[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31058":3,"doc-seo-31058":22},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"update_tm":21},31058,13056703019662,"Evangeline","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253a8e92610077?_k=1778726343310543188",8,"Research & Report","Windows Mobile智能手机取证证据恢复技术对比","Mobile device data acquisition, decoding, and presentation face heightened complexity because device memory is typically integrated with other components, making isolation prior to recovery difficult. Diverse manufacturer file systems and data formats further complicate faithful decoding and visualization. While commercial and open-source tools support mobile forensics, consistency and completeness of recovered information remain uncertain. This paper evaluates which information from a Windows Mobile smartphone can be recovered via multiple acquisition and decoding approaches, showing that no single technique retrieves all potentially relevant evidence and that recovered artifacts may conflict.","cbCailfI0MT3fX3v","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailfI0MT3fX3v","pdf",1540647,2,1,1778533354,{"code":4,"msg":23,"data":24},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":26,"slug":27,"title":13,"keywords":28,"description":14,"schema_data":29,"social_meta":63,"head_meta":65,"extra_data":67,"updated_unix":21},105,"en","comparison-of-forensic-evidence-recovery-techniques-for-a-windows-mobile-smartphone","",{"@graph":30,"@context":62},[31,47],{"@type":32,"itemListElement":33},"BreadcrumbList",[34,38,41,44],{"item":35,"name":36,"@type":37,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":37,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":42,"name":12,"@type":37,"position":43},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":45,"name":13,"@type":37,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparison-of-forensic-evidence-recovery-techniques-for-a-windows-mobile-smartphone/31058",4,{"url":45,"name":13,"@type":48,"author":49,"headline":13,"publisher":51,"fileFormat":54,"description":14,"dateModified":55,"datePublished":56,"encodingFormat":54,"isAccessibleForFree":57,"interactionStatistic":58},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":50},"Person",{"url":35,"name":52,"@type":53},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-14","2026-05-11",true,{"@type":59,"interactionType":60,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":61},"ViewAction","https://schema.org",{"og:url":45,"og:type":64,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":52,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":66,"canonical":45},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25}]