[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31554":3,"doc-seo-31554":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31554,549758146520,"Patrick","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80002397d8c0411e94?_k=1775819394049821470",8,"Research & Report","Critical Perspectives on Accounting Trust in International Cooperation Emotional and Cognitive Trust Complement Each Other Over Time","Trust is central to international cooperation and development yet remains poorly understood. Scholarship commonly treats trust as eroded and replaced by regulated controls or as lost, reduced to calculative cognitive procedures that support accountability. A case study of a Colombian human-rights NGO funded by Northern donors shows trust is bidimensional and dynamic, with emotional and cognitive dimensions shifting in importance across relationship stages: setup and donor attraction, funding consolidation, project implementation, reporting/audit, and renewal decisions.","cbCaii18ygSO11WS","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaii18ygSO11WS","pdf",639856,1,23,"English","en","# Introduction\n## Trust as Regulation and Lost Trust\n## Cognitive Trust and Accountability\n## Emotional Dimension and Trust Dynamics\n## Case Study Approach and Key Findings\n## Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"Why does the document argue that trust remains poorly understood in international cooperation research?\",\"answer\":\"The research tradition frames trust in two opposing but incomplete ways: either trust is replaced by regulated accountability mechanisms or trust is treated as a purely cognitive, calculative exercise.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the study claim about trust in the NGO–donor relationship over time?\",\"answer\":\"Trust is bidimensional and dynamic: emotional and cognitive trust complement each other and change in salience as the relationship moves through different stages.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the importance of emotional versus cognitive trust evolve across the relationship stages?\",\"answer\":\"Emotional trust dominates early when the NGO sets up its mission and attracts donors; cognitive trust becomes key when donors decide to fund; cognitive trust is most salient during reporting and audit; emotional trust becomes critical again when the NGO and donors consider renewing the relationship.\"}]",1779742833,58,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"critical-perspectives-on-accounting-trust-in-international-cooperation-emotional-and-cognitive-trust-complement-each-other-over-time","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/critical-perspectives-on-accounting-trust-in-international-cooperation-emotional-and-cognitive-trust-complement-each-other-over-time/31554/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-25",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"Why does the document argue that trust remains poorly understood in international cooperation research?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The research tradition frames trust in two opposing but incomplete ways: either trust is replaced by regulated accountability mechanisms or trust is treated as a purely cognitive, calculative exercise.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What does the study claim about trust in the NGO–donor relationship over time?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Trust is bidimensional and dynamic: emotional and cognitive trust complement each other and change in salience as the relationship moves through different stages.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"How does the importance of emotional versus cognitive trust evolve across the relationship stages?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"Emotional trust dominates early when the NGO sets up its mission and attracts donors; cognitive trust becomes key when donors decide to fund; cognitive trust is most salient during reporting and audit; emotional trust becomes critical again when the NGO and donors consider renewing the relationship.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]