[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-582678-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":85,"doc-detail-582678-en":134},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":78,"head_meta":80,"extra_data":82,"updated_unix":84},105,"en","effects-of-scaling-up-private-school-choice-programs-on-public-school-students","Effects of Scaling Up Private School Choice Programs on Public School Students","","Programs using public funds to help children attend private schools of choice are expanding in the United States, prompting debate about consequences for students left in public schools. Prior evidence emphasizes short-run effects after program introduction, leaving open how outcomes change when voucher use grows and programs mature. This research studies long-run scale-up of Florida’s Tax Credit Scholarship Program over more than 15 years using matched child-level birth and school records.",{"@graph":14,"@context":77},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/effects-of-scaling-up-private-school-choice-programs-on-public-school-students/582678/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/effects-of-scaling-up-private-school-choice-programs-on-public-school-students/582678.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Mia  ","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69,73],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"Why are private school choice programs controversial for public schools?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The controversy centers on whether private choice encourages public schools to improve or whether it drains resources and causes disadvantages through sorting of students left behind.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What does the study investigate that earlier U.S. research often misses?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It examines long-run scaling up—how outcomes evolve as voucher participation expands—rather than focusing only on the initial one to four years after introduction.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How does the research measure program scale-up and public school student outcomes?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It uses matched child-level birth records and school records to evaluate Florida’s statewide voucher program over about 15 years as participation grew substantially.",{"name":74,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":75},"What key benefits does the study find as public schools face more private school choice exposure?",{"text":76,"@type":64},"Higher exposure is linked to lower suspension and absence rates and higher standardized test scores in reading and math, with the strongest gains among students of comparatively low socioeconomic status.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":79,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":81,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":83,"site_id":7},582678,1792926109,{"code":4,"msg":86,"data":87},"success",[88,92,96,100,104,109,114,118,123,126,130],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},8,30,"research-report",{"id":119,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":121,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":125},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":129},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":131,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":132,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":133},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":86,"data":135},{"doc_id":83,"user_id":136,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":137,"doc_module":4,"category_id":115,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":138,"file_id":139,"file_url":140,"file_type":141,"file_size":142,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":26,"language":143,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":144,"faqs":145,"seo_title":146,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":147,"read_time":55,"preview_page_count":4},687207024478,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","|  |\n| --- |\n| |\n| R E S E A R C HB R I E F S |\n| I N E C O N O M I C P O L I C Y |\n| OctOber 20, 2 02 1 Number 274 |\n\nEffects of Scaling Up Private School Choice Programs on Public School Students  \nBy DaviD N . Fig lio, NorthwesterN UNiversity; CassaNDra M . D . hart, UNiversity oF CaliForNia, Davis ; aND KrzysztoF Kar Bow NiK, eMory UNiversity  \nP  \nrograms using public funds for children to attend private schools of their choice are on the rise in the United States. As of 2019, 25 states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto  \nRico, had voucher or scholarship programs, many of them targeted to specific populations, such as students with disabilities or low-income students. Numerous other states are considering similar programs. Among the most controversial issues associated with private school choice programs involves what happens to the students remaining in public schools. On the one hand, private school choice programs could encourage public schools that might otherwise have been complacent to vigorously improve the education they offer to avoid losing clients to a more affordable private schooling sector. On the other hand, public school students could be harmed by private school  \nchoice programs if the programs drain resources from the public schools or if choice-induced sorting of students disadvantages those remaining in public schools.  \nThese theoretical predictions assume an established program, so it is important to know what happens to traditional public schools as school choice programs expand and mature. For example, we might expect to see the most pronounced effects when a new school choice program is initially announced, as the programs maybe most noticeable when they are new and receiving publicity. But we might also expect the effects of school choice programs to become more pronounced as the programs grow; as schools see a growing share of students opting into choice programs, they may feel more strongly compelled to respond. Furthermore, it is plausible that local competition has a compounding effect at the district level, inducing further gains or losses  \nEditor, JEFFREY MIRON, Harvard University and Cato Institute.  \nto public school students’ outcomes. Another important reason why the scale-up of a voucher program may have different effects from those of the introduction of a program is that longer-run scale-up more strongly implies program permanence. It is not uncommon for policies and programs to change dramatically over time, or to be abolished; for instance, Montana’s tax credit scholarship program was in legal limbo for years due to court challenges. Some programs grow in magnitude, while others remain relatively small pilot programs; still others fluctuate wildly in size due to changing legislative appropriations. Only by studying a program’s growth and development over a long stretch of time can we begin to fully understand how voucher programs alter the public school landscape.  \nNonetheless, nearly all papers written in the U.S. context—including those written to date by this study’s authors—investigate the introduction of school voucher programs rather than study how the programs affect public schools as they approach some longer-run steady state. The weight of the U.S. evidence shows that the introduction of private school voucher programs has small but positive effects on public school students’ test scores. These studies generally focus on the immediate short-run effects, evaluating the first one to four years after the initial introduction of school voucher programs, when both the pros and cons ofthe choice program maybe constrained due to the small number of initial participants. They do not, however, consider what happens when the private school choice program scales up and the number of students using private school vouchers grows to encompass a sizable fraction of the overall student body. To date, with the exception of a pair of informative but singlemarket school-level anal","cbCaiiUb9CCD2N38","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiiUb9CCD2N38","pdf",180429,"English","# Research Brief: In Economic Policy\n## Program scale-up and theoretical concerns\n## Prior evidence and research gap\n## Data and study design\n## Findings on suspensions, absences, and test scores\n## Heterogeneous effects and potential mechanisms","[{\"question\":\"Why are private school choice programs controversial for public schools?\",\"answer\":\"The controversy centers on whether private choice encourages public schools to improve or whether it drains resources and causes disadvantages through sorting of students left behind.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the study investigate that earlier U.S. research often misses?\",\"answer\":\"It examines long-run scaling up—how outcomes evolve as voucher participation expands—rather than focusing only on the initial one to four years after introduction.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the research measure program scale-up and public school student outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"It uses matched child-level birth records and school records to evaluate Florida’s statewide voucher program over about 15 years as participation grew substantially.\"},{\"question\":\"What key benefits does the study find as public schools face more private school choice exposure?\",\"answer\":\"Higher exposure is linked to lower suspension and absence rates and higher standardized test scores in reading and math, with the strongest gains among students of comparatively low socioeconomic status.\"}]","Effects of Scaling Up Private School Choice Programs on Public School Students | PDF",1792044219]