[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33189":3,"doc-seo-33189":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33189,4398048949847,"Eliana","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002536579ef2da7f?_k=1778318612642679267",8,"Research & Report","Donald Smith Mereology without Weak Supplementation 2009","The paper argues against the Weak Supplementation Principle (WSP), a standard axiom in mereology. It motivates WSP denial independently of endurantism’s truth, using an endurantist response to a time-travel building scenario and a challenge involving multiple-location at a single time. The discussion explains WSP’s initial appeal, shows that rejecting WSP need not disrupt other parts of mereology, and concludes that WSP’s falsity remains consistent with WSP’s guiding motivation about differences between composites and proper parts.","cbCaieH2i51zK5zB","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaieH2i51zK5zB","pdf",182250,1,6,"English","en","# Introduction\n# E&R’s Challenge and the Possibility of Multiple-Location\n# The Reasonability of Denying WSP","[{\"question\":\"What does the Weak Supplementation Principle (WSP) claim in mereology?\",\"answer\":\"WSP holds that any object with a proper part has another distinct proper part that does not overlap the first proper part.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the paper use E\\u0026R’s challenge to argue against WSP?\",\"answer\":\"It builds on a time-travel wall scenario to show that the core tension is not endurantism itself but the possibility of multiple-location at a single time, which motivates denying WSP.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the author consider denying WSP to be reasonable?\",\"answer\":\"The author argues that WSP is neither analytic nor a conceptually forced truth, and that its common role as an axiom in many formal mereological systems should carry limited weight.\"}]",1782204352,15,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"donald-smith-mereology-without-weak-supplementation-2009","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/donald-smith-mereology-without-weak-supplementation-2009/33189/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What does the Weak Supplementation Principle (WSP) claim in mereology?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"WSP holds that any object with a proper part has another distinct proper part that does not overlap the first proper part.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How does the paper use E&R’s challenge to argue against WSP?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It builds on a time-travel wall scenario to show that the core tension is not endurantism itself but the possibility of multiple-location at a single time, which motivates denying WSP.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Why does the author consider denying WSP to be reasonable?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The author argues that WSP is neither analytic nor a conceptually forced truth, and that its common role as an axiom in many formal mereological systems should carry limited weight.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]