[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-detail-140262-en":59,"doc-seo-140262-105":80},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":60},{"doc_id":61,"user_id":62,"nickname":63,"user_avatar":64,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":66,"doc_content":67,"file_id":68,"file_url":69,"file_type":70,"file_size":71,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":52,"language":72,"language_code":73,"site_id":74,"html_lang":73,"table_of_contents":75,"faqs":76,"seo_title":77,"seo_description":66,"update_tm":78,"read_time":79},140262,8796095461610,"Oliver","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Developmental Changes in Drawing Production Under Different Memory Demands in a U.S. and Chinese Sample - Research findings","Examines how children’s drawing recognizability evolves from ages 4 to 9 when task demands on memory differ, using digital shape tracings and drawings of common object categories. Compares drawing from verbal versus picture cues and evaluates shape-tracing ability across two sites: San Jose (United States) and Beijing (China). Developmental trajectories are highly similar across cue types and locations, while the Beijing sample produces more recognizable drawings. Results suggest changes reflect evolving internal object-category representations rather than limits from visuomotor control or working memory.","This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers . This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.  \nDevelopmental Psychology  \n© 2023 American Psychological Association ISSN: 0012-1649  \n2023, Vol. 59, No. 10, 1784–1793 [https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001600](https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001600)  \nDevelopmental Changes in Drawing Production Under Different Memory Demands in a U.S. and Chinese Sample  \nBria Long 1, Ying Wang2, Stella Christie2, Michael C. Frank 1, and Judith E. Fan 1, 3  \n1 Department of Psychology, Stanford University  \n2 Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University  \n3 Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego  \nChildren’s drawings of common object categories become dramatically more recognizable across childhood.  \nWhat are the major factors that drive developmental changes in children’s drawings? To what degree are children’s drawings a product of their changing internal category representations versus limited by their visuomotor abilities or their ability to recall the relevant visual information? To explore these questions, we examined the degree to which developmental changes in drawing recognizability vary across different drawing tasks that vary in memory demands (i.e., drawing from verbal vs. picture cues) and with children’s shape-tracing abilities across two geographical locations (San Jose, United States, and Beijing, China) . We collected digital shape tracings and drawings of common object categories (e.g., cat, airplane) from 4-to 9-year-olds (N = 253) . The developmental trajectory of drawing recognizability was remarkably similar when children were asked to draw from pictures versus verbal cues and across these two geographical locations. In addition, our Beijing sample produced more recognizable drawings but showed similar tracing abilities to children from San Jose. Overall, this work suggests that the developmental trajectory of children’s drawings is remarkably consistent and not easily explainable by changes in visuomotor control or working memory; instead, changes in children’s drawings over development may at least partly reflect changes in the internal representations of object categories.  \nPublic Significance Statement  \nThe present study examined developmental changes in children’s drawings of common object categories from 4 to 9 years of age. The findings suggest relative consistency in the developmental trajectory of drawing recognizability across two different sites (San Jose, United States, and Beijing, China) and two different drawing tasks (verbal vs. picture cues). The digital drawings and stroke-by-stroke records are made available as a resource for future work.  \nKeywords: children’s drawings, visual production, tracing, object recognition, visuomotor control  \nAs humans, we have many powerful tools to externalize what we perceive and know, including language and gesture. One tool that has been especially transformative for human cognition and culture is a graphical representation, which allows people to encode their thoughts in a visible, durable format. Drawing is an important case study in graphical representation, being a technique that dates back 60,000 years (Hoffmann et al., 2018), well before the emergence of symbolic writing systems, and is practiced in many cultures.  \nIn modern times, drawings are produced prolifically by children from an early age and change dramatically and systematically across childhood (Karmiloff-Smith, 1990; Kellogg, 1969): younger children (4–5 years of age) tend to include fewer cues in their drawings to differentiate between categories (e.g., [child vs. man](child vs. man)) than older children (6–7 years of age), who enrich their drawings with more diagnostic part (Sitton & Light, 1992) and relational (Light & Simmons, 1983) information. What are the factors driving these dramatic changes in  \nBria Long  ","cbCaivDxhYAXIhsw","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivDxhYAXIhsw","pdf",2427376,"English","en",105,"# Public Significance Statement\n## Study scope and tasks\n## Key findings and implications","[{\"question\":\"本研究关注儿童绘画发展的哪些方面？\",\"answer\":\"研究关注4到9岁儿童在不同记忆需求任务下，常见物体类别绘画的可辨识度如何随发展变化。\"},{\"question\":\"研究如何区分不同的记忆需求？\",\"answer\":\"通过让儿童分别在“图片线索”和“文字线索”条件下作画，比较两种任务带来的绘画可辨识度差异。\"},{\"question\":\"研究结论更支持哪些解释？\",\"answer\":\"结果表明儿童绘画发展的轨迹在不同地点与线索条件下高度一致，难以用视动控制或工作记忆的限制来解释；更可能反映物体类别内部表征的变化。\"}]","Developmental Changes in Drawing Production Under Different Memory Demands in a U.S. and Chinese Sample - Research findings | PDF",1787572486,25,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"ok",{"site_id":74,"language":73,"slug":83,"title":65,"keywords":84,"description":66,"schema_data":85,"social_meta":139,"head_meta":141,"extra_data":143,"updated_unix":78},"developmental-changes-in-drawing-production-under-different-memory-demands-in-a-us-and-chinese-sample-research-findings","",{"@graph":86,"@context":138},[87,101,121],{"@type":88,"itemListElement":89},"BreadcrumbList",[90,94,96,99],{"item":91,"name":92,"@type":93,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":95,"name":9,"@type":93,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":97,"name":40,"@type":93,"position":98},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":100,"name":65,"@type":93,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/developmental-changes-in-drawing-production-under-different-memory-demands-in-a-us-and-chinese-sample-research-findings/140262/",{"url":100,"name":65,"@type":102,"image":103,"author":108,"headline":65,"publisher":110,"fileFormat":113,"inLanguage":73,"description":66,"dateModified":114,"datePublished":115,"encodingFormat":113,"isAccessibleForFree":116,"interactionStatistic":117},"DigitalDocument",{"url":104,"@type":105,"width":106,"height":107},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/developmental-changes-in-drawing-production-under-different-memory-demands-in-a-us-and-chinese-sample-research-findings/140262.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":63,"@type":109},"Person",{"url":91,"name":111,"@type":112},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-11","2026-08-24",true,{"@type":118,"interactionType":119,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":120},"ViewAction",{"@type":122,"mainEntity":123},"FAQPage",[124,130,134],{"name":125,"@type":126,"acceptedAnswer":127},"本研究关注儿童绘画发展的哪些方面？","Question",{"text":128,"@type":129},"研究关注4到9岁儿童在不同记忆需求任务下，常见物体类别绘画的可辨识度如何随发展变化。","Answer",{"name":131,"@type":126,"acceptedAnswer":132},"研究如何区分不同的记忆需求？",{"text":133,"@type":129},"通过让儿童分别在“图片线索”和“文字线索”条件下作画，比较两种任务带来的绘画可辨识度差异。",{"name":135,"@type":126,"acceptedAnswer":136},"研究结论更支持哪些解释？",{"text":137,"@type":129},"结果表明儿童绘画发展的轨迹在不同地点与线索条件下高度一致，难以用视动控制或工作记忆的限制来解释；更可能反映物体类别内部表征的变化。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":100,"og:type":140,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":111,"og:description":66},"article",{"robots":142,"canonical":100},"index,follow",{"doc_id":61,"site_id":74}]