[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-602188-105":59,"doc-detail-602188-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","durability-and-debate-how-state-level-policy-actors-frame-school-choice-602188","Durability and Debate - How State-Level Policy Actors Frame School Choice","","School choice policies have become a prominent feature of K-12 education, reflecting the broader institutionalization of market-based political ideology in education. This qualitative multiple case study uses framing theory and interviews with 57 state-level education policy actors to analyze ongoing debate in five U.S. states. Findings identify five framing patterns—quality, equity, liberty, plurality, and innovation—along with critiques. Results show how the flexibility and broad appeal of “choice” help explain durability despite controversy.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/durability-and-debate-how-state-level-policy-actors-frame-school-choice-602188/602188/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/durability-and-debate-how-state-level-policy-actors-frame-school-choice-602188/602188.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"acoobca","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the main focus of this study on school choice?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The study examines how state-level policy actors frame school choice messages and how responses to those arguments shape an ongoing debate across five U.S. states.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which theoretical approach guides the analysis?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Framing theory guides the analysis of how the school choice debate is constructed in political discourse.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What patterns of framing are identified in the results?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The study finds five patterns of framing school choice as beneficial: quality, equity, liberty, plurality, and innovation, along with critiques of these frames.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},602188,1792422810,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747870733,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","| education policy analysis archives\u003Cbr>A peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal | \u003Cbr>Arizona State University |\n| --- | --- |\n| Volume 31 Number 64 June 6, 2023 ISSN 1068-2341 |  |\n\nDurability and Debate:  \nHow State-Level Policy Actors Frame School Choice  \nEupha Jeanne Daramola  \nUniversity of California, Santa Barbara  \nTaylor N. Allbright  \nCalifornia State Polytechnic University, Pomona  \nJulie A. Marsh  \nUniversity of Southern California  \nHuriya Jabbar  \nUniversity of Texas at Austin  \n&  \nKate E. Kennedy  \nRAND Corporation  \nUnited States  \nCitation: Daramola, E. J., Allbright, T. N., Marsh, J. A. Jabbar, H., & Kennedy, K. E. (2023) . Durability and debate: How state-level policy actors frame school choice. Education Policy Analysis  \nArchives, 31(64). [https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7749](https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7749)  \nAbstract: School choice policies have become a prominent feature of K-12 education in recent decades, reflecting the broader institutionalization of market-based political ideology in education. In this qualitative multiple case study, we draw on framing theory and interviews with 57 state-level education policy actors to explore the nature of the continued debate over school choice in five U.S. states. We find five patterns of framing choice as beneficial, centering around five purported goals– quality, equity, liberty, plurality, and innovation–along with critiques of these frames. Our findings  \nillustrate that despite the contested nature of these policies, the broad appeal and flexibility of“choice”’ helps to explain its durability.  \nKeywords: school choice; policy analysis; case studies  \nDurabilidad y debate: Cómo los actores políticos a nivel estatal enmarcan la elección de escuela  \nResumen: Las políticas de elección de escuela se han convertido en una característica destacada de la educación K-12 en las últimas décadas, lo que refleja la institucionalizaciónmás amplia de la ideología política basada en el mercado en la educación. En este estudio cualitativo de casos múltiples, nos basamos en la teoría del encuadre y entrevistas con 57 actores de políticas educativas a nivel estatal para explorar la naturaleza del debate continuo sobre la elección de escuela en cinco estados de EE. UU. Encontramos cinco patrones de elección de encuadre como beneficiosos, centrados en cinco supuestosobjetivos: calidad, equidad, libertad, pluralidad e innovación, junto con críticas a estosencuadres. Nuestros hallazgos ilustran que, a pesar de la naturaleza cuestionada de estas políticas, el amplio atractivo y la flexibilidad de la “elección” ayuda a explicar su durabilidad.  \nPalabras-clave: elección de escuela; análisis de políticas; estudios de caso  \nDurabilidade e debate: Como os atores políticos em nível estadual enquadram aescolha da escola  \nResumo: As políticas de escolha escolar tornaram-se uma característica proeminente daeducação K-12 nas últimas décadas, refletindo a institucionalização mais ampla da ideologia política baseada no mercado na educação. Neste estudo de caso múltiplo qualitativo, utilizamos a teoria do enquadramento e entrevistas com 57 atores da política educacional em nível estadual para explorar a natureza do debate contínuo sobre a escolhada escola em cinco estados dos EUA. Encontramos cinco padrões de escolha de enquadramento como benéficos, centrados em torno de cinco objetivos pretendidos – qualidade, equidade, liberdade, pluralidade e inovação – juntamente com críticas a essesenquadramentos. Nossas descobertas ilustram que, apesar da natureza contestada dessas políticas, o amplo apelo e a flexibilidade da “escolha” ajudam a explicar sua durabilidade. Palavras-chave: escolha escolar; análise de políticas; estudos de caso  \nDurability and Debate:  \nHow State-Level Policy Actors Frame School Choice  \nBy the early 21st century, many prominent education policymakers viewed school choice as a primary solution to the problem of low-performing and ine","cbCaifDNbXwIi8Sp","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifDNbXwIi8Sp","pdf",505569,28,"English","# Introduction\n# Framing School Choice Debates\n## Policy actors and communication messages\n# Findings: Framing Patterns and Critiques\n# Durability of School Choice","[{\"question\":\"What is the main focus of this study on school choice?\",\"answer\":\"The study examines how state-level policy actors frame school choice messages and how responses to those arguments shape an ongoing debate across five U.S. states.\"},{\"question\":\"Which theoretical approach guides the analysis?\",\"answer\":\"Framing theory guides the analysis of how the school choice debate is constructed in political discourse.\"},{\"question\":\"What patterns of framing are identified in the results?\",\"answer\":\"The study finds five patterns of framing school choice as beneficial: quality, equity, liberty, plurality, and innovation, along with critiques of these frames.\"}]","Durability and Debate - How State-Level Policy Actors Frame School Choice | PDF",1792094194,71]