[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-598561-105":59,"doc-detail-598561-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","discussing-comedy-an-interrogative-approach","Discussing Comedy - an Interrogative Approach","","A scholarly discussion of narrative and dramatic comedy presents an interrogative toolkit for analyzing comedic works in class or independent reading. Drawing on a course history that includes authors and plays from Plautus through modern film and television, the text reframes comedy analysis beyond the question of “why it is funny.” It organizes discussion around historical and literary determinants and extends to plot mechanics, including fortune, intrigue, resolutions, and genre-specific patterns of order, disorder, and transformation.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":15,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/discussing-comedy-an-interrogative-approach/598561/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/discussing-comedy-an-interrogative-approach/598561.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"A glass of water","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-20","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the main analytical goal of the interrogative approach to comedy?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"To provide a set of questions that helps readers take comedy seriously and move beyond asking only “why is this funny.”","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the text handle historical context when analyzing comedic humor?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It argues that humor often depends on historical and social differences that may no longer be understood, affecting reception, character dynamics, and what audiences consider laughable.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What plot-related questions does the text propose for comedy?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It considers how events are ordered, how intrigue and scheming interact with fortune, and how comedies manage resolution—often through transformation near the end rather than in an orderly novel-like way.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},598561,1792390372,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":14,"category_name":15,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090760832,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Discussing Comedy—an Interrogative Approach  \nRichard F . Hardin  \nUniversity of Kansas  \nDuring the last ten years before I retired in 2009, I often taught a course in narrative and dramatic comedy. I justified my affection for comedy by lamenting the usually heavy stuff in undergraduate English fare—tragedy and the literature of victimage. I admit I may well be a trivial person. Anita Loos’s Gentlemen Prefer Blondes appeared the same year as The Great Gatsby; Mary Chase’s Harvey had its premier the same year as The Glass Menagerie. If only one text from each year could survive, I’m not sure how I would vote.  \nMy course was organized somewhat historically: students always read, beside Loos and Chase, a few Plautus plays, Twelfth Night, and The Importance of Being Earnest. I also assigned a changing assortment of texts (by, e.g., Aristophanes, Molière, Hrabal, Nabokov, Flann O’Brien, Thurber). We took account of contemporary plotted comedy with class reports on comedies that students themselves selected, usually from television and film, though there was the occasional book (Catch-22) . For these reports, incidentally, the most popular and soughtafter topic was Seinfeld. But beyond that, selections were surprisingly varied and I never had togo back to students for more choices beyond the three they initially submitted.  \nTheory of comedy in the class came in small doses, with glimpses of Bakhtin, Bergson, Frye, Susanne Langer, and James Wood. I also provided input with a handout,“Tools for analyzing comedy.” This began as a simple list of questions and later became a more discursive, though still largely interrogative, handout. That is the origin of the present writing (thanks to  \nKristin Bovaird-Abo and Theresa Buchheister for help with the early handout) . Rather than posea single theory of comedy here, I assemble the kinds of questions one can raise whether in class or just in thinking about comedies. This can be considered a tool or heuristic for those who take comedy seriously and want to go beyond “why is this funny?” in the work of analysis. Needless to say, every viewpoint quoted in what follows can become a question for discussion.  \nWhen leading a class discussion of a tragedy, teachers often find it useful to fall back on criteria or “rules” offered in Aristotle’s Poetics (hubris,“tragic flaw,” reversal or peripety, fall from greatness, etc.). Aristotle’s book on comedy does not survive (see Eco’s Name of the Rose for speculation as to its fate), but other smart people since have come up with good and applicable theories and valid questions. It seems useful to consider undertaking the formal analysis of this genre especially if, as James Wood has claimed, the very heart of modernity has been characterized by an interest in “irresponsible” comedy (Wood 16-18) .  \nQuestions that comedy shares with other genres:  \n1. Historical, Biographical, and Literary Historical Données  \nThe usual historical, biographical, and literary historical données and what can be inferred from them. Questions arise about the times, reception history, sources, authorial obsessions, and textual interrelations. In this category, a special problem for comedy might concern the historical determinants of humor: a comic moment can depend on class differences no longer understood, or on differences no longer seen as laughable. Sir Philip Sidney says in An Apology for Poetry that “we” laugh at cripples. A more civilized era finds Henry Fielding, in the preface to Joseph Andrews, declaring that it uncivilized to laugh at the unfortunate. Ugliness or lameness, he says, is no laughing matter, unless the ugly person would pretend to be beautiful or the lame person to be agile. Then there are matters of social class no longer evident. In Plautus’s Asinaria (memorably staged in  \n2011 by the University of Missouri, Kansas City) two household slaves tell the master’s son that if he wants his girl he has to go through a humiliating scene, carrying one of ","cbCaifBEBpl5Rthd","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifBEBpl5Rthd","pdf",380857,16,"English","# Historical, Biographical, and Literary Historical Données\n## Historical determinants of humor\n## Social class, reception history, and sources\n# Plot\n## Order, disorder, and harmony\n## Intrigue, scheming, tricksters, and fools\n## Fortune vs. fate and resolution methods","[{\"question\":\"What is the main analytical goal of the interrogative approach to comedy?\",\"answer\":\"To provide a set of questions that helps readers take comedy seriously and move beyond asking only “why is this funny.”\"},{\"question\":\"How does the text handle historical context when analyzing comedic humor?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that humor often depends on historical and social differences that may no longer be understood, affecting reception, character dynamics, and what audiences consider laughable.\"},{\"question\":\"What plot-related questions does the text propose for comedy?\",\"answer\":\"It considers how events are ordered, how intrigue and scheming interact with fortune, and how comedies manage resolution—often through transformation near the end rather than in an orderly novel-like way.\"}]","Discussing Comedy - an Interrogative Approach | PDF",1792087157,25]