[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31773":3,"doc-seo-31773":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31773,8796095461610,"Oliver","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",8,"Research & Report","Digital Competence of In-Service Teachers in K-12 Education: A Systematic Literature Review","This study synthesizes empirical research on the digital competencies of K-12 in-service teachers, focusing on how digital competence is defined and on the included studies’ purposes, methods, outcomes, and limitations across 33 papers. The review uses the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to evaluate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies with attention to methodological rigour. The work addresses inconsistencies and gaps in prior literature by proposing an inductive, context-sensitive view of digital competence tailored to differences in resources, geography, and subject demands.","cbCaiqqtDXRdg8uu","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqqtDXRdg8uu","pdf",1095690,1,39,"English","en","# Abstract\n# Keywords\n# Context and Implications\n# Introduction\n## Role of ICT in Education","[{\"question\":\"What is the main aim of this systematic literature review?\",\"answer\":\"It systematically assess published studies on K-12 in-service teachers’ digital competence by examining definitions, research purposes, methodologies, outcomes, and limitations across the included studies.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the review evaluate the quality of the included research?\",\"answer\":\"It uses the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to evaluate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies for methodological rigour and balance.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the review emphasize a context-sensitive definition of digital competence?\",\"answer\":\"Because prior research often relies on generalized definitions that overlook variations across educational environments, such as geographical locations, available resources, and subject-specific demands.\"}]",1780088555,98,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"digital-competence-of-in-service-teachers-in-k-12-education-a-systematic-literature-review","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/digital-competence-of-in-service-teachers-in-k-12-education-a-systematic-literature-review/31773/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-29",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What is the main aim of this systematic literature review?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"It systematically assess published studies on K-12 in-service teachers’ digital competence by examining definitions, research purposes, methodologies, outcomes, and limitations across the included studies.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How does the review evaluate the quality of the included research?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It uses the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to evaluate qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies for methodological rigour and balance.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Why does the review emphasize a context-sensitive definition of digital competence?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"Because prior research often relies on generalized definitions that overlook variations across educational environments, such as geographical locations, available resources, and subject-specific demands.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]