[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-201299-105":59,"doc-detail-201299-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","evaluation-of-teaching-material-ppg-sm3t-program-in-civilengineering-program-evaluation-results","Evaluation of Teaching Material PPG SM3T Program in CivilEngineering - Program Evaluation Results","","Research evaluates teaching materials of the PPG SM-3T program in civil engineering education using a discrepancy model that compares prescribed standards with real conditions of the materials. The study is motivated by only 11.7% participant pass rates in competency exams. Evaluation standards follow Kemenristekdikti with four components: content feasibility, completeness feasibility, language feasibility, and graph feasibility. Expert validation is performed by civil engineering and Indonesian language experts, yielding weaknesses across several material aspects.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/evaluation-of-teaching-material-ppg-sm3t-program-in-civilengineering-program-evaluation-results/201299/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/evaluation-of-teaching-material-ppg-sm3t-program-in-civilengineering-program-evaluation-results/201299.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Evangeline","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-27","2026-09-04",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem motivates the evaluation of PPG SM-3T teaching materials?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The evaluation is motivated by low competency exam pass rates, where only 11.7% of participants passed. Interviews also indicate weaknesses in the teaching materials.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What evaluation standards and components are used for the teaching materials?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Evaluation uses standards from Kemenristekdikti with four components: content feasibility, completeness feasibility, language feasibility, and graph feasibility.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What evaluation results are reported for different civil engineering teaching material topics?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"For plumbing construction materials, content and completeness feasibility are low, language feasibility is good, and graph feasibility is low. For concrete construction materials, content, completeness, language, and graph feasibility are all very low.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},201299,1788529934,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":143,"preview_page_count":4},13056703019662,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253a8e92610077?_k=1778726343310543188","# Evaluation of Teaching Material PPG SM3T Program in CivilEngineering\n\nYose Fajar Pratama,M.Giatman,Rusnardi Rahmat Putra,and Nurhasan SyahFaculity of Engineering,Padang State University,JI.Prof.Dr.Hamka Air Tawar,Padang,Indonesia  \nKeywords:   Evaluation,Teaching Material,PPG SM3T,Civil Engineering Education,Universitas Negeri Padang  \nAbstract:This research is a research evaluation of the teaching materials of PPG SM-3T Program in civil Engineeringeducation.The background of the evaluation is because only 11.7%of participants passed the competencyexam.The result of interview with several lectures in PPG SM3T program,was found the teaching materialhas weakness,such as,the material no up to date,not source from trust sources and the print quality verypoor.The standard evaluation teaching material use standard from Kemenristekdiki,with 4 components suchas content feasibility,completeness feasibility,language feasibility,and graph feasibility.The evaluationresearch model use discrepancy which compares standard and condition of teaching material PPG SM3TProgram.In research use instrument validation by expert and for evaluation teaching material use expert fromcivil engineering and Indonesia language expert.The result of teaching material plumbing construction,oncontent feasibility is less,completeness feasibility is less,language feasibility good and graphs feasibility isless.The result evaluation teaching material concrete construction,on content feasibility is very little,completeness feasibility is very little,language feasibility very little and graphs feasibility is very little.  \nUniversitas Ngeri Padang is one of theuniversities implementing the PPG SM3T program.Data from SM3T UNP and Belmawa Ristekdiktwebsite shows the number of participants is 206people.The Result Ujian Kompetensi NasionalMahasiswa Pendidikan Profesi Guru(UKMPPG)inUniversitas Negeri Padang only 41.2%or 85 peoplegraduated.Table 1 show the number of participantswho graduated from PPG SM3T program.  \n## 1 INTRODUCTION\n\nEducation problems in Terdepan,Terluar andTertinggal(3T)by Adlim(2016:59),is the lack ofteachers,differences in the quality of education,verypoor educational faclities.Indonesian governmentresolves the education problems in (3T)byimplementing the Sarjana Mendidik di daerah 3T(SM3T).after participants implement the SM3Tprogram,participant can continue to PendidikanProfesi Guru SM3T(PPG SM3T)program for oneyear.  \nTable 1:Number of participants and percentage ofgraduates.  \n\n| No   | Study program   | Number of  \u003Cbr>participants   | Number of  \u003Cbr>participants  \u003Cbr>who pass the  \u003Cbr>exam   | %   |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 1   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Kimia   | 14   | 1   | 7.14   |\n| 2   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Bahasa Inggris   | 22   | 4   | 18.1   |\n| 3   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Geografi   | 18   | 0   | 0%   |\n| 4   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Biologi   | 18   | 18   | 100   |\n| 5   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Fisika   | 18   | 11   | 61.1   |\n\nRepublic of Indonesia Law No.14 of 2005explains the importance of pedagogical,professional,social and personality competencies for teachers andPPG SM3T participants.Pedagogical competence isthe teacher's preparation before learning,and how toevaluate learning.Professional competence is theability of teachers to master subject matter in theirfield of study.Social competence is related to theability of teachers to communicate,interact and adapt.Personality competence includes norms,law andethics that apply in society.  \n\n| 6   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Teknik  \u003Cbr>Bangunan  \u003Cbr>(PTB)   | 17   | 2   | 11.7   |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| 7   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Jasmani,  \u003Cbr>Kesehatan &  \u003Cbr>Rekreasi   | 20   | 17   | 85   |\n| 8   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Anak Usia Dini   | 13   | 10   | 76.9   |\n| 9   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Pancasila dan  \u003Cbr>Kewarganegara  \u003Cbr>an   | 17   | 0   | 0   |\n| 10   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Matematika   | 17   | 4   | 23.5   |\n| 11   | Bimbingan dan  \u003Cbr>Konseling(BK)   | 15   | 1   | 6.66   |\n| 12   | Pendidikan  \u003Cbr>Guru Sek","cbCain5ZbwEDCIGR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCain5ZbwEDCIGR","pdf",603900,"English","# 1 INTRODUCTION\n## Education problems in Terdepan, Terluar, Tertinggal (3T)\n## Law No. 14 of 2005 and teacher competencies\n## Table 1: Number of participants and graduates\n## Teaching material evaluation standards and components","[{\"question\":\"What problem motivates the evaluation of PPG SM-3T teaching materials?\",\"answer\":\"The evaluation is motivated by low competency exam pass rates, where only 11.7% of participants passed. Interviews also indicate weaknesses in the teaching materials.\"},{\"question\":\"What evaluation standards and components are used for the teaching materials?\",\"answer\":\"Evaluation uses standards from Kemenristekdikti with four components: content feasibility, completeness feasibility, language feasibility, and graph feasibility.\"},{\"question\":\"What evaluation results are reported for different civil engineering teaching material topics?\",\"answer\":\"For plumbing construction materials, content and completeness feasibility are low, language feasibility is good, and graph feasibility is low. For concrete construction materials, content, completeness, language, and graph feasibility are all very low.\"}]","Evaluation of Teaching Material PPG SM3T Program in CivilEngineering - Program Evaluation Results | PDF",18]