[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-508625-105":59,"doc-detail-508625-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","early-outcomes-after-pert-implementation-in-catheter-treated-pulmonary-embolism-in-latin-america","Early Outcomes After PERT Implementation in Catheter-Treated Pulmonary Embolism in Latin America","","Early outcomes after pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) implementation were assessed in inpatients with acute pulmonary embolism treated using catheter-based intervention in a Latin American university hospital. A retrospective cohort compared pre-PERT (2004–2020) and PERT eras (2021–2025). Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding, were evaluated. Results in 47 patients showed lower 30-day MACE in the PERT era and reduced 30-day mortality, with few differences in other event rates.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/early-outcomes-after-pert-implementation-in-catheter-treated-pulmonary-embolism-in-latin-america/508625/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/early-outcomes-after-pert-implementation-in-catheter-treated-pulmonary-embolism-in-latin-america/508625.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aditya","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-10","2026-10-05",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What was the primary goal of the study after implementing a PERT?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"To evaluate the association between PERT implementation and 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with catheter-based intervention.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How was the study designed and who was included?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"A retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients treated with catheter-based intervention from 2004 to 2025. Patients were stratified into a pre-PERT period (2004–2020) and a PERT period (2021–2025).",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What were the key findings regarding 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Thirty-day MACE occurred in 38.5% of patients in the pre-PERT era versus 4.8% in the PERT era, with lower odds and a significant p-value. Thirty-day mortality was also reduced in the PERT era, while myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding remained low and not significantly different.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},508625,1791565653,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":81,"preview_page_count":4},962085564549,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Early outcomes after PERT implementation in catheter-treated pulmonary embolism in Latin America  \nDamonte JI, Telayna JM (h), Telayna JM, Bonorino J, Bilbao J, Costantini R  \nInstituto de Cardiología y Terapéutica Cardiovascular, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina  \nAims  \nTo assess the association between pulmonary embolism response team implementation and 30-day clinical outcomes inpatients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with catheterbased intervention in a university hospital in Latin America  \nMethods  \nRetrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with catheter-based intervention, between 2004 and 2025 in a university hospital in Latin America, representing an early national experience with a pulmonary embolism response team programme (PERT) . Patients were stratified according to treatment era (pre–PERT team (between 2004-2020) vs PERT era (2021-2025) . The primary endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding (BARC grade 3 or higher) .  \nResults  \nA total of 47 patients were included, 26 (55%) in the pre–PERT team era and 21 (45%) in the PERT team era . According to ESC risk stratification, all patients belonged to high (21 [45%)] or intermediate–high risk (26 [55%]) .  \nResults  \nBaseline risk profile differed between eras, with a higher proportion of ESC high-risk patients 17 (65%) vs 4 (19%); p=0.003) in the pre-PERT group, whereas right ventricular dysfunction and cardiac biomarkers (troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide) were similar between groups . Patients treated in the PERT era more frequently received dedicated thrombectomy devices (14 (53.8%) vs 21 (100.0%); p=0.001) .  \nThirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 10 (38.5%) patients in the pre–PERT team era versus 1 (4.8%) in the PERT team era (odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.002– 0.70; p=0.013) . Thirty-day mortality was lower in the PERT team era 8 (30%) vs 0 (0%); p=0.006), while rates of myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleeding were low and did not differ significantly between groups .  \nResults  \n30-day MACE  \n38% → 9%  \nPre-PERT vs PERT (p=0.04)  \n\n| 30 days outcomes | Pre-PERT\u003Cbr>N = 26 | PERT\u003Cbr>N = 21 | p-value |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Death | 8 (31%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.006 |\n| Myocardial infarction | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | — |\n| Stroke | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | — |\n| Major bleeding (BARC ≥3) | 2 (8%) | 1 (5%) | 1.000 |\n\nLimitations  \nThe limitations of this study include the small sample size and retrospective nature of this observation leading to potential for selection or data collection bias.  \nConclusions  \nIn this observational before–after cohort of intermediate/high and high-risk pulmonary embolism patients treated with catheter-based intervention in a Latin American university hospital, PERT team implementation was associated with a lower incidence of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events. In addition, PERT team implementation was associated with a change in the clinical profile of treated patients, with a greater proportion of intermediate–high risk pulmonary embolism patients undergoing catheter-based intervention. These findings represent early real-world evidence on PERT team implementation and should be warranting confirmation in larger prospective studies","cbCairtZRWXf4MBR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairtZRWXf4MBR","pdf",390803,"English","# Aims\n# Methods\n# Results\n## 30-day MACE and outcomes\n# Limitations\n# Conclusions","[{\"question\":\"What was the primary goal of the study after implementing a PERT?\",\"answer\":\"To evaluate the association between PERT implementation and 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with catheter-based intervention.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the study designed and who was included?\",\"answer\":\"A retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients treated with catheter-based intervention from 2004 to 2025. Patients were stratified into a pre-PERT period (2004–2020) and a PERT period (2021–2025).\"},{\"question\":\"What were the key findings regarding 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events?\",\"answer\":\"Thirty-day MACE occurred in 38.5% of patients in the pre-PERT era versus 4.8% in the PERT era, with lower odds and a significant p-value. Thirty-day mortality was also reduced in the PERT era, while myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding remained low and not significantly different.\"}]","Early Outcomes After PERT Implementation in Catheter-Treated Pulmonary Embolism in Latin America | PDF",1791230103]