exam does not measure the examinee's capabilities | 4.0 | .75 | 3 |\n| The distribution of scores between papers is not fair | 2.3 | .82 | 8 |\n| Continuous changes in rules and regulations | 3.3 | .55 | 6 |\n| The exam environment (exam halls) are not suitable | 1.5 | .84 | 10 |\n\n\n| Factor | Mean | SD | Rank |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Preparing for the exam is not enough | 4.3 | .53 | 1 |\n| Careless towards the exam | 2.5 | .73 | 6 |\n| Accepting the idea of repeating the exam | 4.2 | .63 | 2 |\n| Limited auditing experience | 3.1 | .71 | 4 |\n| Not attending training programs | 4.0 | .66 | 3 |\n| Old references | 2.3 | .75 | 7 |\n| Exam's fees do not burden the examinee | 3.0 | .63 | 5 |","cbCainZxOOHjDw7L","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainZxOOHjDw7L","pdf",537705,"English","# Candidate Background Distributions\n## Demographics and Academic/Work Profiles\n# Perceived Exam Factors\n## Mean, SD, and Ranking of Issues\n# Preparation and Exam-Taking Behaviors\n## Reported Constraints and Attitudes","[{\"question\":\"What candidate background variables are included in the survey?\",\"answer\":\"The document includes gender, GPA, workplace sector (private/public/others), academic qualification, marital status, school affiliation (AASCB member vs not), and age groups.\"},{\"question\":\"Which exam-related factors receive the highest concern scores?\",\"answer\":\"Top-ranked factors include the exam scope not being identified, questions not covering all subjects, and the exam not measuring examinees’ capabilities, alongside issues like references and changes in accounting standards.\"},{\"question\":\"What behavior-related factors influence perceptions of exam adequacy?\",\"answer\":\"The document highlights that preparing for the exam is not enough, limited auditing experience, not attending training programs, and acceptance of repeating the exam, while also noting careless behavior and reliance on old references.\"}]","Exam Factors and Candidate Backgrounds | PDF",1788339304,23]