[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-600689-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-600689-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","education-and-treatment-of-children-vol-39-no-4-effects-of-a-tier-3-self-management-intervention-implemented-with-and-without-treatment-integrity","EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN - Vol. 39 - No. 4 - Effects of a Tier 3 Self-Management Intervention Implemented with and without Treatment Integrity","","This study investigated the effects of a Tier 3 peer-matching self-management intervention for two elementary students who had been less responsive to earlier Tier 1 and Tier 2 supports. The Tier 3 package was delivered in general education classrooms and included daily electronic communication between teachers and parents. When implemented with treatment integrity, results showed reduced disruptive behavior and increased total engagement; without integrity, outcomes were variable.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/education-and-treatment-of-children-vol-39-no-4-effects-of-a-tier-3-self-management-intervention-implemented-with-and-without-treatment-integrity/600689/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/education-and-treatment-of-children-vol-39-no-4-effects-of-a-tier-3-self-management-intervention-implemented-with-and-without-treatment-integrity/600689.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"dhado","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What was the purpose of the Tier 3 self-management intervention in this study?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"To evaluate whether a Tier 3 peer-matching self-management approach could improve behavior and engagement for students who had not responded well to Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How was the Tier 3 intervention implemented in the general education classrooms?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It included daily electronic communication between teachers and the students’ parents as part of the peer-matching self-management program.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What role did treatment integrity play in the intervention outcomes?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"When the intervention was implemented with integrity, it effectively reduced disruptive behaviors and increased total engagement; without integrity, results were variable.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},600689,1792172487,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},5909893218464,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016  \nEffects of a Tier 3 Self-Management Intervention Implemented with and without Treatment Integrity  \nAshley Lower  \nK. Richard Young Lynnette Christensen  \nPaul Caldarella  \nLeslie Williams  \nBrigham Young University  \nHoward Wills  \nUniversity of Kansas  \nAbstract  \nThis study investigated the effects of a Tier 3 peer-matching self-management intervention on two elementary school students who had previously been less responsive to Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions. The Tier 3 self-management intervention, which was implemented in the general education classrooms, included daily electronic communication between the teachers and the children’s parents. Results indicated that this intervention effectively reduced disruptive behaviors and increased total engagement when implemented with integrity; without integrity results were variable.  \nKeywords: behavior, Tier 3 intervention, treatment integrity, CW-FIT, selfmanagement, peer-matching, parent involvement, electronic messaging  \nAn increasing number of  \nhavior interventions and  \nschools are implementing positive besupports (PBIS; Horner et al., 2014). PBIS  \nAddress correspondence to: Ashley Lower, Brigham Young University, McKay School of Education, 301 MCKB—BYU Provo, UT 84602. Email: ashley.lower@ [gmail.com](gmail.com).  \nThe research reported in this article was supported in part by a grant from the Institute of Education Sciences and the U.S. Department of Education (R324A120344), awarded to the University of Kansas, with subcontracts to Brigham Young University and Vanderbilt University. The opinions presented in this article are those of the authors, and no endorsement by the agency is intended or implied.  \n494 LOWER et al.  \nis grounded in the assumption that all students can be successful when educators use a tiered system of support and evidenced-based behavioral interventions tailored to meet the needs of students at-risk (Lane, Menzies, Oakes, & Kalberg, 2012; Young, Caldarella, Richardson, & Young, 2012). In support of this, the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2004) included an increased focus on helping students with challenging learning and behavior problems succeed in general education. To achieve this end, schools need to implement interventions across a continuum of support.  \nThe majority of students in a school (70–90%) succeed academically and socially in general education settings (Tier 1), and do not require additional support (Buffum, Mattos, & Weber, 2011). As students’ progress through school, some will be unresponsive to school discipline systems. Students at-risk (5–15%) often need targeted individual or small group attention to be successful (Tier 2). For example, Buffum and colleagues stressed that Tier 2 and 3 interventions provide increased time and/or support in general education classrooms. The remaining students, typically no more than 1–5%, may continue to have difficulty despite additional support and require even more intensive Tier 3 interventions (Young et al., 2012).  \nPBIS is an effective system for decreasing inappropriate behavior (Anderson, Fisher, Marchant, Young, & Smith, 2006). The tiered system provides additional time and support to promote academic success as well as improve classroom behavior (Christensen, Young, & Marchant, 2007). Frequently, Tier 2 and 3 interventions are administered outside of the general education classroom. Successfully implementing Tier 2 and 3 interventions in general education classrooms allows students to continue to access the core curriculum (Basham, Israel, Graden, Poth, & Winston, 2010).  \nClass-wide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT) is a multi-tiered classroom management intervention to improve the behavior of all students (Wills et al., 2010). CW-FIT Tier 1 teaches classroom rules and social skills. It uses a group contingency based on differential reinforcement of appropriate behavi","cbCaicgGgF9NkkEx","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicgGgF9NkkEx","pdf",812095,28,"English","# Abstract\n# Keywords\n# Background and Rationale\n## Tiered PBIS support structure\n## CW-FIT framework and prior evidence\n# Tier 3 Intervention Components\n## Self-management\n## Parent involvement and electronic communication","[{\"question\":\"What was the purpose of the Tier 3 self-management intervention in this study?\",\"answer\":\"To evaluate whether a Tier 3 peer-matching self-management approach could improve behavior and engagement for students who had not responded well to Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the Tier 3 intervention implemented in the general education classrooms?\",\"answer\":\"It included daily electronic communication between teachers and the students’ parents as part of the peer-matching self-management program.\"},{\"question\":\"What role did treatment integrity play in the intervention outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"When the intervention was implemented with integrity, it effectively reduced disruptive behaviors and increased total engagement; without integrity, results were variable.\"}]","EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN - Vol. 39 - No. 4 - Effects of a Tier 3 Self-Management Intervention Implemented with and without Treatment Integrity | PDF",1792091174,71]