[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-139066-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-139066-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","evaluation-of-the-magnet-schools-assistance-program-1998-grantees-case-studies-appendix-final-report","Evaluation of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 1998 Grantees - Case Studies Appendix - Final Report","","Final report presenting in-depth case studies for eight MSAP projects funded under the 1998 grantees. AIR selected diverse district sites (A–H) to reflect the characteristics of all 57 MSAP projects, including required and voluntary desegregation plans, geographic variation, and differences in minority population composition. For each district, MSAP schools across elementary, middle, and high levels were sampled and paired with comparison non-magnet schools at the same level, serving similar racial/ethnic students to support comparisons of student achievement outcomes.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/evaluation-of-the-magnet-schools-assistance-program-1998-grantees-case-studies-appendix-final-report/139066/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/evaluation-of-the-magnet-schools-assistance-program-1998-grantees-case-studies-appendix-final-report/139066.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Eden","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-18","2026-08-23",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the MSAP case studies appendix?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The purpose is to illuminate and illustrate results from data collected across all 57 MSAP projects using detailed district case studies.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How were the district sites A to H selected?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Districts were chosen to be sufficiently diverse, covering required and voluntary desegregation plans, geographic representation, and variation in the minority population’s proportion and makeup.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How were schools selected and compared within each district?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Each project used a sample of three to four MSAP schools covering elementary, middle, and high levels, and included one or two comparison non-magnet schools serving similar racial/ethnic students.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},139066,1787495222,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":144},1374391974468,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","POLICY AND PROGRAM STUDIES SERVICE   \nEvaluation of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 1998 Grantees:  \nCase Studies Appendix  \nFINAL REPORT  \n2003  \nU. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ~ OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY DOC NO. 2003-15  \nEvaluation of the  \nMagnet Schools Assistance Program, 1998 Grantees:  \nCase Studies Appendix  \nPrepared for:  \nU.S. Department of Education  \nOffice of the Under Secretary Policy and Program Studies Service  \nBruce Christenson  \nSusan Cole  \nMarian Eaton  \nBen Martinez  \nMatthew Gaertner  \nMichael S. Garet  \nPhyllis DuBois  \nAmerican Institutes for Research Washington, D.C.  \n2003  \nThis report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Education under Contract No. ED-98-CO-0067 . The views expressed herein are those of the contractors. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education is intended or should be inferred.  \nU.S. Department of Education  \nRod Paige Secretary  \nOffice of the Under Secretary  \nEugene Hickok Under Secretary  \nPolicy and Program Studies Service  \nAlan L. Ginsburg Director  \nProgram and Analytic Studies Division  \nDavid Goodwin Director  \nNovember 2003  \nThis report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U. S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Evaluation of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 1998 Grantees: Case Studies Appendix, Washington, D.C., 2003.  \nTo order copies of this report, write:  \nED Pubs  \nEducation Publications Center  \nU.S. Department of Education  \nP.O. Box 1398 Jessup, MD 20794-1398  \nVia fax, dial (301) 470-1244  \nOr via electronic mail, send your request to: [edpubs@inet.ed.gov](edpubs@inet.ed.gov).  \nYou may also call toll-free: 1-877-433-7827 (1-877-4-ED-PUBS) . If 877 service is not yet available in your area, call 1-800-872-5327 (1-800-USA-LEARN) . Those who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter (TTY) should call 1-800-437-0833.  \nTo order online, point your Internet browser [to: www.edpubs.org](to: www.edpubs.org).  \nThis report is available on the Department's Web site at: [http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/ppss/index.html](http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/ppss/index.html)[ ](http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/ppss/index.html)On request, this publication is also available in alternative formats, such as Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette. For more information, please contact the Department's Alternate Format Center at  \n(202) 260-9895 or (202) 205-8113.  \nContents  \nIntroduction to Case Studies ........................................................................................................... 1  \nCase Study, District A..................................................................................................................... 7  \nCase Study, District B................................................................................................................... 37  \nCase Study, District C................................................................................................................... 67  \nCase Study, District D................................................................................................................... 95  \nCase Study, District E ................................................................................................................. 123  \nCase Study, District F ................................................................................................................. 151  \nCase Study, District G................................................................................................................. 181  \nCase Study, District H................................................................................................................. 209  \nIntroduction to Case Studies  \n2  \nAIR conducted in-depth case studies of eight MSAP","cbCaijJtbcrJT00c","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijJtbcrJT00c","pdf",1237200,244,"English","# Introduction to Case Studies\n## Methodology\n## Case Study District A\n## Case Study District B\n## Case Study District C\n## Case Study District D\n## Case Study District E\n## Case Study District F\n## Case Study District G\n## Case Study District H","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the MSAP case studies appendix?\",\"answer\":\"The purpose is to illuminate and illustrate results from data collected across all 57 MSAP projects using detailed district case studies.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the district sites A to H selected?\",\"answer\":\"Districts were chosen to be sufficiently diverse, covering required and voluntary desegregation plans, geographic representation, and variation in the minority population’s proportion and makeup.\"},{\"question\":\"How were schools selected and compared within each district?\",\"answer\":\"Each project used a sample of three to four MSAP schools covering elementary, middle, and high levels, and included one or two comparison non-magnet schools serving similar racial/ethnic students.\"}]","Evaluation of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program, 1998 Grantees - Case Studies Appendix - Final Report | PDF",615]