[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-319878-105":59,"doc-detail-319878-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","cp-wall-test-results-ledgestone-radius-summary-of-test-results","CP Wall Test Results Ledgestone Radius - Summary of Test Results","","Summary of test results for segmental retaining wall unit Ledgestone Radius, evaluated under ASTM C1372. The report lists project and lab identifiers, including project number LNBC-1601 and report date August 17, 2016. It provides physical property outcomes such as net and gross compressive strength (min. 3000 psi) with averages around 5050–5100 psi, density near 129.4 pcf, and absorption averaging 8.0% against a maximum of 13%. Individual compression and absorption specimen tables document specimen loads, compressive strengths, and moisture/density-derived net volume and net area metrics.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/cp-wall-test-results-ledgestone-radius-summary-of-test-results/319878/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/cp-wall-test-results-ledgestone-radius-summary-of-test-results/319878.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"River Wang","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-20",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What standard governs the unit tests in this report?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The units were tested according to ASTM C140, and the set is stated to meet the absorption and compressive strength requirements of ASTM C1372.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What were the average compressive strength results?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Average gross compressive strength is 5050 psi and average net compressive strength is 5100 psi, with the specified minimum at 3000 psi.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What absorption performance was measured for the units?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Absorption was measured with an average value of 8.0%, compared to a specification maximum of 13%.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},319878,1790792839,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":81,"preview_page_count":4},1099514067438,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539ee87300030?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780474512215547542","Client:  Cambridge Pavers, Inc.  Address:  PO Box 157   Lyndhurst, NJ 07071   \nUnit Specification:  ASTM C1372   \nUnit Designation and  \nDescription:  Segmental Retaining Wall Unit   Ledgestone Radius   \nSummary of Test Results  \nProject No.:  LNBC-1601   \nReport Date:  August 17, 2016   \nProject Name:  Cambridge Wallstone Concrete Lab Tests   \nDate Received:  August 3, 2016   \nDate of Compression Testing:  August 16, 2016   \n Laboratory Number:10- 142182   \n| Physical Property | Specification\u003Cbr>Values | Average\u003Cbr>Test\u003Cbr>Results |  | Physical Property | Specification\u003Cbr>Values | Average Test\u003Cbr>Results |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Net Compressive Strength (min. ) | 3000 | 5100 | psi | Min. Faceshell Thickness (FST) |  | in. |\n| Gross Compressive Strength |  | 5050 | psi | Min. Web Thickness (WT) |  | in. |\n| Density |  | 129.4 | pcf | Equivalent Web Thickness |  | in. |\n| Absorption (max. ) | 13 | 8.0 | pcf | Equivalent Thickness |  | in. |\n| Percent Solid |  | 98.0 | % | Normalized Web Area |  | in.2/ft.2 |\n| Net Cross-Sectional Area |  | 16.42 | in. 2 | Max. Var. From Spec. Dimensions |  | in. |\n| Gross Cross-Sectional Area |  | 16.58 | in. 2 | Moisture Content |  | % |\n\nIndividual Unit Test Results Tests conducted on reduced size units.  \nCompression Units  \nAbsorption Units  \n\n| Specimen\u003Cbr>No. | Received Wt, WR | Cross-Sectional Area |  | Max. Load | Compressive Strength |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  | Gross | Net* |  | Gross | Net |\n|  | lb. | in. 2 | in. 2 | lb | psi | psi |\n| 4 |  | 16.59 | 16.47 | 89450 | 5390 | 5430 |\n| 5 |  | 16.47 | 16.41 | 61135 | 3710 | 3720 |\n| 6 |  | 16.70 | 16.39 | 101210 | 6060 | 6170 |\n| Average |  | 16.58 | 16.42 | 83930 | 5050 | 5100 |\n\n* Net area determined from absorption specimens unless solid units are used.  \n\n| Specimen\u003Cbr>No. | Average Width | Average\u003Cbr>Height | Average Length | Average Min.\u003Cbr>FST | Average\u003Cbr>Min. WT | Normalized\u003Cbr>Web Area |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | in. | in. | in. | in. | in. | In.2/ft2 |\n| 1 | 2.10 | 4.03 | 7.99 |  |  |  |\n| 2 | 2.07 | 4.04 | 7.97 |  |  |  |\n| 3 | 2.14 | 4.05 | 8.00 |  |  |  |\n| Average | 2.10 | 4.04 | 7.99 |  |  |  |\n\n\n| Specimen\u003Cbr>No. | Received\u003Cbr>Wt, WR** | Immersed\u003Cbr>Wt,WI | Saturated Wt,\u003Cbr>WS | Oven-Dry\u003Cbr>Wt, WD | Absorption |  | Density | Net\u003Cbr>Volume |  | Net Area | Percent Solid | Moisture\u003Cbr>Content**\u003Cbr>% of total\u003Cbr>absorption |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | lb | lb | lb | lb | pcf | % | pcf | ft | 3 | in 2 | % |  |\n| 1 | 22.80 | 2.87 | 5.26 | 4.97 | 7.6 | 5.8 | 129.8 | 0.0383 |  | 16.49 | 98.0 |  |\n| 2 | 22.44 | 2.82 | 5.17 | 4.88 | 7.7 | 5.9 | 129.6 | 0.0376 |  | 16.43 | 97.8 |  |\n| 3 | 22.42 | 2.95 | 5.40 | 5.06 | 8.7 | 6.7 | 128.9 | 0.0392 |  | 16.39 | 98.1 |  |\n| Average | 22.55 | 2.88 | 5.28 | 4.97 | 8.0 | 6.2 | 129.4 | 0.0384 |  | 16.43 | 98.0 |  |\n\n**Received weight determined at the time of unit delivery to the job site or from units sampled at that time and delivered to the laboratory in  \nsealed containers for moisture content determination.  \nRemarks:  The units were tested according to ASTM C140 . This set meets the absorption and compressive strength requirements of ASTM C1372   \nChas M. Snyder, PE Laboratory Manager","cbCaikmCpAoeQdNc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikmCpAoeQdNc","pdf",317556,"English","# Summary of Test Results\n## Project and Report Details\n## Physical Property Results\n## Individual Compression Unit Test Results\n## Individual Absorption Unit Test Results\n## Remarks and Standard References","[{\"question\":\"What standard governs the unit tests in this report?\",\"answer\":\"The units were tested according to ASTM C140, and the set is stated to meet the absorption and compressive strength requirements of ASTM C1372.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the average compressive strength results?\",\"answer\":\"Average gross compressive strength is 5050 psi and average net compressive strength is 5100 psi, with the specified minimum at 3000 psi.\"},{\"question\":\"What absorption performance was measured for the units?\",\"answer\":\"Absorption was measured with an average value of 8.0%, compared to a specification maximum of 13%.\"}]","CP Wall Test Results Ledgestone Radius - Summary of Test Results | PDF",1789947641]