[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33192":3,"doc-seo-33192":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33192,4398048949847,"Eliana","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002536579ef2da7f?_k=1778318612642679267",2,"Literature","Critique of Judgment","The document presents Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Judgment in Werner S. Pluhar’s translation, including the first introduction and framing materials. It outlines Kant’s critical project connecting the division of philosophy, the domain of philosophy, and judgment as an a priori legislating power. The structure covers the aesthetic judgment—analytic of the beautiful and the sublime—detailing the quality, quantity, relation, and modality of judgments of taste, and transitions toward teleological judgment and the completion of the critical system.","cbCainiZ1Ww4Ld7A","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainiZ1Ww4Ld7A","pdf",16949105,1,686,"English","en","# Introduction\n## Division of Philosophy\n## Judgment as Mediating Connection\n# Part I: Analytic of Aesthetic Judgment\n## Division I: Analytic of Aesthetic Judgment\n### Book I: Analytic of the Beautiful\n#### Moments of a Judgment of Taste\n## Book II: Analytic of the Sublime\n### Mathematically Sublime","[{\"question\":\"What is the focus of Kant’s Critique of Judgment in this work?\",\"answer\":\"It develops Kant’s account of how judgment connects the parts of philosophy through aesthetic judgment and later extends toward teleological judgment.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document organize the aesthetic analysis?\",\"answer\":\"It structures aesthetic judgment into an analytic of the beautiful and an analytic of the sublime, with judgments of taste analyzed by distinct “moments.”\"},{\"question\":\"What does the work mean by “judgment” as a power that legislates a priori?\",\"answer\":\"It treats judgment as grounded in transcendental principles that operate prior to experience, including principles of formal purposiveness in nature.\"}]",1782204370,1056,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":25},105,"critique-of-judgment","",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/critique-of-judgment/33192/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What is the focus of Kant’s Critique of Judgment in this work?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"It develops Kant’s account of how judgment connects the parts of philosophy through aesthetic judgment and later extends toward teleological judgment.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"How does the document organize the aesthetic analysis?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"It structures aesthetic judgment into an analytic of the beautiful and an analytic of the sublime, with judgments of taste analyzed by distinct “moments.”",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"What does the work mean by “judgment” as a power that legislates a priori?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"It treats judgment as grounded in transcendental principles that operate prior to experience, including principles of formal purposiveness in nature.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]