[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-270043-105":59,"doc-detail-270043-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","complaint-for-injunctive-and-declaratory-relief-and-civil-penalties","Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Civil Penalties","","Environmental Research Center Inc. (ERC) brings a private attorney general action seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and civil penalties. The pleading alleges Blue Star Nutraceuticals Inc. and unnamed defendants violated California Proposition 65 by failing to provide a clear and reasonable warning before exposing consumers to lead. The complaint identifies “Subject Products” and alleges exposures exceed the applicable Maximum Allowable Dose Level, and requests court relief to remedy ongoing failures.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/complaint-for-injunctive-and-declaratory-relief-and-civil-penalties/270043/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/complaint-for-injunctive-and-declaratory-relief-and-civil-penalties/270043.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Blitz","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Who is the plaintiff in the complaint and what is its purpose?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The plaintiff is Environmental Research Center Inc. The complaint states ERC is dedicated to safeguarding the public from health hazards by reducing the use and misuse of toxic chemicals and facilitating a safe environment for consumers and employees.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What legal relief does the complaint seek?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, along with civil penalties, to remedy defendants’ ongoing failure to warn consumers as required under California Proposition 65.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"Which products and hazard are at issue under Proposition 65?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The complaint identifies “Subject Products” marketed and sold by Blue Star Nutraceuticals and alleges consumers were exposed to lead. It asserts the exposure levels exceed the applicable Maximum Allowable Dose Level and that a warning was required.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},270043,1789454576,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145},24464137899374,"https://us-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","From:Michael Freund  \nFax:15103710885  \nPage:7 ot 27  \n03/15/202110.25AM  \nTo:5102671546rcfax,com Fax:(510)267-1546  \n\n| Michacl Freund SBN 99687  \u003Cbr>Michael Freund &Associates  \u003Cbr>1919 Addison Strect.Suite 105  \u003Cbr>Berkeley,CA94704  \u003Cbr>Teiephone:(510)540-1992  \u003Cbr>Facsimilc:(510)371-088  \u003Cbr>Attorney for Plaintiff Environmental Research Cen  \u003Cbr>SUPERIOR COURTOF THE S  \u003Cbr>COUNTY OF A  \u003Cbr>ENVIRONMENTALRESEARCH CENTER  \u003Cbr>INC.a Califorria non-profit corporation  \u003Cbr>Plaintiff,  \u003Cbr>VS.  \u003Cbr>BLUE STAR NUTRACEUTICALS INC.and  \u003Cbr>DOES 1-100  \u003Cbr>Defendants,   | FILED BY FAX  \u003Cbr>ALAMEDA COUNTY  \u003Cbr>Marcn 15,2021  \u003Cbr>CLERK OF  \u003Cbr>THE SUPERIOR COURT  \u003Cbr>By Milagros Cortez,Depu  \u003Cbr>CASE NUMBER:  \u003Cbr>4  \u003Cbr>ter.Inc  \u003Cbr>RG2109176  \u003Cbr>TATEOF CALIFORNLA  \u003Cbr>LAMEDA  \u003Cbr>CASE NO.  \u003Cbr>COMPLAINTFOR INJUNCTIVr  \u003Cbr>AND DECLARATORY RELIEEAND  \u003Cbr>CIVIL PENALTUES  \u003Cbr>[Miscellaneous Civil Complaint(42)]  \u003Cbr>Proposition 65.Health&Safety Cud  \u003Cbr>Section 25249.5 et seq.]  \u003Cbr>by alieges  \u003Cbr>CTION  \u003Cbr>c.(hereinafter \"Plaintiff\"or \"ERC\")bring  \u003Cbr>d in the public interest pursuant to Health &  \u003Cbr> Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforeement  \u003Cbr>er sea.)also knoun ds\"ProDosition 65.  \u003Cbr>s must provide a“elear andreasonabl  \u003Cbr>ical knowr to the state to cause canceror  \u003Cbr>he State of California to cause canccr.birit  \u003Cbr>f⁸   |\n| --- | --- |\n| PlainuiffEnvironmental Research Center.Inc.here  \u003Cbr>1  \u003Cbr>INTRODU  \u003Cbr>1.Plaintiff Environmental Research Center,In  \u003Cbr>this action as a private attornev general enforcer an  \u003Cbr>Safery Code section 25249.7,subdivision(d).The  \u003Cbr>Act of 1986(Health&Satety Code section 25249.5  \u003Cbr>ncdates that businesses with ten or more emplovee  \u003Cbr>warning\"prior to cxposing any individual to a chem  \u003Cbr>reproductive toxIcity.Lead is a chemical known to t  \u003Cbr>___  Pageo   |  |\n| Complaintfar Injunctive and Declaratory Relicf and Civil Penalties   |  |\n\n1  \n2  \n3  \nry  \n4  \n5  \n6  \n7  \n8  \n9  \n10  \n11  \n12  \n13  \n14  \n15  \n16  \n17  \n18  \n19  \n20  \n21  \n22  \n23  \n24  \n25  \n26  \n27  \n28  \n\n| defects,and other reproductive harm.This Complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief  \u003Cbr>and civil penalties to remedy the ongoing failure of Defendants Blue Star Nutraceuticals Inc  \u003Cbr>(\"Blue Star Nutraceuticals\")and Does 1-100(hereinafter individually referred to as  \u003Cbr>“Defendant”or collectively as \"Defendants”),to warn consumers that they have been exposed  \u003Cbr>to lead from a number ofBlue Star Nutraceuticals'nutritional health products as set forth in  \u003Cbr>paragraph 3 at levels exceeding the applicable Maximum Allowable Dose Level(“MADL”)and  \u003Cbr>requiring a warning pursuant to Health &Safety Code section 25249.6.  \u003Cbr>I  \u003Cbr>PARTIES  \u003Cbr>2.Plaintiff ERC is a California non-profit corporation dedicated to,among other causes,  \u003Cbr>helping safeguard the public from health hazards by reducing the use and misuse of hazardous  \u003Cbr>and toxic chemicals,facilitating a safe environment for consumers and employees,and  \u003Cbr>encouraging corporate responsibility.  \u003Cbr>3.Defendant Blue Star Nutraceuticals is a business that develops,manufactures,markets,  \u003Cbr>distributes,and/or sells nutritional health products that have exposed users to lead in the State of  \u003Cbr>California within the relevant statute of limitations period.These“SUBJECT PRODUCTS”(as  \u003Cbr>identified in the Notice of Violation dated December 22,2020 attached hereto as Exhibit A)  \u003Cbr>are:(1)Blue Star Nutraceuticals Better By Design Post-Factor Chocolate Truffle,(2)Blue Star  \u003Cbr>Nutraceuticals Better By Design Roughage Mojito,(3)Blue Star Nutraceuticals Better By  \u003Cbr>Design P.P.K.Lemon Bomb,(4)Blue Star Nutraceuticals Better By Design Shake One  \u003Cbr>Complete Morning Formula Double Chocolate,and (5)Blue Star Nutraceuticals Better By  \u003Cbr>Design Shake One Complete Morning Formula Mocha.Blue Star Nutraceuticals Inc.is a  \u003Cbr>company subject to Proposition 65 as it employs ten or more persons and has employed ten or  \u003Cbr>more persons at alltimes relevant","cbCait0XlFVVSYKf","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCait0XlFVVSYKf","pdf",12796555,21,"English","# Parties\n## Plaintiff Environmental Research Center\n## Defendant Blue Star Nutraceuticals and Does 1-100\n# Jurisdiction and Venue\n## Court jurisdiction basis\n## Minimum contacts and market activity\n# Allegations and Notice of Violation\n## Notice dated December 22, 2020","[{\"question\":\"Who is the plaintiff in the complaint and what is its purpose?\",\"answer\":\"The plaintiff is Environmental Research Center Inc. The complaint states ERC is dedicated to safeguarding the public from health hazards by reducing the use and misuse of toxic chemicals and facilitating a safe environment for consumers and employees.\"},{\"question\":\"What legal relief does the complaint seek?\",\"answer\":\"The complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, along with civil penalties, to remedy defendants’ ongoing failure to warn consumers as required under California Proposition 65.\"},{\"question\":\"Which products and hazard are at issue under Proposition 65?\",\"answer\":\"The complaint identifies “Subject Products” marketed and sold by Blue Star Nutraceuticals and alleges consumers were exposed to lead. It asserts the exposure levels exceed the applicable Maximum Allowable Dose Level and that a warning was required.\"}]","Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Civil Penalties | PDF",53]