[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-289027-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-289027-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","conference-proposal-rubric-success-stories","Conference Proposal Rubric - Success Stories","","Conference Proposal Rubric - Success Stories defines a structured scoring sheet for evaluating a success-stories presentation. It guides proposers and reviewers to provide proposal identity information, assign points for each criterion, and calculate totals. Evaluation focuses on alignment with the Student Success Pillar objectives, relevance to a broad professional audience in student success, RU practitioner divisions, and the presence of nuanced contributions, clear audience take-aways, and a foundation in established theory and best practices, plus organization and fit to format and time requirements.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/conference-proposal-rubric-success-stories/289027/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/conference-proposal-rubric-success-stories/289027.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Ben ","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What information must be provided on the rubric sheet before scoring?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Provide the proposer’s name and the proposal number/title, then assign points for each criterion and total the points at the bottom of the sheet, adding scores and any additional comments on the spreadsheet.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How is relevance to the conference audience evaluated?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Scores distinguish whether the content is useful for all audience members across student success offices and faculty, relevant for practitioners across at least two divisions, or only for a limited subset of attendees.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What elements are required for the highest rating on audience take-aways and expertise?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"A top score requires clear and practical tools, practices, or resources that participants can implement, plus grounding in well-accepted theory or known best practices and sound methods demonstrating success.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},289027,1789634417,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":55,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":30,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":55,"preview_page_count":4},2336478951081,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Conference Proposal Rubric: Success Stories  \nDirections: Provide your name and the proposal number/title, assign points for each criterion, and total the points at the bottom of the sheet. Please add the score and any additional comments on the spreadsheet.  \nProposal Name   \nProposal Presenter:   Reviewer:    \n\n| CRITERIA (Points Possible) | MEETS OR EXCEEDS CRITERIA\u003Cbr>(10 PTS) | ACCEPTABLE\u003Cbr>(5 PTS) | NOT ACCEPTABLE\u003Cbr>(2 OR 0 PTS) | PTS |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Relevance to the conference mission:\u003Cbr>Is the connection to the three objectives of the Student Success Pillar evident? | This presentation is directly targeted to address at least one of the priorities within the Student Success Pillar of the AMP and all elements relate to student success as defined in the AMP report. | This presentation addresses student success generally, though its connection to specific objectives within the Student Success Pillar of the AMP may be somewhat ambiguous. | This presentation does not directly address any topics that would be of relevance to the Student Success Pillar of the AMP. |  |\n| Relevance to the audience: Will this content be relevant to the majority of the audience, which consists of professionals across student success offices and faculty. | This presentation would be useful for all audience members, including practitioners across Student Affairs, Undergraduate Education, Enrollment Management, Graduate student support, and faculty. | This presentation would be relevant for a large percentage of practitioners across at least two divisions. | This presentation would only be relevant to a limited audience, which does not make up a large percentage of the conference attendees. |  |\n| Nuanced contributions to the field of student success or to the RU community of practitioners:\u003Cbr>Will this presentation provide a nuanced perspective on a topic, a localized specific example of best practices within the field, or firsthand research related to | The proposal will provide a nuanced or localized perspective on known best practices that can contribute to the larger national discussion of practices supporting student success. | The proposal provides an example of implementing known best practices, though the information proposed is not particularly new or nuanced. | The proposal references concepts that are outdated or disproved, or that are in opposition to known best practices, without providing explanation for the continued use of these concepts despite their lack of support in the field. |  |\n\n\n| student success as defined in the AMP? |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Audience Take-aways: Are there clearly defined tools, practices, or resources shared that can be implemented by audience members? | Audience Take-aways for\u003Cbr>participants are clear and practical. | Audience Take-aways participants are somewhat clear. | Audience Take-aways for participants are not clear. |  |\n| Foundation & expertise: Is the proposal grounded in established theory, known best practices, and/or sound research methods? | The presentations is grounded in well-accepted theory or known best practices, and includes sound methods for demonstrating success. | The presentation includes limited indication that the practices discussed will be connected to a accepted theoretical framework or known best practices. | The presentation is not wellfounded upon theory and known best practices. |  |\n| CRITERIA (Points Possible) | MEETS OR EXCEEDS CRITERIA\u003Cbr>(5 PTS) | ACCEPTABLE\u003Cbr>(3 PTS) | NOT ACCEPTABLE\u003Cbr>(1 OR 0 PTS) | PTS |\n| Organization of ideas: The proposal is well-organized, with a structure that will be easy for participants to follow and grasp. The content fits well within the proposed format. | The presentation description is well organized. The content meets the time requirements for a presentation. | The presentation description is somewhat organized though some connections may be unclear. The timing of the presentation may ","cbCaiaO3rPTXT9qR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaO3rPTXT9qR","pdf",179566,"English","# Evaluation Criteria\n## Alignment with Student Success Pillar\n## Audience Relevance\n## Nuanced Contributions and Field Value\n## Audience Take-aways\n## Foundation and Expertise\n## Organization and Presentation Fit\n# Review Questions and Comments","[{\"question\":\"What information must be provided on the rubric sheet before scoring?\",\"answer\":\"Provide the proposer’s name and the proposal number/title, then assign points for each criterion and total the points at the bottom of the sheet, adding scores and any additional comments on the spreadsheet.\"},{\"question\":\"How is relevance to the conference audience evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"Scores distinguish whether the content is useful for all audience members across student success offices and faculty, relevant for practitioners across at least two divisions, or only for a limited subset of attendees.\"},{\"question\":\"What elements are required for the highest rating on audience take-aways and expertise?\",\"answer\":\"A top score requires clear and practical tools, practices, or resources that participants can implement, plus grounding in well-accepted theory or known best practices and sound methods demonstrating success.\"}]","Conference Proposal Rubric - Success Stories | PDF"]