[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-445700-105":59,"doc-detail-445700-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","developing-a-health-technology-assessment-glossary-a-design-thinking-approach-to-enhance-health-technology-assessment-judiciary-communication","Developing A Health Technology Assessment Glossary - A Design Thinking Approach To Enhance Health Technology Assessment - Judiciary Communication","","Brazil’s health-related litigation underscores the need for clear, effective communication between health technology assessment (HTA) and legal professionals. The Hospital Sírio-Libanês Center of HTA (NATS-HSL) works with Brazil’s National Council of Justice to build capacity for judges and legal staff. Using a Design Thinking process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test), the project develops an HTA glossary tailored to judiciary needs, informed by a survey and iterative revisions before implementation.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/developing-a-health-technology-assessment-glossary-a-design-thinking-approach-to-enhance-health-technology-assessment-judiciary-communication/445700/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/developing-a-health-technology-assessment-glossary-a-design-thinking-approach-to-enhance-health-technology-assessment-judiciary-communication/445700.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Levi","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem does the glossary development address?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It addresses the communication gap between HTA and legal professionals in Brazil, helping judges and legal staff interpret HTA findings more effectively.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How was the glossary developed?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The project used a Design Thinking approach with five stages: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What did the survey reveal about preferred glossary formats and content?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Most respondents favored an alphabetical format and preferred online PDF and website delivery. They also valued brevity, examples, “learn more” links, informal language, and comprehensive terminology.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},445700,1790834103,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":81,"preview_page_count":4},7971461740909,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","PP06 Exploring Domains And Approaches In Medical Device Technology Evaluation: A Systematic Review  \nLeidy Anne Teixeira ([leidyunb@gmail.com](leidyunb@gmail.com)), Fotini Toscas, Daiana Blas and Vania Cristina Canuto Santos  \nIntroduction: Medical device technology evaluation has advanced significantly in recent years. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the main domains used globally for the evaluation ofthese technologies and considering the perspective of technology adoption in healthcare systems.  \nMethods: Structured searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, the Virtual Health Library, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases using the terms “medical technology”OR “medical device” OR “equipment and supplies” AND “health technology assessment” OR “biomedical technology assessments” for studies published between January 2017 and May 2023, excluding those on specific technologies or audiences. Documents from the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and databases from the World Health Organization were also included. Study selection, extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The term “domain” in this systematic review was inspired by the EUnetHTA Core Model.  \nResults: A total of 5,790 studies were retrieved, with 41 meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings were grouped into eight domains, with percentages based on the selected articles (n=41; 100%): (i) safety (n=17; 41%); (ii) efficacy (n=18; 44%); (iii) health problem, current use of technology, and innovation (n=17; 41%); (iv) legal aspects (n=28; 68%); (iv) organizational benefits (n=17; 41%);(vi) description and technical characteristics of the technology (n=30; 73%); (vii) costs and economic evaluation (n=24; 58%); and (viii) social participation (n=11; 27%) . Most articles (80%) were of European origin.  \nConclusions: Due to the diversity of medical devices, a single methodological guideline may not cover all their specificities. Studies suggested grouping by technological characteristics to standardize the process. We highlight the importance of exploring less discussed domains, such as social participation and organizational benefits, which represent future topics.  \nPP07 Developing A Health  \nTechnology Assessment Glossary: A Design Thinking Approach To Enhance Health Technology Assessment – Judiciary Communication  \nCecilia Menezes Farinasso ([ceciliafarinasso@gmail.com](ceciliafarinasso@gmail.com)), Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Camila Monteiro Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca, Isabela Porto de Toledo, Patrícia do Carmo Silva Parreira, Roberta Borges Silva, Verônica Colpani and Rachel Riera  \nIntroduction: Brazil’s health-related litigation has highlighted the need for effective communication between health technology assessment (HTA) and legal professionals. The Hospital Sírio-Libanês Center of HTA (NATS-HSL) in Brazil collaborates with the National Council of Justice to provide capacity building initiatives. This study aimed to present the development of an HTA glossary tailored to judges and legal staff.  \nMethods: The project followed a Design Thinking methodology with five stages: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. Initially, NATS-HSL conducted an electronic survey of a sample of Brazilian judges to identify preferred terminology and glossary format (empathize stage). During the define and ideate stages, challengesand gaps in interpreting scientific findings were analyzed. The prototype glossary will be produced in print, digital, and PDF formats. These versions will be distributed to legal professionals for review, and their feedback will guide subsequent revisions before implementation. Sources of Support: Program to Support the Institutional Development of the Unified Health System (PROADI-SUS), Ministry of Health, NUP: 25000 . 175715/2023-41 .  \nResults: The survey","cbCaisfY7U7gbjNf","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaisfY7U7gbjNf","pdf",34298,"English","# Introduction\n# Methods\n# Results\n# Conclusions","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the glossary development address?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses the communication gap between HTA and legal professionals in Brazil, helping judges and legal staff interpret HTA findings more effectively.\"},{\"question\":\"How was the glossary developed?\",\"answer\":\"The project used a Design Thinking approach with five stages: empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test.\"},{\"question\":\"What did the survey reveal about preferred glossary formats and content?\",\"answer\":\"Most respondents favored an alphabetical format and preferred online PDF and website delivery. They also valued brevity, examples, “learn more” links, informal language, and comprehensive terminology.\"}]","Developing A Health Technology Assessment Glossary - A Design Thinking Approach To Enhance Health Technology Assessment - Judiciary Communication | PDF",1790712580]