[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-339890-105":59,"doc-detail-339890-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","criminal-law-learning-set-1-practice-questions-set-13","Criminal Law Learning Set 1 - Practice Questions Set 13","","A set of criminal law learning and practice questions focused on core legal principles and application in exam-style scenarios. Includes multiple-choice items testing the level of intent required for offences and the legal treatment of undertakings in solicitor-client and transactional contexts. Answer explanations evaluate why certain options are correct or incorrect, emphasizing interpretation of statutory provisions and the effect of qualified statements or reliance by counterparties.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/criminal-law-learning-set-1-practice-questions-set-13/339890/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/criminal-law-learning-set-1-practice-questions-set-13/339890.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jiven","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-21","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":14},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What level of intent is required for the defendant to be guilty under the offence discussed?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The correct choice is specific intent. The provided explanation argues the section contains nothing requiring intent by the defendant and that incorrect options do not match the statutory requirement as framed in the question.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Was there a breach of undertaking in the solicitor statement scenario involving sending a deed?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"No breach is indicated. The explanation states the undertaking was qualified by the promise to hand over the deed when the solicitor held a signed copy, so the failure linked to the client’s death did not constitute breach.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How do the explanations treat an oral solicitor statement when assessing undertaking or breach?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The material explains that an oral statement can be capable of being an undertaking, but in this scenario the solicitor qualified the statement regardless, which removes breach even if an answer choice claims the statement was oral.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},339890,1792590315,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":14,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":81,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":39,"preview_page_count":4},1099513958607,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002390cf8733938c?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778829742770036399","borbri  \nCriminal Law  \nLearning Questions  \nCriminal Law Learning Set 1  \n\n| UEIII⁴   | [  \u003Cbr>田  \u003Cbr>厚   |\n| --- | --- |\n| Item5   |  |\n| ltem6   |  |\n| Item7   |  |\n| Item8   |  |\n| lItem 9   |  |\n| Item 10   | a  \u003Cbr>《   |\n| Item 11   |  |\n|  |  |\n\nSection 143(1)(a)of the Road Traffic Act 198B states 'a person must not use a motor vehicle on a road or other public place unless there is in force in relation to the use ofthat vehicle by that person a policy of insurance\".  \nWhat is the leve of intent needed by the defendant to be guilty of the offence?  \n\n| A   | Specific intent.   |\n| --- | --- |\n| B   | Basic intent.   |\n| C    | Neglgence.   |\n| D   | Knowledge.   |\n| E   | None.   |\n\nLearning QuestionsmmarLawLeamgroe  \n5of 12    06:09  \nII  \nEI⁴  \nSection 143(1(a)of the Road Trafic Act 198B states'a person must not use a motor vehicle on a road or other publie place unessthere sin fore n elation to the use ofthat vehicle by that person a policy of insurance\".  \nItem5  \n四  \nWhat is the level of intent needed by the defendant to be guilty of the offence?Answer Discussion-Incorrect  \nItem6  \n13  \n\n| A   | Specific intent.   |\n| --- | --- |\n| B   | Basic intent.   |\n| C   | Negligence.   |\n| D   | Knowledge.   |\n| E   | None.   |\n\nItem7  \n日  \n⑦  \nItem8  \n厚  \nItem9  \nZ  \nItem 10  \nItem 11  \n\u003C  \n(F is the corect answer because there is nothing within th section above that requies any intent on behalf of the defendant to be guity of the fnce.Ofnces ofstiet labilty do not requre any intent on the part of the defendant for the defendant to be guilty.fit were a crime of speifc intent,the section would ave to say thatthe defendant intended to drive without insurance.There is nothing in this setion that requrestis.Therefore (A)is ncorect.(B)is wrong because for basic intnt adefendant would have to intend to not be insured o be reckless as to obtaininginsurance.Nothing in this sectio staes this.There is no requirement of neglilgence orknowedge either,therefore(C)and(D)are incorect.QUESTION ID:CRL039  \n# Mixed Subjects\n\n## Learning Questions\n\nPractice Questions Set 13  \n\n| Item1   | [3  \u003Cbr>田  \u003Cbr>厚   |\n| --- | --- |\n| Item2   |  |\n| Item3   |  |\n| Item4   |  |\n| tem 5   |  |\n| Item6   |  |\n|  | Z   |\n| Item7   |  |\n| ltem8   |  |\n\nAt9.30am a solicitortold a partner n the other side of a ransaction that he woud send the partner a deed signed by thesolicitors clen s soo as he held a signed copy.  \nTh client had an apointment to se hersolicito to sign the deed at11.00am that day.The clent did not make it into the fice as she had a heart atack at 10.30am and  \nunfortunatey died.The partner on the othorside of the ransaction had reasonably relied on the solicitors statement and has acused the solicitor of being in breach of  \nundertaking.  \nWas there a breach of undertaking under these facts?  \nA  \nNo,because the undertaking could not be fulfilled due to death of the client.  \nB  \nYes,because the deed was not sent.  \nC No,bocause the statement was oral,not written.  \nD  \nNo,because the solicitor indicated that he would send the deed as soon as he receivedit and he did not receive it.  \nE  \nYes,because compassion is not required under the Rules.  \n## Learning Questions\n\nltem1  \nAt 9.30am a solicitor tod a patner on the other side of a transaction that he would sen the partner a ded signed by the solicitors client as soon as he held a signed copy.  \nThe client had an appointment ose horslicitorto sign the deed at11.00am that day.The cient did not mak it into th ofie as she had a heartatackat 10.30am and  \ntem2  \nunfortunately died.The partner on the othe side of h transaction had reasonaby reled on the solicitors statement and has accused the solicitor of being in breach of  \nundertaking.  \n[  \nItem 3  \n田  \nWas there a breach of undertaking under these facts?  \nItem4  \n⑦  \nA  \nNo,because the undertaking could not be fufiled due to death of the client.  \nltem5  \n厚  \nB  \nYes,because the deed was not sent.  \nltem6  \na  \nItem 7  \nC  \nNo,because","cbCaifT26OIenDXH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifT26OIenDXH","pdf",1019729,"English","# Learning Questions\n## Criminal Law Learning Set 1\n## Practice Questions Set 13","[{\"question\":\"What level of intent is required for the defendant to be guilty under the offence discussed?\",\"answer\":\"The correct choice is specific intent. The provided explanation argues the section contains nothing requiring intent by the defendant and that incorrect options do not match the statutory requirement as framed in the question.\"},{\"question\":\"Was there a breach of undertaking in the solicitor statement scenario involving sending a deed?\",\"answer\":\"No breach is indicated. The explanation states the undertaking was qualified by the promise to hand over the deed when the solicitor held a signed copy, so the failure linked to the client’s death did not constitute breach.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the explanations treat an oral solicitor statement when assessing undertaking or breach?\",\"answer\":\"The material explains that an oral statement can be capable of being an undertaking, but in this scenario the solicitor qualified the statement regardless, which removes breach even if an answer choice claims the statement was oral.\"}]","Criminal Law Learning Set 1 - Practice Questions Set 13 | PDF",1790032952]