[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-121430-en":3,"doc-seo-121430-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},121430,962075114101,"Seraphina","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/e000253a75eb197efd?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780044092746381165",8,"Research & Report","Early Leak and Burst Detection in Water Pipeline Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches - Research","Leakages in water distribution networks create major water wastage and higher operational costs, while conventional detection techniques struggle with complex or subtle patterns and often cannot reliably distinguish conditions. A comprehensive study compares fourteen machine learning algorithms using multi-class classification on data collected from an experimental site under leak, major leak, and no-leak scenarios. Performance is assessed with metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, showing strong results for Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Decision Tree. The findings support scalable, automated detection of leaks and bursts for real-time monitoring, improved infrastructure management, and more sustainable water resource use.","Early Leak and Burst Detection in Water Pipeline Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches  \nThis is the Published version of the following publication  \nJoseph, Kiran, Shetty, Jyoti, Patnaik, Rahul, Matthew, Noel S, van Staden, Rudi, Liyanage, Wasantha P, Powell, Grant, Bennett, Nathan and Sharma, Ashok (2025) Early Leak and Burst Detection in Water Pipeline Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches. Water, 17 (14) . p. 2164. ISSN 2073- 4441  \nThe publisher’s official version can be found at [https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142164](https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142164)  \nNote that access to this version may require subscription.  \nDownloaded from VU Research Repository [https://vuir.vu.edu.au/49536/](https://vuir.vu.edu.au/49536/)  \nArticle  \nEarly Leak and Burst Detection in Water Pipeline Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches  \nKiran Joseph 1,2, Jyoti Shetty 3, Rahul Patnaik 3, Noel S. Matthew 3, Rudi Van Staden 1, Wasantha P. Liyanage 1, Grant Powell 2, Nathan Bennett 2 and Ashok K. Sharma 1, *  \nAcademic Editors: Gui Jin, Jun Yang and Hongwei Zhang  \nReceived: 14 May 2025  \nRevised: 3 July 2025  \nAccepted: 11 July 2025  \nPublished: 21 July 2025  \nCitation: Joseph, K.; Shetty, J.; Patnaik, R.; Matthew, N.S.; Van Staden, R.; Liyanage, W.P.; Powell, G.; Bennett, N.; Sharma, A.K. Early Leak and Burst Detection in Water Pipeline Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches. Water 2025, 17, 2164 . [https://doi.org/10.3390/](https://doi.org/10.3390/)[ ](https://doi.org/10.3390/)w17142164  \nCopyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ([https://creativecommons.org/](https://creativecommons.org/)[ ](https://creativecommons.org/)[licenses/by/4.0/](licenses/by/4.0/)) .  \n1 Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia; [kiran.joseph2@live.vu.edu.au](kiran.joseph2@live.vu.edu.au) (K.J.); [rudi.vanstaden@vu.edu.au](rudi.vanstaden@vu.edu.au) (R.V.S.); [wasantha.pallewelaliyanage@vu.edu.au](wasantha.pallewelaliyanage@vu.edu.au) (W.P.L.)  \n2 Greater Western Water, Melbourne, VIC 3429, Australia; [grant.powell@gww.com.au](grant.powell@gww.com.au) (G.P.); [nathan.bennett@gww.com.au](nathan.bennett@gww.com.au) (N.B.)  \n3 RV College of Engineering, Mysore Road, Bengaluru 560059, India; [jyothis@rvce.edu.in](jyothis@rvce.edu.in) (J.S.); [rahulpatnaik.cd23@rvce.edu.in](rahulpatnaik.cd23@rvce.edu.in) (R.P.); [noelshajimathew.cd23@rvce.edu.in](noelshajimathew.cd23@rvce.edu.in) (N.S.M.)  \n* Correspondence: [ashok.sharma@vu.edu.au](ashok.sharma@vu.edu.au)  \nAbstract  \nLeakages in water distribution networks pose a formidable challenge, often leading to substantial water wastage and escalating operational costs. Traditional methods for leak detection often fall short, particularly when dealing with complex or subtle data patterns. To address this, a comprehensive comparison of fourteen machine learning algorithms was conducted, with evaluation based on key performance metrics such as multi-class classification metrics, micro and macro averages, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The data, collected from an experimental site under leak, major leak, and no-leak scenarios, was used to perform multi-class classification. The results highlight the superiority of models such as Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Decision Tree in detecting leaks with high accuracy and robustness. Multiple models effectively captured the nuances in the data and accurately predicted the presence of a leak, burst, or no leak, thus automating leak detection and contributing to water conservation efforts. This research demonstrates the practical benefits of applying machine learning models in water distribution systems, offering scalable solutions for real-time leak detection. Furthermore, it emphasises the role of machine learning in modernising i","cbCairfrmcDtok82","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairfrmcDtok82","pdf",3282920,1,19,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n## Challenges of traditional leak management\n## Move toward integrated proactive solutions","[{\"question\":\"Why do traditional leak detection methods struggle in water pipeline networks?\",\"answer\":\"Traditional approaches can be labor-intensive, limited by environmental noise, and less effective in complex or buried infrastructures, and they often do not precisely locate leaks.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the study evaluate machine learning models for leak and burst detection?\",\"answer\":\"It compares fourteen machine learning algorithms using multi-class classification on experimental data and evaluates outcomes with metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, micro/macro averages, and F1-score.\"},{\"question\":\"Which machine learning models showed the best performance in detecting leaks?\",\"answer\":\"The results highlight superior performance from Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Decision Tree, demonstrating high accuracy and robustness.\"}]","Early Leak and Burst Detection in Water Pipeline Networks Using Machine Learning Approaches - Research | PDF",1785735628,48,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":34,"description":14,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":28},"early-leak-and-burst-detection-in-water-pipeline-networks-using-machine-learning-approaches-research","",{"@graph":36,"@context":85},[37,54,68],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/early-leak-and-burst-detection-in-water-pipeline-networks-using-machine-learning-approaches-research/121430/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-08-03",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"Why do traditional leak detection methods struggle in water pipeline networks?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"Traditional approaches can be labor-intensive, limited by environmental noise, and less effective in complex or buried infrastructures, and they often do not precisely locate leaks.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"How does the study evaluate machine learning models for leak and burst detection?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"It compares fourteen machine learning algorithms using multi-class classification on experimental data and evaluates outcomes with metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, micro/macro averages, and F1-score.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"Which machine learning models showed the best performance in detecting leaks?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"The results highlight superior performance from Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Decision Tree, demonstrating high accuracy and robustness.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":87,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,97,101,105,110,115,120,123,128,131,135],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":47,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},30,"research-report",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":127},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":126,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":130},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":132,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":132,"slug":134},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":21,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":136,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":137},"General","general"]