[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-353020-105":59,"doc-detail-353020-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","concurrent-appendectomy-in-patients-undergoing-surgery-for-gynecological-malignancies-a-retrospective-analysis-from-a-tertiary-referral-center","Concurrent Appendectomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Gynecological Malignancies - A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Referral Center","","Concurrent appendectomy during gynecologic oncology surgery aims to prevent postoperative appendicitis and identify occult appendiceal pathology, but its clinical value is debated. This retrospective study evaluated appendectomy specimen findings and their association with tumor type and stage in 300 women undergoing gynecologic oncologic surgery from July 2020 to April 2025, collecting clinical, surgical, and histopathologic data and analyzing outcomes with chi-square, t-test, and ANOVA.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/concurrent-appendectomy-in-patients-undergoing-surgery-for-gynecological-malignancies-a-retrospective-analysis-from-a-tertiary-referral-center/353020/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/concurrent-appendectomy-in-patients-undergoing-surgery-for-gynecological-malignancies-a-retrospective-analysis-from-a-tertiary-referral-center/353020.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"McQueen","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-22",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What was the main objective of the retrospective study?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"To evaluate appendectomy specimen findings and their association with tumor type and stage in patients undergoing surgery for gynecological malignancies.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How many patients were included, and what period did the study cover?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The study reviewed medical records of 300 women, covering surgeries from July 2020 to April 2025.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What did histopathology show about appendiceal findings?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Chronic inflammation was found in 40.7%, reactive changes in 34.3%, metastatic disease in 23.3%, benign neoplasms in 1.3%, and primary malignancy in 0.3%.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},353020,1790119814,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},5909890329169,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL 2026;47:826–832 Scan the QR to view  \nthe full-text article on the journal website  \nORIGINAL ARTICLE  \nConcurrent Appendectomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Gynecological Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Referral Center  \nGazi Güner, MD a,*, Can Tercan, MD d, Emrah Da˘gdeviren, MD d,  \nAli Selçuk Yeniocak, MD d, Ceylin Elbistanli, MD d, Sure Nur Erdo˘gmu ¸s, MD d, Ay ¸se Hazirbulan, MD a, Yi˘git Mert Bayrak, MD a, Neçirvan Ça˘gda ¸s Çaltek, MD a, Gözde ¸Sahin, MD a, Ergun Tercan, MD e, Figen Efe Çamili, MD b,  \nINl zbl AyTelmineVl uraYükls, MelD, M cD ,Haüseyin Karatay, MD f, Saniye Merve Gül Kara, MD g,  \na Department of Gynocologic Oncology Surgery, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey c Department of Gynecological Oncology Surgery, Yozgat City Hospital, Yozgat, Turkey  \nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey e Department of Pathology, Manisa Merkezefendi State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey  \nf Department of Pathology, Ba¸sak¸sehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey g Department of Gynecology and Obstterics, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Turkey  \nABSTRACT  \nObjectives: To evaluate appendectomy specimen findings and their association with tumor type and stage. Concurrent appendectomy is frequently performed during gynecologic oncology surgery to prevent postoperative appendicitis and detect occult pathology, yet its value remains debated.  \nMethods: In this study, we reviewed the medical records of 300 women who underwent gynecologic oncologic surgery accompanied by appendectomy at Ba¸sak¸sehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital (Istanbul, Türkiye) over the period from July 2020 to April 2025. Clinical, surgical, andhistopathologic data were collected. Appendiceal pathologies were categorized as reactive hyperplasia, chronic inflammation, benign neoplasms, metastatic tumors, or primary. Statistical analyses included chi-square, t-test, and ANOVA.  \nResults: Participants had an average age of 55.6 􀀆 13.4 years, and 61.7% of them were postmenopausal. Among ovarian tumors, malignant epithelial lesions represented 54.7% of cases, while borderline tumors accounted for 17.7% and benign tumors for 17%. Histopathology revealed chronic inflammation in 40.7%, reactive changes in 34.3%, metastatic disease in 23.3%, benign neoplasms in 1.3%, and primary malignancy in 0.3%. Metastases occurred only in malignant ovarian tumors (35.7%), predominantly high-grade serous carcinomas (p \u003C 0.001). Borderline and benign tumors were mainly associated with reactive findings, and no metastatic involvement was detected.  \nReceived 17 September 2025; accepted 7 December 2025.  \nAvailable online 27 April 2026  \n* Corresponding author.  \nE-mail addresses: [dr.gaziguner01@gmail.com](dr.gaziguner01@gmail.com) (G. Güner), [cntrcn89@gmail.com](cntrcn89@gmail.com) (C. Tercan), [dagdeviren_emrah_58@hotmail.com](dagdeviren_emrah_58@hotmail.com) (E. Da˘gdeviren),  \n[A.s.yeniocak@hotmail.com](A.s.yeniocak@hotmail.com) (A. S. Yeniocak), [ceylinelbistanli@gmail.com](ceylinelbistanli@gmail.com) (C. Elbistanli), [sureerdogmus@gmail.com](sureerdogmus@gmail.com) (S. N. Erdo˘gmu¸s),  \n[aysehazirbulan@gmail.com](aysehazirbulan@gmail.com) (A. Hazirbulan), [yigitmertbayrak@gmail.com](yigitmertbayrak@gmail.com) (Y. M. Bayrak), [nccaltek@gmail.com](nccaltek@gmail.com) (N. C. Caltek), [sahin.gozde1983@gmail.com](sahin.gozde1983@gmail.com)  \n(G. Sahin), [ergntrcn@gmail.com](ergntrcn@gmail.com) (E. Tercan), efefi[genefe@gmail.com](genefe@gmail.com) (F. E. Çamili), [draylinvural@gmail.com](draylinvural@gmail.com) (N. A. Vural), [huseyin140@gmail.com](huseyin140@gmail.com) (H.  \nKaratay), [drs.mervegul@gmail.com](drs.mervegul@gmail.com) (S. M. G. Kara), [drilkbaltemel@gmail.com](drilkbaltemel@gmail.com) (˙I. T. Yüksel).  \n[https://doi.org/10.15537/1","cbCaimKq8VU7qrp2","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimKq8VU7qrp2","pdf",264830,"English","# Abstract\n## Objectives\n## Methods\n## Results\n## Conclusion\n# Introduction","[{\"question\":\"What was the main objective of the retrospective study?\",\"answer\":\"To evaluate appendectomy specimen findings and their association with tumor type and stage in patients undergoing surgery for gynecological malignancies.\"},{\"question\":\"How many patients were included, and what period did the study cover?\",\"answer\":\"The study reviewed medical records of 300 women, covering surgeries from July 2020 to April 2025.\"},{\"question\":\"What did histopathology show about appendiceal findings?\",\"answer\":\"Chronic inflammation was found in 40.7%, reactive changes in 34.3%, metastatic disease in 23.3%, benign neoplasms in 1.3%, and primary malignancy in 0.3%.\"}]","Concurrent Appendectomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Gynecological Malignancies - A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Referral Center | PDF",1790102596,18]