[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-598517-105":59,"doc-detail-598517-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","developing-deep-understanding-and-literacy-while-addressing-a-gender-based-literacy-gap-abstract","Developing Deep Understanding and Literacy while Addressing a Gender-Based Literacy Gap - Abstract","","Online discourse from a class of 22 students (11 boys and 11 girls) was analyzed to measure growth in conceptual understanding and literacy over a two-year period in Grades 3–4. Students contributed notes to an online Knowledge Building environment, Knowledge Forum®. Their work showed both boys and girls produced substantial text and graphics, using an increasing share of less-frequent, advanced vocabulary, including academic and domain-specific terms beyond their grade level. Classroom discourse summaries indicate deep understanding and vocabulary growth mutually reinforce each other in online and offline exchanges; observed gender differences suggest Knowledge Building may help boys overcome literacy weaknesses.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/developing-deep-understanding-and-literacy-while-addressing-a-gender-based-literacy-gap-abstract/598517/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/developing-deep-understanding-and-literacy-while-addressing-a-gender-based-literacy-gap-abstract/598517.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"A glass of water","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How was conceptual understanding and literacy growth assessed in the study?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The study analyzed online discourse from 22 students, focusing on advances in conceptual understanding and literacy across a two-year period in Grades 3–4.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What learning environment did the students use to contribute their notes?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Students contributed notes to an online Knowledge Building environment called Knowledge Forum®.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What did the contributions reveal about vocabulary development?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Both boys and girls produced substantial text and graphics, and their writing increasingly used less-frequent advanced words, including academic vocabulary and domain-specific terms from higher grade levels.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},598517,1792171966,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":46,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":31},962090760832,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Developing Deep Understanding and Literacy while Addressing a Gender-Based Literacy Gap  \nAméliorer la compréhension et la littératie tout en tenant compte des disparités entre les sexes  \nYanqing Sun, Jianwei Zhang and, Marlene Scardamalia  \nAuthors  \nYanqing Sun, visiting assistant professor at the Albany Institute for Research in  \nEducation. Correspondence regarding this article can be sent to [ysun@albany.edu](ysun@albany.edu)[ ](ysun@albany.edu)Jianwei Zhang, assistant professor in the School of Education, the State University of New York at Albany.  \nMarlene Scardamalia, Presidents' Chair of Education and Knowledge Technologies and Director of the Institute for Knowledge Innovation and Technology (IKIT), OISE. University of Toronto  \nAbstract  \nOnline discourse from a class of 22 students (11 boys and 11 girls) was analysed to assess advances in conceptual understanding and literacy. The students worked over a two-­‐year period (Grades 3-­‐4), during which they contributed notes to an online Knowledge Building environment—Knowledge Forum® .  \nContributions revealed that both boys and girls produced a substantial amount of text and graphics, and that their written texts incorporated an increasing proportion of less-­‐frequent, advanced words, including academic vocabulary and domain-­‐specific words from grade levels higher than their own. Brief accounts of classroom discourse indicate how deep understanding and vocabulary growth mutually support each other in online and offline exchanges. The gender differences that were observed show boys doing slightly better than girls, suggesting that Knowledge Building has the potential to help boys overcome weaknesses in literacy.  \nRésumé  \nLa conversation en ligne d’une classe de 22 élèves (11 garçons et 11 filles) a été analysée pour évaluer les progrès en matière de compréhension conceptuelle et de littératie. Les élèves travaillaient sur une période de deux ans (troisième et quatrième années) pendant laquelle ils ont contribué par écrit à unenvironnement en ligne de coélaboration de connaissances – Knowledge Forum. Leurs contributions ont révélé que tant les garçons que les filles ont produit bonnombre de textes et d’illustrations, et que leurs textes comportaient une proportion de plus en plus élevée de mots peu courants et plus complexes,  \nincluant du vocabulaire théorique et des mots liés à des domaines dépassant leur niveau d’étude. Des résumés de la discussion en classe indiquent comment une connaissance approfondie et l’enrichissement du vocabulaire se soutiennent mutuellement dans les échanges en ligne et en classe. Les différences observées entre les sexes ont montré que les garçons réussissaient légèrement mieux que les filles, ce qui suggère que la coélaboration de connaissances a le potentield’aider les garçons à surmonter leurs faiblesses en matière de littératie.  \nIntroduction  \nWith the advent of the “Knowledge Age” in which social wealth is based upon the capability to create, advance, integrate, and use knowledge, there is need for a  \nmulti-­‐literate society able to generate new knowledge, and education to engage all citizens in the process of knowledge creation. Almost half of Ontario Grade 3 students fail to meet Ministry standards in reading and writing (Ontario Public School Boards’Association, 2004). And worldwide, boys tend to lag behind girls in conventional literacy (Mullis, Martin, Gonzalez, & Kennedy, 2003; OECD & UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2003; Ontario Public School Boards’ Association, 2004) . How to raise the level of literacy among all students and boys in particular represents an important challenge. The purpose of the present study was to explore whether a Knowledge Building approach (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2006) might help with the parallel challenges of deep understanding in core subject areas while helping to develop literacy among both boys and girls and addressing the literacy gap between them.  \nDeveloping Student Literacy in ","cbCaiagVQHs4VWlT","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiagVQHs4VWlT","pdf",658960,"English","# Abstract\n## Study design and context\n## Vocabulary and conceptual growth findings\n## Gender differences and implications\n# Introduction\n## Literacy challenges\n## Purpose of the study\n# Developing Student Literacy in a Knowledge Building Environment\n## Technology and dialogic literacy research","[{\"question\":\"How was conceptual understanding and literacy growth assessed in the study?\",\"answer\":\"The study analyzed online discourse from 22 students, focusing on advances in conceptual understanding and literacy across a two-year period in Grades 3–4.\"},{\"question\":\"What learning environment did the students use to contribute their notes?\",\"answer\":\"Students contributed notes to an online Knowledge Building environment called Knowledge Forum®.\"},{\"question\":\"What did the contributions reveal about vocabulary development?\",\"answer\":\"Both boys and girls produced substantial text and graphics, and their writing increasingly used less-frequent advanced words, including academic vocabulary and domain-specific terms from higher grade levels.\"}]","Developing Deep Understanding and Literacy while Addressing a Gender-Based Literacy Gap - Abstract | PDF",1792087078]