[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-516824-105":59,"doc-detail-516824-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","continue-reading-chief-examiners-reports-bece-2018-english-2-report-and-proposed-treatments","Continue reading Chief Examiners' Reports - BECE 2018 English 2 - Report and proposed treatments","","Chief Examiner reports for BECE 2018 (English, Part A/B/C) assess paper clarity, alignment with curriculum, and candidate performance. The report notes the paper standard matched prior years, with questions clear and within range. Strengths include effective English usage and competence in understanding and literature. Weaknesses cover confusion in article writing requirements, limited vocabulary, grammatical errors, and low knowledge of selected texts and comprehension, with poor handling of wh-questions. Proposed remedies focus on grammar study, distinguishing article types, wider reading and dictionary use, writing exercises, careful question reading, and studying literary instruments.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/continue-reading-chief-examiners-reports-bece-2018-english-2-report-and-proposed-treatments/516824/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/continue-reading-chief-examiners-reports-bece-2018-english-2-report-and-proposed-treatments/516824.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Bulrr","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-11","2026-10-07",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How does the report describe the BECE 2018 English paper standard?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The report states the paper standard was similar to previous years. The questions were clear, within the curriculum, and at the level of the candidates.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What are the main strengths identified among candidates?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Candidates used English wisely and demonstrated knowledge of the official features of the articles they wrote. Their work in understanding and literature parts was generally good.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What weaknesses and difficulties are highlighted, and what remedies are proposed?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Weaknesses include confusion between similar writing requirements, loss of focus on question demands, limited vocabulary, and grammatical errors, along with low knowledge of selected texts and difficulties with wh-questions. Remedies recommend stronger grammar study, distinguishing article types, wider reading with dictionary use, more writing exercises, careful reading of selected texts and questions, and learning techniques for comprehension questions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},516824,1791543005,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":81,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":39,"preview_page_count":4},5909892115043,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","Continue  \nChief examiners report 2018 bece  \nThe chief examiner agreed in their reports that the level of paperwork was positive compared to the previous year. The questions were within the range of candidates. These treaties were clear and direct and there was no ambiguity. Tags: BECE , Head Examinerreport Report , English , French , GES , Ghanaian Language , Home Economics , ICT , JHS , Mathematics , RME , Visual Arts , WAEC September 14 , 2020 February 6 , 20 April 16 , 2020 March 28 , 2020 July 9 , November 2019 , November 2 , 2015 The heads of examiners agreed in their reports that the level of paperwork compared to the previous year. The questions were within the scope of... Continuing to read wassce 2018 chief examiners' reports , the Chief Examinera agreed in their reports that the paperwork standard compares positively with the previous year. The questions were within the scope of... Continuing to read the Heads of Examiners' WASSCE 2017 reports the chief examiners agreed in their reports that the standard of paperwork compares positively with what it was the previous year. The questions were within the scope of... Continue reading the Chief Examiners' BECE 2017 reports below is the 2016 WASSCE Chief Examiner's Report showing the strengths and weaknesses of candidates and proposed remedies. It also touches on what teachers should look for when preparing ... Continuing reading 2016 WASSCE Chief Examiners report although some countries such as Nigeria have banned students from taking external exams for final year students , Ghanaian students are to write a basic education certificate exam and pass a high school diploma in West African exams. For the success of this year's BECE candidates , it is very useful to go through the mistakes made by students in past years in order to be vigilant and avoid them. The following is the Report of the Chief Examiner on English for BECE 2018. English 2 : 2018 1. The paper standard was similar to that of previous years. The questions were clear , within the curriculum and at the level of the candidates. The performance of the candidates showed little improvement compared to last year. The paper consisted of three parts: Part A consisted of three essay questions asking candidates to answer only one in at least 250 words. Part B was to understand. Here , the candidates were given a passage to read and answer questions. Part C ( Literature) consisted of mandatory questions based on selected excerpts from Darmani L. And Sakhi J.A. and excerpts were taken specifically from Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist; 2. Summary of the strengths of a few candidates make a wise use of the English language , displaying a remarkable degree of knowledge The official features of the articles they wrote. Some candidates seemed adept at answering questions about the understandings and literature in the paper because their work in these parts was good. 3. Summary of the candidates' weaknesses , a number of candidates were unable to say a debate from a regular dialectic writing , and therefore wrote the first instead of the second. Some candidates also appear to have lost focus on the requirements of the article's questions. For example , there were a number of candidates who answered question 3 and , instead of requesting the maintenance of existing buildings , requested the establishment of new structures. Again , others showed that there were no appropriate vocabulary materials , hampering their ability to express themselves clearly and meaningfully. Grammatical errors and synthego inhibit in the answers of almost all the filters and thus significantly imitate their marks. In addition , many candidates showed very little knowledge of the specific texts of T he Cockcrow and received significantly low scores. Questions about speech numbers also make it very difficult for most candidates. Finally , many candidates had difficulty answering wh. 4 questions. Proposed treatments (1) Candidates should pay more attenti","cbCaia13rJadSfRH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaia13rJadSfRH","pdf",68913,"English","# English 2 (BECE 2018)\n## Paper standard and structure\n## Strengths of candidates\n## Weaknesses of candidates\n## Proposed treatments\n## Detailed comments - Part A article questions","[{\"question\":\"How does the report describe the BECE 2018 English paper standard?\",\"answer\":\"The report states the paper standard was similar to previous years. The questions were clear, within the curriculum, and at the level of the candidates.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the main strengths identified among candidates?\",\"answer\":\"Candidates used English wisely and demonstrated knowledge of the official features of the articles they wrote. Their work in understanding and literature parts was generally good.\"},{\"question\":\"What weaknesses and difficulties are highlighted, and what remedies are proposed?\",\"answer\":\"Weaknesses include confusion between similar writing requirements, loss of focus on question demands, limited vocabulary, and grammatical errors, along with low knowledge of selected texts and difficulties with wh-questions. Remedies recommend stronger grammar study, distinguishing article types, wider reading with dictionary use, more writing exercises, careful reading of selected texts and questions, and learning techniques for comprehension questions.\"}]","Continue reading Chief Examiners' Reports - BECE 2018 English 2 - Report and proposed treatments | PDF",1791332842]