[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-596661-105":59,"doc-detail-596661-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","early-contributions-to-the-evolution-of-the-canadian-scientific-integrity-system-institutional-and-governmental-interaction-in-the-policy-diffusion-process","Early Contributions to the Evolution of the Canadian Scientific Integrity System - Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process","","Academic institutions and research funders have devoted significant effort over the past decade to policies that strengthen academic integrity and prevent misconduct. This study assesses how initiatives by Canadian federal and provincial (Québec) funders influence institutional research integrity/misconduct (RIM) policy development. Analysis of 32 institutional RIM policies finds stronger effects from federal initiatives, while provincial initiatives show less impact. The results indicate a complex, partially insulated policy system and support greater consistency when developing or updating RIM policies.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/early-contributions-to-the-evolution-of-the-canadian-scientific-integrity-system-institutional-and-governmental-interaction-in-the-policy-diffusion-process/596661/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/early-contributions-to-the-evolution-of-the-canadian-scientific-integrity-system-institutional-and-governmental-interaction-in-the-policy-diffusion-process/596661.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Muffet","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does the study investigate about research integrity policies in Canada?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It examines how initiatives from Canadian federal and provincial (Québec) research funders affect the development of institutional research integrity/misconduct (RIM) policies.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What relationship does the study find between federal and provincial initiatives and RIM policy development?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Federal initiatives appear to have the greatest impact on RIM policy development, while provincial initiatives do not show the same effect.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why do the authors argue the policy system is complex?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Idiosyncrasies in creation dates and the lack of evidence for systematic patterns in modification dates suggest a complex system often insulated from some government initiatives.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},596661,1792171024,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":56,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962090768927,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","CSSHE  \nSCÉES  \nCanadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d’enseignement supérieur Volume 46, No. 1, 2016, pages 57-75  \nEarly Contributions to the Evolution  \nof the Canadian Scientific Integrity System: Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process  \nJordan Richard Schoenherr Carleton University  \nBryn Williams-Jones University of Montréal  \nAbstract  \nAcademic institutions and research funders have in the last decade devoted considerable effort to developing policies to support academic integrity and prevent misconduct. In this study, we consider the extent to which various initiatives of Canadian federal and provincial (Québec) funders have affected the development of institutional research integrity/misconduct (RIM) policies. Examining the creation and modification dates of 32 institutional RIM policies, we find that federal but not provincial initiatives appear to have the greatest impact on the development of RIM policies. Idiosyncrasies in the creation dates, as well as lack of evidence of a systematic pattern in modification dates, suggest a complex system that is often insulated from certain government initiatives. These results lead us to conclude that there should be greater consistency in the development or updating of RIM policies to ensure the appropriate treatment of misconduct and to encourage behaviour that meets the highest standards of research integrity.  \nRésumé  \nAu cours de la dernière décennie, les institutions académiques et les bailleurs de fonds de recherche ont consacré beaucoup d’efforts à l’élaboration de  \nFederal and Institutional Integrity System / J. R. Schoenherr & B. Williams-Jones 58  \npolitiques pour soutenir l’intégrité scientifique et prévenir les inconduites en recherche. Dans la présente étude, nous analysons dans quelle mesure les diverses initiatives des bailleurs de fonds canadiens, tant fédéraux que provinciaux (Québec), ont affecté l’élaboration de politiques institutionnelles sur l’intégrité et les inconduites en recherche (IIR) . En examinant les dates de création et de modification de 32 politiques institutionnelles sur l’IIR, nous constatons que ce sont les initiatives fédérales, et non provinciales, qui semblent avoir le plus grand effet sur l’élaboration de politiques. Des idiosyncrasies dans les dates de création, ainsi que l’absence de preuves d’un modèle systématique de dates de modification, suggèrent un système complexe, souvent isolé de certaines initiatives gouvernementales. Ces résultats nous amènent à conclure qu’il devrait y avoir une plus grande cohérence dans l’élaboration oulamise à jour de politiques sur l’IIR pour assurer le traitementapproprié des inconduites et encourager un comportement qui répond aux normes les plus élevées d’intégrité en recherche.  \nIntroduction  \nConcern on the part of academics, institutions, funders and the public regarding the integrity of research findings and practices has been stimulated in part by high-profile and mediatised cases of misconduct (e.g., Callaway, 2011; Jasanoff, 2010; Lock, Wells,& Farthing, 2001; Medawar, 1976; Normile, 2014; Snyder & Loring, 2006) . In the North American context, the US government initiated concerted efforts in the 1980s to study the governance mechanisms (i.e., policies and procedures) of research integrity systems within American research institutions (CHPS Consulting, 2000; Greene, Durch, Horwitz,& Hooper, 1985; Lind, 2005) . This led in the United States to the development of an active research community studying integrity (also known as the responsible conduct of research), and to the development and implementation of formal governance structures at both the federal (e.g., the Office of Research Integrity) and state levels, as well as in institutions, to address research integrity/misconduct (RIM; e.g., LaFollette, 1994; Steneck, 1994) .  \nIn comparison with the United States, Canada’s RIM policy landscape is much less clear, in large part because th","cbCaij7XqOHbUZo6","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaij7XqOHbUZo6","pdf",307783,"English","# Abstract\n# Introduction","[{\"question\":\"What does the study investigate about research integrity policies in Canada?\",\"answer\":\"It examines how initiatives from Canadian federal and provincial (Québec) research funders affect the development of institutional research integrity/misconduct (RIM) policies.\"},{\"question\":\"What relationship does the study find between federal and provincial initiatives and RIM policy development?\",\"answer\":\"Federal initiatives appear to have the greatest impact on RIM policy development, while provincial initiatives do not show the same effect.\"},{\"question\":\"Why do the authors argue the policy system is complex?\",\"answer\":\"Idiosyncrasies in creation dates and the lack of evidence for systematic patterns in modification dates suggest a complex system often insulated from some government initiatives.\"}]","Early Contributions to the Evolution of the Canadian Scientific Integrity System - Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process | PDF",1792083496,48]