[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-601845-105":59,"doc-detail-601845-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","competing-and-contested-discourses-on-citizenship-and-civic-praxis-research-article","Competing and Contested Discourses on Citizenship and Civic Praxis - Research Article","","Utilizing complementary features of critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT), the study traces how power, materiality, and reproduction operate within notions of citizenship and civic engagement. It examines conservative Arizona political and public discourses that shape civics education policy, then contrasts them with youth-driven enactments of citizenship through language materials that challenge authoritative civic narratives, especially in online settings. Drawing on textual and discursive data from Arizona, it argues that youth develop critical but often unrecognized and undervalued forms of online civic engagement that can inform formal civic education curricula.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/competing-and-contested-discourses-on-citizenship-and-civic-praxis-research-article/601845/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/competing-and-contested-discourses-on-citizenship-and-civic-praxis-research-article/601845.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"ahduag","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-04","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Which methods does the paper use to analyze citizenship and civic engagement?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It combines critical discourse analysis (CDA) with Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to trace power, materiality, and reproduction within citizenship and civic engagement notions.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the paper address differences between conservative civic discourse and youth civic enactment?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It contrasts narrow, conservative political and public discourses in Arizona with youth practices where young people use, produce, and share language materials to counter authoritative citizenship and civic discourses, particularly online.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What relationship does the paper examine between civics education policy and Latino youth online practices?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It explores how civic education policy and discursive enactments of citizenship relate to Latino youth’s online civic practices, arguing that these youth forms of engagement are often unrecognized and undervalued but could be incorporated into formal curricula.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},601845,1792119738,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747870414,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","SPECIAL ISSUE  \nCONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF EDUCATION POLICY & DISCOURSE  \neducation policy analysis archives  \nA peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal  \nArizona State University  \n\n| Volume 25 Number 28 | March 27, 2017 | ISSN 1068-2341 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n\nCompeting and Contested Discourses on Citizenship and  \nCivic Praxis  \nJill Koyama  \nUniversity of Arizona  \nUnited States  \nCitation: Koyama, J. (2017) . Competing and contested discourses on citizenship and civic praxis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(28). [http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2730](http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2730 This)[ This](http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2730 This) article is in the second in a two-part Special Issue, Contemporary Approaches to the Study of Education Policy and Discourse, guest edited by Jessica Nina Lester, Chad Lochmiller, and Rachael Gabriel.  \nAbstract: In this paper, I utilize complementary features of critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to trace and investigate issues of power, materiality, and reproduction embedded within notions of citizenship and civic engagement. I interrogate the often narrow and conservative political and public discourses in Arizona that inform civics education policy. To these, I juxtapose the enactment of citizenship by youth who use, produce, and share language materials and counter authoritative citizenship and civic discourses, especially, but not exclusively, in online contexts. I explore the questions: In what ways are discourses of civic engagement and citizenship assembled, interpreted, understood, enacted, and contested in Arizona? What are the relationships between civic education policy, discursive enactments of citizenship, and Latino youth’s online civic practices? I draw on a mixture of textual (language materials) and discursive (events, acts, and practices) data collected in Arizona to argue that youth are doing critical,  \nyet unrecognized and undervalued, forms of civic engagement online, which could be incorporated in the formal civic education curriculum.  \nKeywords: citizenship; civic engagement; Actor-Network Theory; critical discourse analysis; Latinos  \nDiscursos competentes y contestables sobre la ciudadanía y la praxis cívica  \nResumen: En este artículo se recomienda su uso para el análisis crítico del discurso (ACD) y el Actor-Network Theory (ANT) para investigar cuestiones de poder, la materialidad y lareproducción Dentro de las nociones de ciudadano, y el compromiso cívico. Interrogo la estrecha ya menudo lo hacen discursos políticos y públicos conservadores de Arizona que informen a la política de educación cívica. Estos comparo a la promulgación de la ciudadaníapor los jóvenes que usar, producir, y materiales en acción y contra la ciudadanía autorizada y discursos cívicos, especialmente en contextos en línea. Exploro las preguntas: ¿De qué manera son discursos de compromiso cívico y la ciudadanía montado, interpretado, entendido, promulgada y controvertida en Arizona? ¿Cuáles son las relaciones entre la política de educacióncívica, representaciones discursivas de la ciudadanía, y las prácticas cívicas en línea de los jóvenes latinos? Yo uso de texto(idioma) y discursivas (eventos, actos y prácticas) los datos recogidos en Arizona para discutir la juventud que están haciendo formas críticas de cívica Que la participación en línea no es reconocido o valorado y podrían incorporarse en el plan deestudios oficial de educación cívica.  \nPalabras-clave: ciudadanía; el compromiso cívico; Actor-Network Theory; análisis crítico del discurso, los latinos  \nDiscursos concorrentes e contestados sobre a cidadania ea práxis cívica  \nResumo: Neste artigo, vamos utilizar para a análise crítica do discurso (CDA) e da ActorTheory Network (ANT) para investigar questões de poder, materialidade e reprodução dentrodas noções de cidadania e participação cívica é recomendado. Interrogar o próximo e muitas vezes os ","cbCaigEp57LyljwS","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigEp57LyljwS","pdf",496594,27,"English","# Introduction\n## Citizenship, civic participation, and civic learning as discursive practice","[{\"question\":\"Which methods does the paper use to analyze citizenship and civic engagement?\",\"answer\":\"It combines critical discourse analysis (CDA) with Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to trace power, materiality, and reproduction within citizenship and civic engagement notions.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the paper address differences between conservative civic discourse and youth civic enactment?\",\"answer\":\"It contrasts narrow, conservative political and public discourses in Arizona with youth practices where young people use, produce, and share language materials to counter authoritative citizenship and civic discourses, particularly online.\"},{\"question\":\"What relationship does the paper examine between civics education policy and Latino youth online practices?\",\"answer\":\"It explores how civic education policy and discursive enactments of citizenship relate to Latino youth’s online civic practices, arguing that these youth forms of engagement are often unrecognized and undervalued but could be incorporated into formal curricula.\"}]","Competing and Contested Discourses on Citizenship and Civic Praxis - Research Article | PDF",1792093531,68]