[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-592790-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-592790-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","critical-thinking-dispositions-of-social-studies-teacher-candidates","Critical Thinking Dispositions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates","","Critical Thinking Dispositions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates examines the critical thinking disposition levels of 250 prospective social studies teachers from a state university. Using a descriptive survey method, the study employs a Personal Information Form and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI-R), analyzed with IBM SPSS 21.0 via independent samples t-test and One Way ANOVA. Results indicate generally low critical thinking dispositions, with the highest scores in Analyticity and the lowest in Systematicity.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/","Exam",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/critical-thinking-dispositions-of-social-studies-teacher-candidates/592790/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/critical-thinking-dispositions-of-social-studies-teacher-candidates/592790.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Marglet","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the main aim of the study?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"To analyze the critical thinking disposition of social studies teacher candidates.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How was critical thinking disposition measured?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The study used the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI-R) together with a Personal Information Form.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What were the main findings about critical thinking disposition levels?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Social studies teacher candidates showed generally low critical thinking disposition, with the highest Analyticity scores and the lowest Systematicity scores.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},592790,1792927437,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,95,100,104,109,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":33,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":110,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":117,"preview_page_count":4},2336477982702,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","Asian Journal of Education and Training  \nVol. 6, No. 1, 72-79, 2020 ISSN(E): 2519-5387  \nDOI: 10.20448/journal.522.2020 .61.72.79  \n© 2020 by the authors; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group  \nCritical Thinking Dispositions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates  \nSalih USLU   \nNiğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Turkey.  \nAbstract  \nThe main aim of this study is, to analyze critical thinking disposition of social studies teacher candidates. The study group is consisting of totally 250 teacher candidates voluntarily who are students of education faculty at social studies department in a state university. This study is used with descriptive survey method. The \"Personal Information Form\" was developed by the researchers used as data collection tools and The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI-R) which was developed by Facione, Facione, and Giancarlo (1998) and translated into Turkish by Kökdemir (2003) was used. Research data were analyzed with IBM SPSS 21.0 program. The independent samples t-test and One Way ANOVA were used for analyzing the datum. At the end of the study, it has been determined that in generally social studies teacher candidates have low level critical thinking disposition, obtained the average score related with subscales while the highest scores at the Analyticity subscale, the lowest average scores at Systematicity subscale. It has been seen that critical thinking disposition were not differentiated in terms of gender and class variables generally while significant differences were detected in the subscale dimensions. Some suggestions have been made in the light of these findings.  \nKeywords: Social studies, Critical, Critical thinking, Critical thinking disposition, Teacher candidates, Thinking.  \nFunding: This study received no specific financial support.  \nCompeting Interests: The author declares that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.  \nTransparency: The author confirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study was reported; that no vital features of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.  \nEthical: This study follows all ethical practices during writing.  \nContents  \n1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 73  \n2. Method ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 74  \n3. Findings and Results ....................................................................................................................................................................... 75  \n4. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 76  \nReferences .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 78  \nContribution of this paper to the literature  \nThis study contributes to the existing literature by analyzing critical thinking disposition of social studies teacher candidates. The study group is consisting of totally 250 teacher candidates voluntarily who are students of education faculty at social studies department in a state university. This study is used with descriptive survey method.  \n1. Introduction  \nAt though information era nowadays, it is considered that the students‟ active participation process is more important than the teachers present in education. Also it has become important the students critical thinking skills in which case can be used effective","cbCaijMkyQ6qNj62","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijMkyQ6qNj62","pdf",593271,"English","# Introduction\n# Method\n# Findings and Results\n# Conclusion\n# References","[{\"question\":\"What is the main aim of the study?\",\"answer\":\"To analyze the critical thinking disposition of social studies teacher candidates.\"},{\"question\":\"How was critical thinking disposition measured?\",\"answer\":\"The study used the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI-R) together with a Personal Information Form.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the main findings about critical thinking disposition levels?\",\"answer\":\"Social studies teacher candidates showed generally low critical thinking disposition, with the highest Analyticity scores and the lowest Systematicity scores.\"}]","Critical Thinking Dispositions of Social Studies Teacher Candidates | PDF",1792075593]