[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-500295-105":59,"doc-detail-500295-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","complaint-for-injunctive-and-declaratory-relief-complaint","COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF - Complaint","","Legal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California challenging California’s ban on the sale and personal construction of certain constitutionally protected arms commonly used for lawful purposes. Plaintiffs allege the “unsafe handgun” statutes and related personal manufacturing restrictions, together with defendants’ enforcement practices, prevent law-abiding citizens from purchasing protected handguns and restrict licensed retailers, violating the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/complaint-for-injunctive-and-declaratory-relief-complaint/500295/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/complaint-for-injunctive-and-declaratory-relief-complaint/500295.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Riley","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What relief are the plaintiffs requesting in this complaint?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief against the named defendants.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What legal challenge is being made in this case?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The complaint challenges California’s ban on the sale and personal construction of constitutionally protected arms commonly used for lawful purposes.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which laws and regulations does the complaint claim are responsible for the ban?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The complaint cites California’s “unsafe handgun” statutes, related personal manufacturing ban provisions, and defendants’ regulations and enforcement practices collectively referred to as California’s Handgun Ban.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},500295,1791376919,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},1374391975076,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000253ca4ec9f6853?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1783305029341752051","Case 3:20-cv-02190-DMS-DEB Document 1 Filed 11/10/20 PageID.1 Page 1 of 51  \n1  \n2  \n3  \n4  \n5  \n6  \n7  \n8  \n9  \n10  \n11  \n12  \n13  \n14  \n15  \n16  \n17  \n18  \n19  \n20  \n21  \n22  \n23  \n24  \n25  \n26  \n27  \n28  \nAttorneys for Plaintiffs  \nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  \nLANA RAE RENNA, an individual; DANIELLE JAYMES, an individual; HANNAH SPOUSTA, an individual; LAURA SCHWARTZ, an individual; MICHAEL SCHWARTZ, an individual; RICHARD BAILEY, an individual; JOHN KLIER, an individual; JUSTIN SMITH, an individual; JOHN PHILLIPS, an individual; PWGG, L.P., a California Limited Partnership;  \nCHERYL PRINCE, an individual; DARIN PRINCE, an individual; NORTH COUNTY SHOOTING CENTER, INC., a California Corporation; RYAN PETERSON, an individual; GUNFIGHTER TACTICAL, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC. ; SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS PAC; CITIZENS  \nCase No.  \nCOMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF  \n1  \nRaymond M. DiGuiseppe The DiGuiseppe Law Firm, P.C.  \n4320 Southport-Supply Road, Suite 300 Southport, NC 28461  \nTel.: 910-713-8804  \nEmail: [law.rmd@gmail.com](law.rmd@gmail.com)  \nMichael P. Sousa  \nLaw Offices of Michael P. Sousa, APC 3232 Governor Dr., Suite ASan Diego, CA 92122  \nTel.: 858-453-6122  \n[Email:](Email: msousa@msousalaw.com)[ ](Email: msousa@msousalaw.com)[msousa@msousalaw.com](Email: msousa@msousalaw.com)  \n'20CV2190 DMS DEB  \nCase 3:20-cv-02190-DMS-DEB Document 1 Filed 11/10/20 PageID.2 Page 2 of 51  \n1  \n2  \n3  \n4  \n5  \n6  \n7  \n8  \n9  \n10  \n11  \n12  \n13  \n14  \n15  \n16  \n17  \n18  \n19  \n20  \n21  \n22  \n23  \n24  \n25  \n26  \n27  \n28  \nPlaintiffs Lana Rae Renna, Danielle Jaymes, Hannah Spousta, Laura Schwartz, Michael Schwartz, Richard Bailey, John Klier, Justin Smith, John Phillips, PWGG, L.P., Cheryl Prince, Darin Prince, North County Shooting Center, Inc., Ryan Peterson, Gunfighter Tactical, LLC, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., San Diego County Gun Owners PAC, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and Second Amendment Foundation (collectively “Plaintiffs”) , by and through counsel of record, bring this complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against the named Defendants, and allege as follows:  \nINTRODUCTION  \n1. This case, as in Duncan v. Becerra, [S.D.Cal. no. 3:17-cv-01017-BEN](S.D.Cal. no. 3:17-cv-01017-BEN)JLB, and the closely-related Miller, et al., v. Becerra, [S.D.Cal. no. 19-cv-1537-BEN](S.D.Cal. no. 19-cv-1537-BEN)  \n2  \nCOMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS; and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION,  \nPlaintiffs,  \nvs.  \nXAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; and LUIS LOPEZ, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms,  \nDefendants.  \nCase 3:20-cv-02190-DMS-DEB Document 1 Filed 11/10/20 PageID.3 Page 3 of 51  \n1  \n2  \n3  \n4  \n5  \n6  \n7  \n8  \n9  \n10  \n11  \n12  \n13  \n14  \n15  \n16  \n17  \n18  \n19  \n20  \n21  \n22  \n23  \n24  \n25  \n26  \n27  \n28  \n(JLB) , is a challenge to the State of California’s ban on the sale and personal construction of constitutionally protected arms in common use for lawful purposes.  \n2. “In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court provided a simple Second Amendment test in crystal clear language. It is a test that anyone can understand. The right to keep and bear arms is a right enjoyed by law-abiding citizens to have arms that are not unusual in common use for lawful purposes like self-defense.”Duncan v. Becerra, 366 F. Supp. 3d 1131, 1142 (S.D. Cal. 2019) (internal quotations omitted) (citing District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 624, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008)) .  \n3. The State of California’s “unsafe handgun” statutes, Cal. Penal Code §§ 31900, et seq. and 32000, et seq., personal manufacturing ban statute at Penal Code § 29182(e)(2), and Defendants’ regulations, policies, and practices enforcing the State’s regulatory scheme (collectively hereinafter referred to as “California’s Handgun Ban”)","cbCair7nk0fR6cyH","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCair7nk0fR6cyH","pdf",791250,51,"English","# Introduction\n## Parties","[{\"question\":\"What relief are the plaintiffs requesting in this complaint?\",\"answer\":\"Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief against the named defendants.\"},{\"question\":\"What legal challenge is being made in this case?\",\"answer\":\"The complaint challenges California’s ban on the sale and personal construction of constitutionally protected arms commonly used for lawful purposes.\"},{\"question\":\"Which laws and regulations does the complaint claim are responsible for the ban?\",\"answer\":\"The complaint cites California’s “unsafe handgun” statutes, related personal manufacturing ban provisions, and defendants’ regulations and enforcement practices collectively referred to as California’s Handgun Ban.\"}]","COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF - Complaint | PDF",1791010168,129]