[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-583458-105":59,"doc-detail-583458-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","evidence-for-student-centered-learning-by-krista-kaput-january-2018","Evidence for Student-Centered Learning - by Krista Kaput - January 2018","","Evidence for Student-Centered Learning argues that U.S. K-12 education has not produced equitable, rigorous, relevant, and engaging outcomes for all students despite decades of reform. The text frames persistent underperformance as a result of the original system’s purpose: preparing students for industrial, standardized work. It traces this design to Frederick Taylor’s scientific management and its lasting influence through education reformers, explaining why standardized approaches systematically disregard individual student needs.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/evidence-for-student-centered-learning-by-krista-kaput-january-2018/583458/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/evidence-for-student-centered-learning-by-krista-kaput-january-2018/583458.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What core problem does the document identify with U.S. K-12 education reform?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It argues that reforms have failed to create an equitable system because the education system is not actually “broken”; it was designed to educate masses in a standardized way that disregards individual student needs.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the document connect education outcomes to Frederick Taylor’s scientific management?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It explains that scientific management shaped a centralized, hierarchical structure where management sets rules and procedures, leading to standardized instruction and optimized productivity while ignoring the individual.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which “seven principles” does the document say support student-centered learning?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The document lists: Positive Relationships, Whole Child Needs, Positive Identity, Student Ownership and Agency, Real-World Relevant, Competency Progression, and Anytime, Anywhere Learning.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},583458,1792171225,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Evidence for Student-Centered Learning  \nby Krista Kaput January 2018  \nAbout Education Evolving. We are a Minnesota-based, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization focused on improving American public education. We work to advance student-centered learning for all students, by supporting teachers designing and leading schools, and by advocating for policy that is open to innovation. [Read more at](Read more at www.educationevolving.org)[ www.educationevolving.org](Read more at www.educationevolving.org).  \nContents  \nPart 1:  \nIntroduction and Context 5  \nPart 2:  \nEducation Evolving’s Seven Principles of Student-Centered Learning 7  \nPart 3:  \nEvolution of Student-Centered Learning: A Historical Perspective 9  \nPart 4:  \nResearch on Student-Centered Learning as a Whole 11  \nPart 5:  \nResearch Supporting Each Principle of Student-Centered Learning 13  \nPrinciple \\#1: Positive Relationships 13  \nPrinciple \\#2: Whole Child Needs 14  \nPrinciple \\#3: Positive Identity 15  \nPrinciple \\#4: Student Ownership and Agency 16  \nPrinciple \\#5: Real-World Relevant 17  \nPrinciple \\#6: Competency Progression 18  \nPrinciple \\#7: Anytime, Anywhere Learning 19  \nConclusion 21  \nEndnotes 22  \nEvidence for Student-Centered Learning | 3  \n4 |  [educationevolving.org](educationevolving.org)  \n PIntand Context   \nOn April 30, 1983, President Ronald Reagan addressed the nation and declared,“Our education  \nsystem, once the finest in the world, is in a sorry state of disrepair.”1 His assertion was a response  \nto the findings of the 1983 A Nation at Risk report, which was released by the President’s National  \nCommission on Excellence in Education. The report highlighted startling statistics about the high  \nilliteracy rates amongst American youth, as well as the steady decline of standardized test scores in  \nreading, science, and mathematics.2  \nSince the release of A Nation at Risk, the narrative that the nation’s E-12 public education system  \nis “broken” and must be fixed has been prominent in reform efforts—from President Bush’s No Child  \nLeft Behind, which scaled high stakes, standardized test-based school accountability, to President  \nObama’s Race to the Top Grant, which provided monetary incentives for states to adopt the Common  \nCore Standards and promote school choice. While these education reform efforts have had a profound  \nimpact on E-12 public education, the academic outcomes of the nation’s public school students have  \ncontinued to be disappointing.3  \nIn fact, after almost 35 years of major education reform efforts and billions of taxpayer dollars spent,  \nthe nation’s public schools are still not preparing most students for college and career4 or to be  \ncompetitive in the global economy.5 Many employers feel that today’s college graduates are not well  \nprepared to achieve the learning outcomes that they view as important.6 In particular, the business  \ncommunity has indicated that college graduates do not possess sufficient skills in mathematics,  \nreading, and in “soft skills” like work ethic, accountability, and self-motivation.7  \nThe continued failure of the nation’s E-12 public education system to successfully educate all students  \nand prepare them for college and career raises the question: Why? Why, after all the time and  \nresources that have been put into fixing our nation’s public schools, have education reform efforts  \nfailed to create an equitable system that is academically rigorous, relevant, and engaging for all  \nstudents?  \nThe answer is simple. The design and intention of our country’s public education system was never to  \neducate nor meet the needs of all students. Rather, its purpose was to prepare students, in mass, to  \nwork in an industrialized and standardized economy.  \nThe design of our current public education system was highly influenced by Frederick Taylor’s concept  \nof scientific management, which is centered around improving economic efficiency by putting the  \nsystem first and ignoring the indiv","cbCaijIucc33mCo1","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijIucc33mCo1","pdf",2446196,28,"English","# Part 1: Introduction and Context\n# Part 2: Education Evolving’s Seven Principles of Student-Centered Learning\n# Part 3: Evolution of Student-Centered Learning: A Historical Perspective\n# Part 4: Research on Student-Centered Learning as a Whole\n# Part 5: Research Supporting Each Principle of Student-Centered Learning","[{\"question\":\"What core problem does the document identify with U.S. K-12 education reform?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that reforms have failed to create an equitable system because the education system is not actually “broken”; it was designed to educate masses in a standardized way that disregards individual student needs.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document connect education outcomes to Frederick Taylor’s scientific management?\",\"answer\":\"It explains that scientific management shaped a centralized, hierarchical structure where management sets rules and procedures, leading to standardized instruction and optimized productivity while ignoring the individual.\"},{\"question\":\"Which “seven principles” does the document say support student-centered learning?\",\"answer\":\"The document lists: Positive Relationships, Whole Child Needs, Positive Identity, Student Ownership and Agency, Real-World Relevant, Competency Progression, and Anytime, Anywhere Learning.\"}]","Evidence for Student-Centered Learning - by Krista Kaput - January 2018 | PDF",1792047300,71]