[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-649425-105":59,"doc-detail-649425-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","design-of-a-pedestrian-bridge-crossing-over-coliseum-boulevard-abstract-group-project-report","DESIGN OF A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING OVER COLISEUM BOULEVARD - Abstract - Group Project Report","","Pedestrian bridge design for crossing over Coliseum Boulevard, developed as a civil engineering group project within Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne. The document defines the problem, background, requirements, specifications, given parameters, design variables, aesthetic and material considerations, and key limitations such as cost, natural conditions, and construction issues. Multiple conceptual bridge types (cable-stayed, truss, suspension, and arch) are evaluated using advantages, disadvantages, and a decision matrix, leading to a selected design and subsequent detailed arch modeling with evaluation support via SAP2000.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/design-of-a-pedestrian-bridge-crossing-over-coliseum-boulevard-abstract-group-project-report/649425/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/design-of-a-pedestrian-bridge-crossing-over-coliseum-boulevard-abstract-group-project-report/649425.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-25","2026-10-23",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":14},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What bridge concepts are compared in the evaluation?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The report compares a cable-stayed bridge, truss bridge, suspension bridge, and arch bridge. Each concept is reviewed with listed advantages and disadvantages.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What categories of design inputs does Section I define?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Section I covers the problem statement and background, then specifies requirements, specifications, given parameters, and design variables. It also outlines limitations and constraints such as cost, natural conditions, and construction issues.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How is the final design decision supported?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The report uses a decision matrix to summarize evaluations of the different conceptual designs. It then presents the selected design and the detailed design work that follows.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},649425,1792920345,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":14,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","“DESIGN OF A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING OVER COLISEUM BOULEVARD”  \nGroup Members: Renan Constantino  \nChris Ripke  \nJames Welch  \nFaculty Advisor: Mohammad Alhassan, Ph. D.  \nCivil Engineering Program-Department of Engineering Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne  \nDecember 11 , 2009  \nTable of Contents  \nList of Tables ..................................................................................................................... iv  \nList of Figures ..................................................................................................................... v  \nAcknowledgments ............................................................................................................ vii  \nAbstract ............................................................................................................................ viii  \n1. Section I: Problem Statement.................................................................................. 1  \n1.1. Problem Statement............................................................................................ 1  \n1.2. Background....................................................................................................... 2  \n1.2.1. Crossroads Partnership .............................................................................. 2  \n1.2.2. Rivergreenway Trail.................................................................................. 2  \n1.3. Requirements, Specifications, and Given Parameters ...................................... 5  \n1.4. Design Variables............................................................................................... 5  \n1.4.1. Aesthetic Considerations (Bridge Type) ................................................... 5  \n1.4.2. Construction Materials .............................................................................. 6  \n1.4.3. Coliseum Expansion.................................................................................. 6  \n1.4.4. Connect to Ivy Tech .................................................................................. 6  \n1.4.5. Covered or Open ....................................................................................... 6  \n1.5. Limitations and Constraints .............................................................................. 6  \n1.5.1. Cost............................................................................................................ 6  \n1.5.2. Natural Conditions .................................................................................... 7  \n1.5.3. Construction Issues ................................................................................... 7  \n1.5.4. Additional Considerations......................................................................... 7  \n1.6. SAP2000 ........................................................................................................... 7  \n2. Section II: Conceptual Design .............................................................................. 12  \n2.1. Location of Bridge .......................................................................................... 12  \n2.2. Concept I: Cable-Stayed Bridge ..................................................................... 14  \n2.3. Concept II: Truss Bridge ................................................................................ 14  \n2.4. Concept III: Suspension Bridge...................................................................... 15  \n2.5. Concept IV: Arch Bridge................................................................................ 16  \n3. Section III: Summary of the Evaluation of Different Conceptual Designs .......... 16  \n3.1. Concept I: Cable-Stayed Bridge ..................................................................... 16  \n3.1.1. Advantages .............................................................................................. 16  \n3.1.2. Disadvantages.......................................","cbCairhVULhucn5f","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairhVULhucn5f","pdf",3242094,106,"English","# Section I: Problem Statement\n## Problem Statement\n## Background\n## Requirements, Specifications, and Given Parameters\n## Design Variables\n## Limitations and Constraints\n## SAP2000\n# Section II: Conceptual Design\n## Location of Bridge\n## Concept I: Cable-Stayed Bridge\n## Concept II: Truss Bridge\n## Concept III: Suspension Bridge\n## Concept IV: Arch Bridge\n# Section III: Summary of the Evaluation of Different Conceptual Designs\n## Advantages and Disadvantages by Concept\n## Decision Matrix\n## Selected Design\n# Section IV: Detailed Design of the Selected Conceptual Design\n## Arch without Angled Members\n## Modeling of Bridge","[{\"question\":\"What bridge concepts are compared in the evaluation?\",\"answer\":\"The report compares a cable-stayed bridge, truss bridge, suspension bridge, and arch bridge. Each concept is reviewed with listed advantages and disadvantages.\"},{\"question\":\"What categories of design inputs does Section I define?\",\"answer\":\"Section I covers the problem statement and background, then specifies requirements, specifications, given parameters, and design variables. It also outlines limitations and constraints such as cost, natural conditions, and construction issues.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the final design decision supported?\",\"answer\":\"The report uses a decision matrix to summarize evaluations of the different conceptual designs. It then presents the selected design and the detailed design work that follows.\"}]","DESIGN OF A PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING OVER COLISEUM BOULEVARD - Abstract - Group Project Report | PDF",1792799754,267]