[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-597670-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-597670-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","comparison-of-student-experiences-with-different-online-graduate-courses-in-health-promotion-article","Comparison of Student Experiences with Different Online Graduate Courses in Health Promotion - Article","","Study examining how graduate students experienced three specific online courses in health promotion studies delivered mainly via asynchronous computer conferencing. Focused teleconferences were held with approximately 45 students across the different courses, and transcripts were analyzed qualitatively. Emerging themes include what new learners valued most when adapting to online learning, what drove learner satisfaction, and challenges when course content mismatched the instructional method. Results are discussed using the Community of Inquiry model (cognitive, social, teacher presence).",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparison-of-student-experiences-with-different-online-graduate-courses-in-health-promotion-article/597670/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparison-of-student-experiences-with-different-online-graduate-courses-in-health-promotion-article/597670.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"pop out","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What was the goal of the study on online health promotion courses?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"To understand how students experienced three specific online graduate courses in health promotion studies as they progressed through their programs.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How were student experiences collected and analyzed?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Focused teleconference discussions were conducted with about 45 students, and the transcripts were subjected to qualitative analysis.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Which framework was used to interpret the course comparison findings?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The findings were discussed using Garrison, Anderson and Archer’s (2000) Community of Inquiry model, focusing on cognitive, social, and teacher presence.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},597670,1792192306,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":55,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962090760408,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology Volume 31 ( 1 ) Winter / hiver 2005  \nComparison of Student Experiences with Different Online Graduate Courses in Health Promotion  \nVarnhagen  \nDouglas Wilson  \nEugene Krupa  \nSusan Kasprzak  \nHunting Hunting  \nAuthors  \nStanley Varnhagen is Manager of Evaluation Research, Faculty of Extension, University of Alberta . Contact: stanley.varnhagen@ucalgary.ca  \nDouglas Wilson is Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and the Centre for Health Promotion Studies, University of Alberta .  \nEugene Krupa is Online Program Coordinator, Centre for Health Promotion Studies, University of Alberta .  \nSusan Kasprzak is currently a Master’s student, Faculty of Arts, Carleton University .  \nVali Hunting is currently a Master’s student, Faculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria .  \nAbstract  \nThe purpose of this study was to understand the experience of students as they progressed through three specific online graduate courses in health promotion studies delivered primarily by asynchronous computer conferencing. Focused teleconference discussions were conducted with approximately 45 students from the different courses and the transcripts subjected to qualitative analysis . Themes that emerged included what new students appreciated most when adapting to learning online, factors that contributed to learner satisfaction, and the difficulties encountered by students taking a course when the content was not as well suited to the instructional method. The findings are discussed in relation to the three components of Garrison, Anderson and Archer’s (2000) Community of Inquiry model of learning: cognitive, social and teacher presence .  \nImplications are presented for assisting students with the process of adapting to online learning and enhancing the‘fit ’ between course content and online instructional methods .  \nRé sumé : L’objet de l’étude consiste à comprend re l’expé rience des étudiants alors qu’ils suivaient en ligne trois cours donné s aux études supé rieures dans le domaine de la promotion de la santé , cours donné s principalement au moyen de conférences informatis é es asynchrones . Par la suite, on a discuté de t éléconférences avec environ 45 étudiants des différents cours et les transcriptions ont fait l’objet d’analyses quantitatives .  \nLes points saillants comprennent ce que les nouveaux étudiants appré cient par dessus tout lorsqu’ils s ’adaptent aux cours en ligne, les facteurs qui contribuent à la satisfaction de l’apprenant et les difficult é s auxquelles ontdû faire face les étudiants qui ont pris un cours alors que son contenu n’était pas approprié à la méthode d’enseignement. On discute des conclusions relativement aux trois composantes du Community of Inquiry model of learning de Garrison, Anderson et Archer (2000) , c ’est à dire l’élémentcognitif, l’élément social et la pré sence de l’enseignant. On pré sente les ré percussions afin d’aider les étudiants à s ’adapter à l’apprentissage en ligne et d’améliorer l’é quilibre entre le contenu de cours et les méthodes d’enseignement en ligne .  \nIntroduction  \nComputer mediated communication ( CMC) is rapidly gaining wide use in higher education. Asynchronous computer conferencing, in particular, is recognized as an important method of delivering educational programs on an‘anytime, anywhere ’ basis . Research aimed at better defining the key elements of computer conferencing that contribute to a successful learning experience, is extensive and ongoing ( cf. Dykes & Schwier, 2003; Hiltz, Coppola, Rotter, & Turoff, 2000; Kennedy, 2002; Rourke, Anderson, Garrison, & Archer, 1999; Schwier & Balbar, 2002; Stacey, 1999) .  \nThe literature provides numerous examples of student experiences with online learning in a single course ( cf., Dykes & Schwier, 2003; Hong, Lai, & Holton, 2003; Schwier & Balbar, 2002) or several courses examined together ( cf., Burge, 1994; Hatch, 2001; Hiltz, et al., 2000; Hurlbur","cbCaiaBetjmoP9Zc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaBetjmoP9Zc","pdf",401823,17,"English","# Abstract\n# Introduction\n## Communication in Higher Education (CMC)\n## Prior Research on Online Learning\n## Purpose and Study Design\n## Community of Inquiry Framework","[{\"question\":\"What was the goal of the study on online health promotion courses?\",\"answer\":\"To understand how students experienced three specific online graduate courses in health promotion studies as they progressed through their programs.\"},{\"question\":\"How were student experiences collected and analyzed?\",\"answer\":\"Focused teleconference discussions were conducted with about 45 students, and the transcripts were subjected to qualitative analysis.\"},{\"question\":\"Which framework was used to interpret the course comparison findings?\",\"answer\":\"The findings were discussed using Garrison, Anderson and Archer’s (2000) Community of Inquiry model, focusing on cognitive, social, and teacher presence.\"}]","Comparison of Student Experiences with Different Online Graduate Courses in Health Promotion - Article | PDF",1792085471,43]