[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31434":3,"doc-seo-31434":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31434,3848291630094,"Emma Wilson","https://eur-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45",7,"Healthcare","Comparison of Traditional Growth Rods and Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods in Early-Onset Scoliosis","Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) requires timely surgical management to control curve progression and support full lung development. Traditional growth rods (TGR) and magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are widely used, yet limited long-term evidence remains for MCGR. This case-matched mid-term retrospective study compares TGR versus MCGR effectiveness, matching etiologic and clinical factors, surgical complications, and pre-operative radiological parameters. Outcomes assess correction and growth-related lengthening while accounting for invasive versus non-invasive procedures.","cbCaii6MZDXC1XNl","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaii6MZDXC1XNl","pdf",1147137,1,9,"English","en","# Abstract\n# Introduction\n# Materials and methods\n# Results\n# Conclusion","[{\"question\":\"What is the study’s primary purpose when comparing TGR and MCGR for early-onset scoliosis?\",\"answer\":\"To compare the effectiveness of traditional growth rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods in treating early-onset scoliosis, focusing on curve control and growth-related outcomes.\"},{\"question\":\"How were patients selected and matched between the TGR and MCGR groups?\",\"answer\":\"Patients treated with either TGR or MCGR were included, while those managed by other methods or with follow-up under 2 years were excluded. Groups were case-matched by etiology, gender, pre-operative radiological parameters, and complications including unplanned surgeries.\"},{\"question\":\"What differences were observed in invasive procedures and unplanned surgeries between the two groups?\",\"answer\":\"TGR required substantially more open lengthening surgeries and more unplanned surgeries, while MCGR achieved lengthening predominantly non-invasively with fewer returns to the operating theater for unplanned causes.\"}]",1779483669,23,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"comparison-of-traditional-growth-rods-and-magnetically-controlled-growing-rods-in-early-onset-scoliosis","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparison-of-traditional-growth-rods-and-magnetically-controlled-growing-rods-in-early-onset-scoliosis/31434/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What is the study’s primary purpose when comparing TGR and MCGR for early-onset scoliosis?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"To compare the effectiveness of traditional growth rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods in treating early-onset scoliosis, focusing on curve control and growth-related outcomes.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How were patients selected and matched between the TGR and MCGR groups?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Patients treated with either TGR or MCGR were included, while those managed by other methods or with follow-up under 2 years were excluded. Groups were case-matched by etiology, gender, pre-operative radiological parameters, and complications including unplanned surgeries.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What differences were observed in invasive procedures and unplanned surgeries between the two groups?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"TGR required substantially more open lengthening surgeries and more unplanned surgeries, while MCGR achieved lengthening predominantly non-invasively with fewer returns to the operating theater for unplanned causes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]