[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-497497-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-497497-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","draft-scoring-guide-for-2026-districtschool-performance-frameworks-based-upon-2025-results","Draft Scoring Guide for 2026 District/School Performance Frameworks - based upon 2025 results","","Draft scoring guide defining performance indicators and point values for 2026 district and school performance frameworks, anchored to 2025 results. It specifies rating tiers and corresponding points for academic achievement and ELP on-track growth, academic growth, postsecondary and workforce readiness, and dropout/matriculation/graduation outcomes. It also provides percentile-based cut-points and detailed breakdowns for calculating total possible points across achievement, growth, ELP growth, and postsecondary readiness, including plan or accreditation category thresholds for district and school.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/","Exam",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/draft-scoring-guide-for-2026-districtschool-performance-frameworks-based-upon-2025-results/497497/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/draft-scoring-guide-for-2026-districtschool-performance-frameworks-based-upon-2025-results/497497.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"A glass of water","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-02",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":30},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"How are rating tiers and points determined for Academic Achievement and ELP On Track Growth?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The guide maps percentile thresholds to ratings (Exceeds, Meets, Approaching, Does Not Meet) and assigns point values for all students and each disaggregated group, including ELP on-track growth contributions.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What indicators are included under Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"It includes mean CO SAT Reading and Writing (EBRW) and CO SAT Math scale-score targets over 1-year and 3-year windows, plus dropout rate, matriculation rate, and graduation rate measures.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How is the total possible points score computed across the framework?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"The document specifies total possible points by indicator: achievement, growth (including ELP growth and ELP on-track growth), and postsecondary readiness, with different weighting for elementary/middle versus high/district contexts.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},497497,1792218850,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,94,99,104,109,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},70,"exam",{"id":95,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":100,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":33,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":30,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":22,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":30,"preview_page_count":4},962090760832,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","| DRAFT Scoring Guide for 2026 District/School Performance Frameworks (based upon 2025 results) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Performance Indicator | Measure/Metric |  |  | Rating | Point Value |  |  |  |\n| \u003Cbr>Academic Achievement & ELP On Track Growth | Mean Scale Score was: |  |  |  | All Students | Each Disaggregated Group |  | ELP On Track Growth |\n|  | • at or above the 85th percentile |  |  | Exceeds | 8 | 1.00 |  | 2.0 |\n|  | • at or above the 50th percentile but below the 85th percentile |  |  | Meets | 6 | 0.75 |  | 1.5 |\n|  | • at or above the 15th percentile but below the 50th percentile |  |  | Approaching | 4 | 0.50 |  | 1.0 |\n|  | • below the 15th percentile |  |  | Does Not Meet | 2 | 0.25 |  | 0.5 |\n|  | Students Previously Identified for a READ Plan (bonus point) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | • CMAS ELA Mean scale score at or above 725 (Approaching Expectations cut-score) |  |  |  | 1 bonus point |  |  |  |\n| \u003Cbr>Academic Growth | Median Growth Percentile was: |  |  |  | All Students | Each Disaggregated Group |  | ELP |\n|  | • at or above 65 |  |  | Exceeds | 8 | 1.00 |  | 2.0 |\n|  | • at or above 50 but below 65 |  |  | Meets | 6 | 0.75 |  | 1.5 |\n|  | • at or above 35 but below 50 |  |  | Approaching | 4 | 0.50 |  | 1.0 |\n|  | • below 35 |  |  | Does Not Meet | 2 | 0.25 |  | 0.5 |\n| Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness | Mean CO SATReading and Writing (EBRW) scale score was**: |  |  |  | All Students |  | Each Disaggregated Group |  |\n|  |  | 1-Year | 3-Year |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | • at or above | 553.1 | 553.6 | Exceeds | 4 |  | 1.00 |  |\n|  | • below previous cut but at or above | 494.6 | 496.4 | Meets | 3 |  | 0.75 |  |\n|  | • below previous cut but at or above | 448.1 | 455.8 | Approaching | 2 |  | 0.50 |  |\n|  | • below | 448.1 | 455.8 | Does Not Meet | 1 |  | 0.25 |  |\n|  | Mean CO SAT Math scale score was**: | 1-Year | 3-Year |  | All Students |  | Each Disaggregated Group |  |\n|  | • at or above | 527.0 | 523.3 | Exceeds | 4 |  | 1.00 |  |\n|  | • below previous cut but at or above | 465.8 | 466.0 | Meets | 3 |  | 0.75 |  |\n|  | • below previous cut but at or above | 423.3 | 426.4 | Approaching | 2 |  | 0.50 |  |\n|  | • below | 423.3 | 426.4 | Does Not Meet | 1 |  | 0.25 |  |\n|  | Dropout Rate: The district or school dropout rate was (of all schools in 2017): |  |  |  | All Students |  | Each Disaggregated Group |  |\n|  | • at or below 0.5% |  |  | Exceeds | 8 |  | 2.0 |  |\n|  | • at or below 2.0% but above 0.5% |  |  | Meets | 6 |  | 1.5 |  |\n|  | • at or below 5.0% but above 2.0% |  |  | Approaching | 4 |  | 1.0 |  |\n|  | • above 5.0% |  |  | Does Not Meet | 2 |  | 0.5 |  |\n|  | Matriculation Rate (of all schools in 2018): |  |  |  | All Students |  |  |  |\n|  | • at or above the 75.8% |  |  | Exceeds | 4 |  |  |  |\n|  | • at or above 61. 1% but below 75.8% |  |  | Meets | 3 |  |  |  |\n|  | • at or above 46.8% but below 61. 1% |  |  | Approaching | 2 |  |  |  |\n|  | • below 46.8% |  |  | Does Not Meet | 1 |  |  |  |\n|  | Graduation Rate and Disaggregated Graduation Rate (Best of 4-, 5-, 6-, or 7-year): |  |  |  | All Students |  | Each Disaggregated Group |  |\n|  | • at or above 95.0% |  |  | Exceeds | 8 |  | 2.0 |  |\n|  | • at or above 85.0% but below 95.0% |  |  | Meets | 6 |  | 1.5 |  |\n|  | • at or above 75.0% but below 85.0% |  |  | Approaching | 4 |  | 1.0 |  |\n|  | • below 75.0% |  |  | Does Not Meet | 2 |  | 0.5 |  |\n\n| \u003Cbr>Academic Achievement: Mean Scale Score by Percentile Cut-Points\u003Cbr>The Academic Achievement Indicator reflects achievement as measured by the mean scale score on Colorado's standardized assessments. The presented targets for the Achievement Indicators have been established utilizing baseline year data. * |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Percentile | English Language Arts & Reading & Writing for CO PSAT |  |  |  | Mathematics |  |  |  | Science","cbCaihdhRYcaXdsK","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihdhRYcaXdsK","pdf",172336,"English","# Performance Indicator Ratings and Point Values\n## Academic Achievement & ELP On Track Growth\n## Academic Growth\n## Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness\n## Dropout Rate, Matriculation Rate, and Graduation Rate\n# Achievement Targets by Percentile Cut-Points\n## Academic Achievement: Mean Scale Score by Percentile\n## ELP Growth Targets by Percentile\n# Calculation Cut-Points and Total Possible Points\n## Cut-Points for Each Performance Indicator\n## Total Possible Points by Performance Indicator\n## Cut-Points for Plan/Category Type Assignment","[{\"question\":\"How are rating tiers and points determined for Academic Achievement and ELP On Track Growth?\",\"answer\":\"The guide maps percentile thresholds to ratings (Exceeds, Meets, Approaching, Does Not Meet) and assigns point values for all students and each disaggregated group, including ELP on-track growth contributions.\"},{\"question\":\"What indicators are included under Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness?\",\"answer\":\"It includes mean CO SAT Reading and Writing (EBRW) and CO SAT Math scale-score targets over 1-year and 3-year windows, plus dropout rate, matriculation rate, and graduation rate measures.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the total possible points score computed across the framework?\",\"answer\":\"The document specifies total possible points by indicator: achievement, growth (including ELP growth and ELP on-track growth), and postsecondary readiness, with different weighting for elementary/middle versus high/district contexts.\"}]","Draft Scoring Guide for 2026 District/School Performance Frameworks - based upon 2025 results | PDF",1790957874]