[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-584491-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-584491-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","comparing-kansas-2017-supplement-methods-and-data-used-student-outcomes","Comparing Kansas 2017 Supplement - Methods and Data Used - Student Outcomes","","A companion report comparing Kansas with relevant state groups on key demographic and education-related variables for 2017, linking patterns that may influence student outcomes beyond school funding. It introduces the scope of the supplement, explains the statistical methods and national data sources used, and defines multiple peer group categories (aspiration, adjacent, student peers, adult peers, distribution peers, and overall peers). The appendix provides detailed tables supporting outcomes and funding results.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparing-kansas-2017-supplement-methods-and-data-used-student-outcomes/584491/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparing-kansas-2017-supplement-methods-and-data-used-student-outcomes/584491.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"WPS_1786070896","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the Comparing Kansas 2017 Supplement?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It provides comparisons between Kansas and selected state groups on key demographic variables and supports how factors outside school funding may affect student outcomes.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How are peer groups like Aspiration and Adjacent defined in the report?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Aspiration states are those performing better overall than Kansas using ranked weighted averages across Postsecondary, High School Graduation, and Assessment measures; Adjacent states are those that share a border with Kansas.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What information is included in the appendix?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The appendix contains detailed tables for student outcomes, including aspiration status, rank changes, age (18-24) status and change, graduation status and change, NAEP status and change, and ACT/SAT status and change.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},584491,1792101754,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},549768072016,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Comparing Kansas 2017 Supplement  \nTed Carter, KASB Research Specialist September, 2017  \nIntroduction  \nThis report provides comparisons between Kansas and relevant state groups on key demographic variables. It is a companion piece to the KASB Comparing Kansas 2017 report that helps show how factors outside of school funding may have an impact on student outcomes for each state. In addition, the Appendix contains the detailed tables supporting the summary information on student outcomes and funding as included in the Comparing Kansas report.  \nContents  \nIntroduction .................................................................................................... 1  \nMethods and Data Used ................................................................................. 2  \nAspiration: ................................................................................................... 2  \nAdjacent: ..................................................................................................... 2  \nStudent Peers: ............................................................................................. 2  \nAdult Peers: ................................................................................................. 2  \nDistribution Peers: ...................................................................................... 2  \nOverall Peers: .............................................................................................. 2  \nTable One: Students ........................................................................................ 3  \nTable Two: Adults............................................................................................ 5  \nTable Three: Distribution ................................................................................ 7  \nTable Four: Schools ....................................................................................... 10  \nTable Five: Teacher Salaries .......................................................................... 12  \nTable Six: School Spending............................................................................ 14  \nTable Seven: School Spending Allocation ..................................................... 17  \nAppendix: Student Outcomes ....................................................................... 19  \nTable A: Aspiration Status ......................................................................... 19  \nTable B: Aspiration Status and School Funding......................................... 21  \nTable C: Rank Changes Part 1 .................................................................... 23  \nTable D: Rank Changes Part 2 ................................................................... 25  \nTable E: 18‐24 Status................................................................................. 27  \nTable F: 18‐24 Change............................................................................... 29  \nTable G: Grad Status ................................................................................. 30  \nTable H: Grad Change ............................................................................... 32  \nTable I: NAEP Status .................................................................................. 34  \nTable J: NAEP Change................................................................................ 35  \nTable K: ACT, SAT Status ........................................................................... 37  \nTable L: ACT Change .................................................................................. 38  \nTable M: SAT Change ................................................................................ 40  \nSources .......................................................................................................... 42  \nKASB Comparing Kansas 2017 Supplement Page 1 of 43  \nMethods and Data Used  \nThis report contains state‐level statistics gathered from a variety of national data sources.","cbCaioMozwhNoUMh","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaioMozwhNoUMh","pdf",565047,43,"English","# Introduction\n# Methods and Data Used\n## Aspiration\n## Adjacent\n## Student Peers\n## Adult Peers\n## Distribution Peers\n## Overall Peers\n# Tables (Students, Adults, Distribution, Schools, Teacher Salaries, Spending, Allocation)\n# Appendix: Student Outcomes\n# Sources","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Comparing Kansas 2017 Supplement?\",\"answer\":\"It provides comparisons between Kansas and selected state groups on key demographic variables and supports how factors outside school funding may affect student outcomes.\"},{\"question\":\"How are peer groups like Aspiration and Adjacent defined in the report?\",\"answer\":\"Aspiration states are those performing better overall than Kansas using ranked weighted averages across Postsecondary, High School Graduation, and Assessment measures; Adjacent states are those that share a border with Kansas.\"},{\"question\":\"What information is included in the appendix?\",\"answer\":\"The appendix contains detailed tables for student outcomes, including aspiration status, rank changes, age (18-24) status and change, graduation status and change, NAEP status and change, and ACT/SAT status and change.\"}]","Comparing Kansas 2017 Supplement - Methods and Data Used - Student Outcomes | PDF",1792051171,108]