[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-294340-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-294340-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","cop-2023-2024-program-assessment-outcome-threshold-methodologies","COP 2023-2024 Program Assessment - Outcome Threshold Methodologies","","Program assessment results for the COP span continuous quality improvement outcomes for Summer 2023 and related academic-year activities. Each outcome is evaluated against defined thresholds using methods such as NAPLEX/MPJE pass-rate monitoring, faculty and student association participation reports, student advising surveys, student-to-advisor ratios, faculty productivity and funded research grant tracking, and A&E plan data collection. The record highlights both achieved targets and improvement areas, including RCA-driven recommendations, onboarding of new curriculum elements, and updates scheduled through the next reporting cycles.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/","Exam",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/cop-2023-2024-program-assessment-outcome-threshold-methodologies/294340/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/cop-2023-2024-program-assessment-outcome-threshold-methodologies/294340.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Levi","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",10,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"How are entry-level pharmacist competency outcomes evaluated in this assessment?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Competency is assessed using NAPLEX pass rates, pass-rate ranking thresholds, and annual tracking of students meeting minimum NAPLEX domain performance. MPJE pass rates and ranking against peer and Illinois weighted averages are also used.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What methods are used to measure professional association engagement?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Faculty participation is measured through departmental annual reports tracking meeting attendance and leadership/committee roles. Student association membership is measured through the Office of Student Life.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How is the Student Advising program effectiveness evaluated?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Effectiveness is measured using end-of-quarter survey results for agreement on adequate advisor access, plus the student-to-advisor ratio from Office of Student Affairs.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},294340,1789682789,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,95,100,105,110,115,120,123,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":125},"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":33,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":55},7971461740909,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","| Outcome | Threshold | Methodologies | Summer 2023 | Achieved or Needs Improvement | Summary of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Actions |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| P1. COP produces competent entrylevel pharmacists | a. NAPLEX pass rates are at or above the national and peer average | NAPLEX | 56.3%(COP 2023) Nat'l avg: 78. 6% | Needs Improvement | An RCA was conducted to address NAPLEX and MPJE scores; a wide variety of recommendations were implemented to address these exams. |\n|  | b. NAPLEX pass rate rank is at or within 5% of the top ranked competitor school | MPJE | 56.3%(COP 2023) Top score: 91.7% | Needs Improvement |  |\n|  | c. The percent of students meeting or exceeding the minimum NAPLEX domain performance necessary to demonstrate competency is tracked annually. | NAPLEX calendar year report-Table 5 | COP 2023:\u003Cbr>Domain 1 (interpret data): 56% Domain 2 (drug characteristics): 53% Domain 3 (treatment plans): 50% Domain 4 (calculations): 41% Domain 5 (compound/dispense): 53% Domain 6 (med use systems): 59% | - | - |\n|  | d. MPJE pass rates are at or above the Illinois weighted average | MPJE | 45%(COP 2023) IL weighted avg: 61% | Needs Improvement | An RCA was conducted to address NAPLEX and MPJE scores; a wide variety of recommendations were implemented to address these exams. |\n|  | e. MPJE pass rate rank is at or within 5% of the top ranked Illinois school | MPJE | 45%(COP 2023)\u003Cbr>Top score: 75% | Needs Improvement |  |\n| P2. COP is active in national/international professional Pharmacy associations | a. 80% of COP faculty attend at least one professional pharmacy meeting annually, excluding faculty \u003C 0.5 FTE or Research Professors | Departmental\u003Cbr>annual report | 77% | Needs Improvement | Reduced travel for meetings was due to budgetary constraints and personal reasons for not traveling. |\n|  | b. 25% of COP faculty hold leadership or committee-level positions in a professional pharmacy association | Departmental\u003Cbr>annual report | 54% | Achieved | - |\n|  | c. 60% of students are members of local or national pharmacy associations | Office of Student\u003Cbr>Life | 66% | Achieved | - |\n\n\n| Outcome | Threshold | Methodologies | Summer 2023 | Achieved or Needs Improvement | Summary of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Actions |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| P3. COP is active in service to the Pharmacy profession | a. 50% of the COP faculty participate in professional activities representing COP outside of the college (e.g. delivering CE, consultation with other schools/ programs, national exam development, service-related presentations, poster presentations, etc. ) | Departmental\u003Cbr>annual report | 69% | Achieved | - |\n| P4. COP has an effective Student Advising program | a. At least 90% of students \"agree\" or\"strongly agree\" with the end-ofquarter question, \"Access to my faculty advisor is adequate for my needs\" | End of Quarter\u003Cbr>Survey | P1: 99%\u003Cbr>P2: 99%\u003Cbr>P3: 97% | Achieved | - |\n|  | b. Student:advisor ratio is less than or equal to 10:1 | Office of Student\u003Cbr>Affairs | 7.3 | Achieved | - |\n| P5. COP promotes active research and scholarship | a. The scholarly output of the college, as measured by the faculty productivity model is maintained or increased annually. | Faculty Productivity\u003Cbr>Model | 251.3% FTE among 25 faculty (median 6. 1%) | Needs Improvement | Continue to monitor; a significant amount of faculty time in 2023- 2024 was devoted to the NAPLEX/MPJE RCA and the new P1 curriculum. |\n|  | b. The sum of new and continuing grants is tracked annually | AACP Funded Research Grant Institution Tables | Total: $354,000 3-yr avg: $235,741 3 funded investigators | - | - |\n|  | c. The total number of grants applied for is tracked annually | DR request to\u003Cbr>faculty | (New endpoint – will begin tracking next year) | - | - |\n|  | d. 5% of P1-P3 students are involved in research & scholarship | Annual Research\u003Cbr>Report | 18% | Achieved | - |\n\n\n| P6. COP regularly collects data poi","cbCaiaMvp3jj47x2","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaMvp3jj47x2","pdf",204141,"English","# Outcome\n## P1-P2 Outcomes\n## P3-P5 Outcomes\n## P6-P8 Outcomes","[{\"question\":\"How are entry-level pharmacist competency outcomes evaluated in this assessment?\",\"answer\":\"Competency is assessed using NAPLEX pass rates, pass-rate ranking thresholds, and annual tracking of students meeting minimum NAPLEX domain performance. MPJE pass rates and ranking against peer and Illinois weighted averages are also used.\"},{\"question\":\"What methods are used to measure professional association engagement?\",\"answer\":\"Faculty participation is measured through departmental annual reports tracking meeting attendance and leadership/committee roles. Student association membership is measured through the Office of Student Life.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the Student Advising program effectiveness evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"Effectiveness is measured using end-of-quarter survey results for agreement on adequate advisor access, plus the student-to-advisor ratio from Office of Student Affairs.\"}]","COP 2023-2024 Program Assessment - Outcome Threshold Methodologies | PDF"]