[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-593046-105":59,"doc-detail-593046-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","comparing-collaborative-writing-activity-in-efl-classroom-face-to-face-collaborative-writing-versus-online-collaborative-writing-using-google-docs","Comparing Collaborative Writing Activity in EFL Classroom - Face-to-Face Collaborative Writing versus Online Collaborative Writing Using Google Docs","","Collaborative writing is examined as an effective writing exercise for EFL learners through a comparison of online collaborative writing via Google Docs and face-to-face collaborative writing. The study identifies and categorizes errors based on Norrish’s (1983) framework and evaluates student satisfaction using a record form, questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews. Results show more errors in face-to-face mode, with different dominant error types. Students report higher satisfaction and value time independence and Google Docs features.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparing-collaborative-writing-activity-in-efl-classroom-face-to-face-collaborative-writing-versus-online-collaborative-writing-using-google-docs/593046/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparing-collaborative-writing-activity-in-efl-classroom-face-to-face-collaborative-writing-versus-online-collaborative-writing-using-google-docs/593046.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aran","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What was the purpose of comparing the two collaborative writing modes?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"To analyze errors in online collaborative writing using Google Docs and face-to-face collaborative writing, and to determine how satisfied students were with both modes.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which mode produced more total errors, and what were the most common error types?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Face-to-face mode produced more errors (389) than online mode (346). Sentence fragments were most common in the online mode, while determiners were most common in the face-to-face mode.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How did students rate their satisfaction with each mode?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Students reported higher satisfaction with the online mode using Google Docs (X̄ = 3.50), followed by face-to-face setting (X̄ = 3.45), with overall positive feedback on Google Docs for writing anywhere and anytime.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},593046,1792161791,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":41,"preview_page_count":4},137455076865,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","Asian Journal of Education and Training  \nVol. 7, No. 4, 204-215, 2021 ISSN(E) 2519-5387  \nDOI: 10.20448/journal.522.2021 .74.204.215  \n© 2021 by the authors; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group  \nComparing Collaborative Writing Activity in EFL Classroom: Face-to-Face Collaborative Writing versus Online Collaborative Writing Using Google Docs  \nJitlada Moonma   \nThe Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang, Thailand.  \nEmail: j[itlada.moon@gmail.com](itlada.moon@gmail.com)  \nAbstract  \nCollaborative writing is acknowledged as one of the most beneficial writing exercises for  \nimproving writing skills. This study aimed to look at the errors of online collaborative writing  \nusing Google Docs and face-to-face collaborative writing, as well as to find out how satisfied  \nstudents were with both modes. Purposive sampling was used to pick 32 Thai second-year  \nEnglish major students (19 females, 13 males) from Writing II. A record form of the error kinds  \nderived from Norrish (1983) a questionnaire, and a semi-structured interview were used as  \ninstruments. Frequency and percentage were the statistics used. The data revealed that 346 errors  \nwere discovered in online mode, while 389 errors were discovered in face-to-face mode, which was  \nat a higher level. The most common types in the online mode were sentence fragments, while the  \nmost common kinds in the face-to-face mode were determiners. Grammars were presented to  \nstudents in both modes, followed by lexis and mechanics. Furthermore, the findings indicated that  \n̅  \nthe students reported being highly satisfied with online mode using Google Docs (X = 3.50),  \n̅  \nfollowed by face-to-face setting (X = 3.45) . Students also had an overall positive feedback on  \nGoogle Docs and found it useful in terms of writing anywhere and anytime. Based on the results  \nof this study, students in online co-produced texts better than in face-to-face mode. Time  \nindependence and features of Google Docs might be the crucial factors which facilitated the  \nstudents’ writing in online mode.  \nKeywords: Collaborative writing, Collaborative writing activity, Face-to-face writing, Online collaborative writing, Google docs, Students’satisfaction.  \nCitation | Jitlada Moonma (2021). Comparing Collaborative Writing Activity in EFL Classroom: Face-to-Face Collaborative Writing versus Online Collaborative Writing Using Google Docs. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(4): 204-215.  \nHistory:  \nReceived: 19 July 2021  \nRevised: 23 August 2021  \nAccepted: 9 September 2021  \nPublished: 27 September 2021  \nLicensed: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License   \nPublisher: Asian Online Journal Publishing Group  \nFunding: The research project is supported by The Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang, Thailand. Competing Interests: The author declares that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.  \nTransparency: The author confirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study was reported; that no vital features of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.  \nEthical: This study follows all ethical practices during writing.  \nContents  \n1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................... 205  \n2. Literature Review .......................................................................................................................................................................... 206  \n4. Results .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 210  \n5. Discussion......","cbCaigwRYuSk4rIo","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigwRYuSk4rIo","pdf",325794,12,"English","# Introduction\n# Literature Review\n# Results\n# Discussion\n# Conclusion\n# Suggestions for Future Studies\n# References","[{\"question\":\"What was the purpose of comparing the two collaborative writing modes?\",\"answer\":\"To analyze errors in online collaborative writing using Google Docs and face-to-face collaborative writing, and to determine how satisfied students were with both modes.\"},{\"question\":\"Which mode produced more total errors, and what were the most common error types?\",\"answer\":\"Face-to-face mode produced more errors (389) than online mode (346). Sentence fragments were most common in the online mode, while determiners were most common in the face-to-face mode.\"},{\"question\":\"How did students rate their satisfaction with each mode?\",\"answer\":\"Students reported higher satisfaction with the online mode using Google Docs (X̄ = 3.50), followed by face-to-face setting (X̄ = 3.45), with overall positive feedback on Google Docs for writing anywhere and anytime.\"}]","Comparing Collaborative Writing Activity in EFL Classroom - Face-to-Face Collaborative Writing versus Online Collaborative Writing Using Google Docs | PDF",1792076484]