[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-589284-105":59,"doc-detail-589284-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","engaging-everyone-in-research-ethics-assessment-of-a-workshop-for-engineering-and-computer-science-graduate-students","Engaging Everyone in Research Ethics: Assessment of a Workshop for Engineering and Computer Science Graduate Students","","A workshop model for research and publication ethics was designed for incoming engineering and computer science graduate students at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. The program addressed the challenge of limited shared understanding when universities provide lengthy responsible conduct of research (RCR) training by default. Using a sensemaking framework, the workshop combined lectures on research design and data ethics, publication ethics, computer coding ethics, and intellectual property with expert panel discussions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/engaging-everyone-in-research-ethics-assessment-of-a-workshop-for-engineering-and-computer-science-graduate-students/589284/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/engaging-everyone-in-research-ethics-assessment-of-a-workshop-for-engineering-and-computer-science-graduate-students/589284.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Đào","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why was a short introductory research ethics workshop created for new graduate students?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Many students and advisors lack a shared understanding of research and publication ethics, and without a requirement students are unlikely to prioritize long semester-long RCR training during the first term.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What teaching topics were included in the workshop?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The workshop included lecture content in four priority areas: research design and data ethics, publication ethics, computer coding ethics, and intellectual property.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How did the workshop affect students, according to the assessment?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"After completing the workshop, students showed increased content knowledge and their self-assessed expertise ratings aligned better with their actual knowledge.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},589284,1792252310,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1374402968488,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","| | Ad | vances in Engineering Edu | cation |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  |  |  | |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |\n\n2023: VOLUME 11 ISSUE 4  \nDOI: 10.18260/3-1-1153-36053  \nEngaging Everyone in Research Ethics: Assessment of a Workshop for Engineering and Computer Science Graduate Students  \nSUSAN B. WAINSCOTT MOHAMED B. TRABIA  \nDAVID E. JAMES  \nUniversity of Nevada , Las Vegas Las Vegas, NV  \nABSTRACT  \nHow can we engage new engineering and computer science graduate students in meaningful conversations about research and publication ethics without establishing a common understanding of the issues and expectations? Most universities offer extensive responsible conduct of research (RCR) training programs, which are usually a semester-long. Absent a requirement, it is unlikely that engineering and computer graduate students and their advisors would prioritize a lengthy training during the student’s first semester. Recognizing this, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas’ Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering designed and implemented an introductory research ethics workshop for all graduate students entering engineering and computer science. We engaged an interdisciplinary team of faculty and staff in the workshop’s design and implementation, and approached our design within the sensemaking framework for ethical decision-making. Each workshop included lecture content in four priority topic areas identified by the college faculty: research design and data ethics, publication ethics, computer coding ethics, and intellectual property. The workshops also included a face-to-face panel discussion with experts including engineering, computer science, and law professors; librarians; and technical writers. Our assessment showed that after completing the workshop, students demonstrated increased content knowledge, and their self-assessed expertise ratings were better aligned with their content knowledge.  \nKey words: Research Ethics; Graduate Education; Knowledge Gain  \nINTRODUCTION  \nEngineering and computer science graduate students start their advanced degree programs with a variety of cultural and educational backgrounds and professional experience. Although student  \n58 2023: VOLUME 11 ISSUE 4  \nADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION  \nEngaging Everyone in Research Ethics: Assessment of a Workshop for Engineering and Computer Science Graduate Students  \nparticipation in research and publication of research results is a key component of graduate school in the United States (National Academy of Engineering 1995), many students may have little experience conducting research or be lack knowledge about expectations for ethical conduct in research and publication. While engineering ethics have been required in ABET-accredited undergraduate curricula for more than two decades (Rabins 1998; Hess and Fore 2018), the subject matter in most of these courses does not emphasize research or publishing ethics. Instead, the emphasis is on engineering industrial practice associated with the engineering professional societies’ codes of ethics, such asthe National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics (Hess and Fore 2018; NSPE 2019) . For example, the NSPE Code of Ethics covers topics that reflect engineering practices, such as protection of proprietary information and lawful practice of engineering, but does not mention research conduct (NSPE 2019) . Thus, training on research ethics topics would likely be of benefit to matriculating engineering and computer science graduate students.  \nOne of the frameworks for ethical decision-making shows promise for research ethics training participants who have a wide variety of experience and existing knowledge: sensemaking. In the sensemaking framework for ethical decision-making, there are three considerations: (1) recognition,(2) acknowledgement of complexity, and (3) forecasting outcomes of ethical dilemmas and decisions (Mumford et al. 2008) . Notably, the sensemaking framework acc","cbCaijADUYw7jFn1","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijADUYw7jFn1","pdf",323948,22,"English","# Introduction\n## Rationale for Research Ethics Training\n## Sensemaking Framework for Ethical Decision-Making\n## Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Training Context\n# Workshop Design and Assessment (from Abstract)","[{\"question\":\"Why was a short introductory research ethics workshop created for new graduate students?\",\"answer\":\"Many students and advisors lack a shared understanding of research and publication ethics, and without a requirement students are unlikely to prioritize long semester-long RCR training during the first term.\"},{\"question\":\"What teaching topics were included in the workshop?\",\"answer\":\"The workshop included lecture content in four priority areas: research design and data ethics, publication ethics, computer coding ethics, and intellectual property.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the workshop affect students, according to the assessment?\",\"answer\":\"After completing the workshop, students showed increased content knowledge and their self-assessed expertise ratings aligned better with their actual knowledge.\"}]","Engaging Everyone in Research Ethics: Assessment of a Workshop for Engineering and Computer Science Graduate Students | PDF",1792066896,55]