[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-230581-105":59,"doc-detail-230581-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","decision-support-system-model-for-pppk-teacher-selection-using-the-ahp-method","Decision Support System Model for PPPK Teacher Selection Using the - AHP Method","","This study develops a decision support system for PPPK teacher selection using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to improve objectivity, transparency, and accountability at SMP Negeri 1 Ukui. The research applies a descriptive quantitative design using observation, interviews, and paired-comparison questionnaires to principals, senior teachers, administrative staff, and school supervisors. Results indicate the Administration criterion has the highest weight, followed by Suitability Selection and Interviews, with sensitivity analysis confirming stable candidate rankings.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/decision-support-system-model-for-pppk-teacher-selection-using-the-ahp-method/230581/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/decision-support-system-model-for-pppk-teacher-selection-using-the-ahp-method/230581.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Mason","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-25","2026-09-10",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What problem does the AHP-based decision support system address in PPPK recruitment?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It addresses subjectivity and potential bias in school-level teacher selection by providing a structured, quantifiable evaluation framework.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Which criteria received the highest weight in the AHP analysis?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The Administration criterion received the highest weight, followed by Suitability Selection and Interviews.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"How were the results validated regarding ranking stability?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Sensitivity analysis was used, showing candidate ranking results remained relatively stable even when criterion weights changed.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},230581,1789051899,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":41,"preview_page_count":4},5909887256941,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","| \u003Cbr>P-ISSN: 2987-7261\u003Cbr>E-ISSN: 2987-7253 | JURITJurnal Riset Ilmu Teknik\u003Cbr>Journal homepage: [https://jurnaljepip.com/index.php/jurit](https://jurnaljepip.com/index.php/jurit)\u003Cbr>Vol 2, No. 2, pp;88-99, 2024\u003Cbr>[DOI: doi.org/10.59976/jurit.v1i1.106](DOI: doi.org/10.59976/jurit.v1i1.106) | |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n\nDecision Support System Model for PPPK Teacher Selection Using the  \nAHP Method  \n1Adinda Fadilah Hamdi, 2Refliana  \nPostgraduate Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia  \nKampus Limau Manis, Kecamatan Pauh, Kota Padang, Provinsi Sumatera Barat  \nEmail: dindafadilah2001@gmail.Com  \nSubmitted:07/28/2024; Reviewed: 08/02/2024; Accepted: 09/23/2024  \nABSTRACT  \nThis study to develop a decision support system based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the recruitment process of Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK) at SMP Negeri 1 Ukui. The background of this study is the need for a more objective, transparent, and accountable selection mechanism to reduce subjectivity in determining the passing grade for honorary teachers. The research method used a descriptive quantitative approach with data collection through observation, interviews, and paired comparison questionnaires administered to the principal, senior teachers, administrative staff, and school supervisors. The results of the analysis show that the Administration criterion received the highest weight (0.343), followed by Suitability Selection (0.535) and Interviews (0.122) . In the subcriteria, the aspect of administrative document filing was the dominant factor (48%), while in suitability selection, teacher performance ranked highest (39%). Sensitivity analysis proved that the ranking results of teacher candidates were relatively stable even though the criteria weights changed. These findings confirm that AHP can minimize the subjectivity of selection and provide a quantitative basis for determining candidate priorities. This study has implications for improving the accountability of PPPK recruitment policies at the school level while opening up opportunities for the integration of hybrid methods such as AHP–TOPSIS in future research.  \nKeywords: AHP, PPPK, Decision Support System, Teacher Selection, Education Recruitment  \n ` This is an open-access article under the CC–BY license.  \nINTRODUCTION  \nTeachers play a crucial role in improving the quality of human resources and shaping future generations. In many developing countries, however, non-permanent or honorary teachers often face uncertain employment status and insufficient welfare benefits. To address this issue, the Indonesian government has introduced the Pegawai Pemerintah dengan Perjanjian Kerja (PPPK), or Government Employees with Work Agreements, as part of the civil service reform policy. This  \nprogram provides a fairer mechanism for recruiting qualified teachers while improving their professional welfare [1] .  \nSince 2021, the recruitment of teachers through the traditional Civil Servant Candidate (CPNS) scheme has been officially discontinued and replaced by PPPK appointments [2] . This policy shift aims to enhance teacher quality and at the same time offer career opportunities for experienced honorary teachers who were previously ineligible for CPNS due to age restrictions or administrative barriers. Nevertheless, the implementation of PPPK recruitment at the school level remains challenging. Teacher selection is usually conducted by school principals and senior teachers, which may introduce subjectivity and potential bias, such as favoritism towards certain [3][4] . Therefore, developing an objective decision support system is essential to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in the selection process.  \nSMP Negeri 1 Ukui is one of the schools involved in the 2022 PPPK recruitment process. A total of 14 honorary teachers from various subject areas applied for the available positions, with teaching experience ranging from 4 to 17 years. Most applicants speci","cbCaimJc6DWIkGdD","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimJc6DWIkGdD","pdf",396177,12,"English","# Abstract\n## Keywords\n# Introduction\n## Teacher role and PPPK policy context\n## Challenges in school-level selection\n## Case context: SMP Negeri 1 Ukui\n## Research urgency and decision framework\n## Related studies using AHP","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the AHP-based decision support system address in PPPK recruitment?\",\"answer\":\"It addresses subjectivity and potential bias in school-level teacher selection by providing a structured, quantifiable evaluation framework.\"},{\"question\":\"Which criteria received the highest weight in the AHP analysis?\",\"answer\":\"The Administration criterion received the highest weight, followed by Suitability Selection and Interviews.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the results validated regarding ranking stability?\",\"answer\":\"Sensitivity analysis was used, showing candidate ranking results remained relatively stable even when criterion weights changed.\"}]","Decision Support System Model for PPPK Teacher Selection Using the - AHP Method | PDF"]