[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-294670-105":59,"doc-detail-294670-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","evaluation-of-the-asvab-8910-clerical-composite-for-predicting-training-school-performance-technical-report-594","Evaluation of the ASVAB 8/9/10 Clerical Composite for Predicting Training School Performance - Technical Report 594","","Evaluation of an Army clerical selection composite derived from the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) is presented, focusing on how composite test scores predict entry-level training school performance. The clerical composite (CL) shows high validity (about 0.68) for the criterion. An alternate composite based on multiple regression using Arithmetic Reasoning, Paragraph Comprehension, and Mathematics Knowledge yields even higher validity (about 0.74). Differential prediction for classification purposes is discussed, with recommendations tied to reducing attrition and improving placement.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/evaluation-of-the-asvab-8910-clerical-composite-for-predicting-training-school-performance-technical-report-594/294670/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/evaluation-of-the-asvab-8910-clerical-composite-for-predicting-training-school-performance-technical-report-594/294670.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Maya Linwood","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What test scores were evaluated to predict training school performance?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The report evaluates a clerical composite (CL) derived from ASVAB sub-tests and an alternate regression-based composite using Arithmetic Reasoning, Paragraph Comprehension, and Mathematics Knowledge scores.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How valid was the clerical composite (CL) for the training performance criterion?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The clerical composite shows high validity, reported as approximately 0.68 for the criterion of training performance.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the report recommend regarding improving the classification composite?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The results suggest adding a mathematics component to the composite to improve prediction of training performance, supporting advice to the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},294670,1789697294,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962084928432,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",".)  \nAD-A143 235  \nIC FILE 0PY  \nTechnical Report 594  \n# Evaluation of the ASVAB 8/9/10Clerical Composite for PredictingTraining School Performance\n\nMary M.Weltin and Beverly A.Popelka  \nSelection and Classification Technical AreaManpowor and Porsonnel Rescarch Laboratory  \nU.S.Army  \nResearch Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences  \nOctober 1983  \nApproved for publie relea0;distribu tlon unlimited.  \n840   19018  \n# U.S.ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTEFOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES\n\nA Field Operating Agency under the Jurisdiction of theDeputy Chief of St aff for Personnel  \nL.NEALE COSBY  \nEDGAR M.JOHNSONTechnical Director  \nColoncl,IN  \nCommander  \n## Reviewers:\n\nLawrence M.HanserRichard JohnsonKaren MitchellHi1da WingNewel1 K.Eaton  \n## NOTICES\n\nDISTRIBUTION:  Pr imary distr ibutlon of this rsport has beon mode by ARI.PI●85e addross corrospondence concerning dlstributlon of roports to:  U.s.Army Resarch Instituto for the Behavloral and soclal Sclences,ATTN:PERI-POT,5001 Eisenhower Avenue,Alexandrla,Virginia 22333.  \nFINAL DISPOSITION:    This report may bo dostroyod when It Is no longernoeded.   Pleas do not return It to the U.s.Army Rosoarch institute forthe Behavloral and Soclal Sclences.  \nNOTE:  The findings In this report aro not to be construed as an officlalDepartment of the Army posItion,unless so desIgnated by other authorizeddocuments.  \nUNCLASSIFIED  \nsgCUAITY CLA331PICATION O THISPAGe (men Deae Entored)  \n\n| REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE   |  | READ INSTRUCTIONS  \u003Cbr>BEFORE COMPLETING FORM   |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 1.AEPORT NUMLER  \u003Cbr>Technical Report 594   | 2.GOVT ACCEsSION No.   | 3.RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER   |\n| 4.TITLE (cnd Subttcle)  \u003Cbr>EVALUATION OF THE ASVAB 8/9/10 CLERICAL  \u003Cbr>COMPOSITE FOR PREDICTING TRAINING SCHOOL  \u003Cbr>PERFORMANCE   |  | 5.TYPE OF REPORT&PERIOD coVERED  \u003Cbr>--   |\n|  |  | 6.PERFORMING ORG.REPORT NUMBER  \u003Cbr>--   |\n| 7.AUTHOR()  \u003Cbr>Mary M.Weltin and Beverly A.Popelka   |  | .CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERCo)  \u003Cbr>--   |\n| 5.PERFOAMING oRGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS  \u003Cbr>U.s.Army Research Institute for the Behavioral  \u003Cbr>and Social Sciences  \u003Cbr>5001 Eisenhower Avenue,Alexandria,VA 22333   |  | 10.PROGRAMELEMENT.PROJECT.TASK  \u003Cbr>AREA  WORK UNiT NUMBERS  \u003Cbr>63731A 310256  \u003Cbr>2Q263731A792   |\n| 11.CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS  \u003Cbr>Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel  \u003Cbr>Washington,DC 20310   |  | 12.REPORT DATE  \u003Cbr>October 1983   |\n|  |  | 13.NUMBER OFPAGE5  \u003Cbr>28   |\n| 14.MONITORING AGENCY NAME ADDRESS(I1 dilfernt hroe Controlling Offlee)   |  | 1S.SECURITY CLASS.(0l thte report)  \u003Cbr>UNCLASSIFIED   |\n|  |  | 15.OECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING  \u003Cbr>SCHEDULE  \u003Cbr>--   |\n| DI5TNIBUTION STATEMENT(of thla Report)  \u003Cbr>Approved for public release;distribution unlimited.   |  |  |\n| 17.DISTABUTION STATEMENT (ef the batraet ntored In Bloek 20,It dflernt hron Reporl)  \u003Cbr>--   |  |  |\n| 1.SUPPLEMCNTARY NOTES  \u003Cbr>--   |  |  |\n| 19.KEYWORD3 (Centtnue n rvern len if nec nd Ifentiy by block nunber)  \u003Cbr>Selection and classification testing  \u003Cbr>Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery(ASVAB)   |  |  |\n| TNACTd   rorr     ow     MeitMock nvmber)  \u003Cbr>The composite of Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery(ASVAB)sub-  \u003Cbr>tests used to select applicants for entry-level training in Army clerical  \u003Cbr>schools was evaluated by correlating composite scores with training perfor-  \u003Cbr>mance scores.The clerical composite(CL)had high validityr=.68)for  \u003Cbr>this criterion but an alternate composite of Arithmetic Reasoning,Paragraph  \u003Cbr>Comprehension,and Mathematics Knowledge scores produced from multiple re-  \u003Cbr>gression analyses had even higher validity(三=.74).Differential predic-  \u003Cbr>tion for classification purposes is discussed.  \u003Cbr>ABS   |  |  |\n\n32k、身y  \nDD    1473  \nEDITION OF I MOV⁶iS OBSOLETE  \nUNCIASSIFIED  \ni sECUmTYdASS1FICATION GF THIS PAGE(men Data Entered)  \nTechnical Report 594  \n# Evaluation of the ASVAB 8/9/10Clerical Composite for PredictingTraining School Performa","cbCaieaBPEHprKTi","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieaBPEHprKTi","pdf",1409065,28,"English","# Evaluation of the ASVAB 8/9/10 Clerical Composite for Predicting Training School Performance\n## Report overview and purpose\n## Study focus: clerical composite and training performance prediction\n## Results and differential prediction for classification","[{\"question\":\"What test scores were evaluated to predict training school performance?\",\"answer\":\"The report evaluates a clerical composite (CL) derived from ASVAB sub-tests and an alternate regression-based composite using Arithmetic Reasoning, Paragraph Comprehension, and Mathematics Knowledge scores.\"},{\"question\":\"How valid was the clerical composite (CL) for the training performance criterion?\",\"answer\":\"The clerical composite shows high validity, reported as approximately 0.68 for the criterion of training performance.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the report recommend regarding improving the classification composite?\",\"answer\":\"The results suggest adding a mathematics component to the composite to improve prediction of training performance, supporting advice to the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel.\"}]","Evaluation of the ASVAB 8/9/10 Clerical Composite for Predicting Training School Performance - Technical Report 594 | PDF",71]