[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-633389-105":59,"doc-detail-633389-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","different-types-of-love-love-attitudes","Different Types of Love - LOVE ATTITUDES","","LOVE ATTITUDES SCALE is a 42-item, 5-point questionnaire designed to assess attitudes toward love. It measures how respondents view both their current/recent/hypothetical partner and love in general, and organizes results into six 7-item subscales: EROS, LUDUS, STORGE, PRAGMA, MANIA, and AGAPE. Instructions guide answers using the respondent’s current or most recent partner, or predicted responses if never in love. The document also summarizes related research on compassionate love and attachment-linked romantic love.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/different-types-of-love-love-attitudes/633389/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/different-types-of-love-love-attitudes/633389.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Kurz","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-22",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does the LOVE ATTITUDES SCALE measure?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It measures attitudes toward love using a 42-item questionnaire. It assesses attitudes toward one’s partner and toward love in general, summarized across six love-style subscales.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How many subscales are included and what are they?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The scale is broken into 6 subscales with 7 items each: EROS, LUDUS, STORGE, PRAGMA, MANIA, and AGAPE.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How should respondents answer the questionnaire?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Respondents are instructed to answer with their current partner in mind. If they have no current partner, they should use their most recent partner; if never in love, they should answer in terms of what would likely be true.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},633389,1793137480,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":29,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},2336478945635,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","LOVE ATTITUDES SCALE  \nReference:  \nHendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. (1986) . A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.  \nDescription of Measure:  \nA 42-item questionnaire designed to measure attitudes toward love. The questionnaire combines attitudes toward one’s current/recent/hypothetical** partner with attitudes about love in general. The scale is broken into 6 subscales (7 items each) that each represent a different love style:  \nEROS (passionate love)  \nLUDUS (game-playing love)  \nSTORGE (friendship love)  \nPRAGMA (practical love)  \nMANIA (possessive, dependent love)  \nAGAPE (altruistic love) .  \nParticipants respond to each item using a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (strongly agree), 2 (moderately agree), 3 (neutral), 4 (moderately disagree), 5 (strongly disagree) .  \n**Participants are instructed to answer questions with their current partner in mind. However, the instructions state that if the respondent does not currently have a partner, he or she should answer with their most recent partner in mind. If, however, the respondents have never been in love, the instructions state that they should provide whatever answer they believe would be true.  \nAbstracts of Selected Related Articles:  \nSprecher, S. & Fehr, B. (2005) . Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629-651.  \nA compassionate love scale was developed that can be used, in alternative forms, to assess compassionate or altruistic love for different targets (e.g., close others and all of humankind) . Using three samples (total N = 529), the Compassionate Love scale was developed and piloted. Three studies (total N = 700) were then conducted to provide validation of the scale and to examine correlates of compassionate love. In support of our predictions, compassionate love was found to be associated positively with prosocial behavior, as directed both to close others and to all of humanity. Those who were more religious or spiritual experienced more compassionate love than those who were less religious or spiritual.  \nEvidence was found that compassionate love is distinct from empathy. In the final study, we introduced a relationship-specific version of the Compassionate Love scale, and found that compassionate love for a specific close other was associated with the provision of social support for that person.  \nFeeney, J. A. & Noller, P. (1990) . Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships.  \nJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281-291.  \nQuestionnaire measures of attachment style, attachment history, beliefs about relationships, self-esteem, limerence, loving, love addiction, and love styles were administered to 374 undergraduates. Attachment style was related in theoretically expected ways to attachment history and to beliefs about relationships. Securely attached Ss reported relatively positive  \nSelf Report Measures for Love and Compassion Research: Different Types of Love  \nperceptions of their early family relationships. Avoidant Ss were most likely to report childhood separation from their mother and to express mistrust of others. Anxiousambivalent subjects were less likely than avoidant Ss to see their father as supportive, and they reported a lack of independence and a desire for deep commitment in relationships. The self-esteem measure and each of the scales measuring forms of love were factor analyzed separately. Analyses based on scale scores derived from the resulting factors indicated that attachment style was also strongly related to self-esteem and to the various forms of love discussed in other theoretical frameworks. The results suggest that attachment theory offers a useful perspective on adult love relationships  \nHazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987) . Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.  \nThis article explores the possibility that romantic","cbCaim5oUMSm5xwE","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaim5oUMSm5xwE","pdf",79444,"English","# LOVE ATTITUDES SCALE\n## Description of Measure\n## Instructions\n## Selected Related Articles\n## Scale Items","[{\"question\":\"What does the LOVE ATTITUDES SCALE measure?\",\"answer\":\"It measures attitudes toward love using a 42-item questionnaire. It assesses attitudes toward one’s partner and toward love in general, summarized across six love-style subscales.\"},{\"question\":\"How many subscales are included and what are they?\",\"answer\":\"The scale is broken into 6 subscales with 7 items each: EROS, LUDUS, STORGE, PRAGMA, MANIA, and AGAPE.\"},{\"question\":\"How should respondents answer the questionnaire?\",\"answer\":\"Respondents are instructed to answer with their current partner in mind. If they have no current partner, they should use their most recent partner; if never in love, they should answer in terms of what would likely be true.\"}]","Different Types of Love - LOVE ATTITUDES | PDF",1792672081,15]