[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-583389-105":59,"doc-detail-583389-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","efficacy-study-of-varied-catch-up-and-read-tutoring-dosage-schedules-in-a-large-school-district","Efficacy Study of Varied Catch Up and Read Tutoring Dosage Schedules in a Large School District","","A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study evaluates how different Catch Up and Read (CAR) tutoring dosage schedules affect Grades K–3 reading achievement and teacher perceptions in Longhorn School District elementary schools. CAR Classic is delivered after school, while CAR Accelerator varies by meeting days and student grouping scenario. The design compares 10 Classic schools and eight Accelerator schools against 18 non-CAR comparison schools, assessing tutoring impacts, attendance outcomes, subgroup differences, and links between CAR tutoring metrics and reading achievement.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/efficacy-study-of-varied-catch-up-and-read-tutoring-dosage-schedules-in-a-large-school-district/583389/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/efficacy-study-of-varied-catch-up-and-read-tutoring-dosage-schedules-in-a-large-school-district/583389.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What intervention models are evaluated in the study?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The study examines Catch Up and Read (CAR) Classic and CAR Accelerator tutoring programs, including how dosage schedules differ across Accelerator scenarios.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How is the tutoring delivered for CAR Classic versus CAR Accelerator?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"CAR Classic tutoring occurs during after-school sessions, while CAR Accelerator tutoring occurs during the school day with varied meeting schedules and student groupings.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What outcomes does the study analyze?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The study analyzes impacts on reading achievement, attendance, subgroup outcomes, associations between CAR tutoring metrics and reading achievement, and teachers’ experiences and perceptions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},583389,1792191443,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Efficacy Study of Varied Catch Up and Read Tutoring Dosage Schedulesin a Large School District  \nMichael A. Cook, PhD, Jane Eisinger, MS,  \nSteven M. Ross, PhD  \nJanuary 2026  \nEfficacy Study of Varied Catch Up and Read Tutoring Dosage Schedules in a Large School District  \nMichael A. Cook, PhD, Jane Eisinger, MS, Steven M. Ross, PhD  \nCenter for Research and Reform in Education Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2800 N. Charles St  \nBaltimore, MD 21218  \n[https://education.jhu.edu/crre](https://education.jhu.edu/crre)  \nPreferred citation: Cook, M.A. , Eisigner, J. , & Ross, S. M. (2026) . Efficacy study of varied Catch Up and Read tutoring dosage schedules in a large school district. Center for Research and Reform in Education, Johns Hopkins University.  \nNotice of Trademark: “Johns Hopkins University” and “JHU” are registered trademarks. Copyright © 2026 Johns Hopkins University. No part of this report may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, website display, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the Johns Hopkins University Center for Research and Reform in Education. For permission requests, please contact CRRE.  \nContents  \nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 3  \nINTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 5  \n\n| Overview of the Evaluation.............................................................................. 5\u003Cbr>METHOD ................................................................................................................................................ 6 |\n| --- |\n| Research Design .............................................................................................. 6\u003Cbr>Participants ....................................................................................................... 6\u003Cbr>Measures ........................................................................................................... 9\u003Cbr>Analytical Approach....................................................................................... 12\u003Cbr>Procedure........................................................................................................ 13\u003Cbr>RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................. 13 |\n| CAR Tutoring Impacts.................................................................................... 14\u003Cbr>Reading Achievement Impact Analyses................................................................................. 14\u003Cbr>Subgroup Analyses ................................................................................................................ 16\u003Cbr>Attendance Impacts.................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.\u003Cbr>Associations Between CAR Tutoring Metrics and Reading Achievement ............................. 18\u003Cbr>Supplemental CAR Analyses ................................................................................................. 20\u003Cbr>Teacher Experiences with Catch Up and Read............................................ 21\u003Cbr>Teacher Perceptions of Micro-Credentialing ............................................... 33\u003Cbr>Impact of CAR on Teacher Retention ........................................................... 34\u003Cbr>DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................................... 36 |\n\nCAR Efficacy Impacts .................................................................................... 36  \nCAR Subgroup Impacts ................................................................................. 36  \nCAR Program Metrics and","cbCaisahOXefK8T9","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaisahOXefK8T9","pdf",1120155,74,"English","# Executive Summary\n## Overview of the Evaluation\n# Introduction\n## Research Design\n## Results\n## Discussion\n## Conclusions\n# References\n# Appendix A: Teacher Survey\n# Appendix B: Teacher Interview\n# Appendix C: Descriptive and Exploratory Analyses\n# Appendix D: Full Subgroup Regression Analyses\n# Appendix E: Supplementary Analyses\n# Appendix F: Teacher Survey Responses","[{\"question\":\"What intervention models are evaluated in the study?\",\"answer\":\"The study examines Catch Up and Read (CAR) Classic and CAR Accelerator tutoring programs, including how dosage schedules differ across Accelerator scenarios.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the tutoring delivered for CAR Classic versus CAR Accelerator?\",\"answer\":\"CAR Classic tutoring occurs during after-school sessions, while CAR Accelerator tutoring occurs during the school day with varied meeting schedules and student groupings.\"},{\"question\":\"What outcomes does the study analyze?\",\"answer\":\"The study analyzes impacts on reading achievement, attendance, subgroup outcomes, associations between CAR tutoring metrics and reading achievement, and teachers’ experiences and perceptions.\"}]","Efficacy Study of Varied Catch Up and Read Tutoring Dosage Schedules in a Large School District | PDF",1792046965,186]