[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-441845-105":59,"doc-detail-441845-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","comparing-autologous-breast-reconstruction-in-high-vs-low-body-mass-index-patients","Comparing autologous breast reconstruction in high vs. low body mass index patients","","Breast reconstruction is linked to improved quality of life after mastectomy, and autologous approaches can outperform implant-based methods in quality-of-life and satisfaction outcomes. Patient body mass index (BMI) may alter preoperative planning and downstream results, including complication profiles and overall satisfaction. This retrospective cohort stratified patients by CDC BMI categories (healthy, overweight, obese) to evaluate how BMI influenced flap selection and complications in autologous reconstruction.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/comparing-autologous-breast-reconstruction-in-high-vs-low-body-mass-index-patients/441845/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/comparing-autologous-breast-reconstruction-in-high-vs-low-body-mass-index-patients/441845.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Chumphorn","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How were patients grouped for the analysis?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Patients undergoing autologous reconstruction were stratified into BMI categories using CDC definitions: healthy (18.5≤BMI\u003C25), overweight (25≤BMI\u003C30), and obese (BMI≥30).","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What differences in flap reconstruction were observed across BMI groups?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The study found significant differences in flap type selection across BMI subgroups, including variations in the incidence of specific perforator-based flaps such as DIEPs, PAPs, and LAPs, as well as differences in the proportion of multi-flap procedures.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What complication patterns were reported by BMI category?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Postoperative complication rates differed significantly between groups, with higher incidence in the obese subgroup for breast and donor-site complications such as infection, seroma, and wound-related events.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},441845,1790742294,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},2336475401981,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c94efd8d5204d?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786935347598174694","Comparing autologous breast reconstruction in high vs. low body mass index patients  \nColin G. White-Dzuro^, Nicholas T. Haddock^  \nDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA  \nContributions: (I) Conception and design: Both authors; (II) Administrative support: Both authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Both authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Both authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Both authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: Both authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: Both authors.  \nCorrespondence to: Nicholas T. Haddock, MD. Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1801 Inwood  \nRoad, Dallas, TX 75390-8593, [USA. Email: Nicholas.Haddock@utsouthwestern.edu](USA. Email: Nicholas.Haddock@utsouthwestern.edu).  \nBackground: Breast reconstruction has been shown to significantly improve quality of life (QoL) for women who must undergo mastectomy. Between the implant-based and autologous-based reconstruction, autologous-based reconstruction has demonstrated better outcomes in both QoL and overall satisfaction as reported by the BREAST-Q. For patients desiring autologous reconstruction, a woman’s weight and body habitus can affect not only the pre-operative planning, but also outcomes in terms of both complications as well as overall satisfaction. Here, we present our cohort that has been stratified by body mass index (BMI)  \nand compare how BMI can influence flap selection as well as complications.  \nMethods: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review in a REDCap database-guided analysis was conducted of patients who underwent autologous reconstruction with longitudinal follow-up ata single academic institution from 2013 to 2024. Patients were then stratified into BMI categories as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) including healthy (18 .5≤ BMI \u003C25 kg/m2), overweight (25≤ BMI \u003C30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) . Data were then obtained and the subgroups were compared.  \nStatistical significance was set at a P value less than 0.05 for all tests. Pearson Chi-squared tests were used to compare flap types, categorical comorbidities, and complications across the groups, and one-way analysis of  \nvariance (ANOVA) was used to compare average length of surgery.  \nResults: A total of 957 patients were identified who fit the inclusion criteria, with 239 patients sorted into the healthy (18 .5≤ BMI \u003C25 kg/m2) subgroup, 348 patients into the overweight (25≤ BMI \u003C30 kg/m2) subgroup, and 370 patients into the obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) subgroup. There were significant differences in comorbid conditions between the groups including diabetes and hypertension (P\u003C0.05), with the incidence of these comorbidities increasing from healthy to overweight to obese subgroups. The rate of multi-flap procedures was significantly higher in the Healthy subgroup (33.9%) as compared to the overweight (23.3%) and obese (11.6%) subgroups (P\u003C0.05) . There was a significant difference in the type of flaps used between the subgroups (P\u003C0.05), as well as in the incidence of deep inferior epigastric perforators (DIEPs), profunda artery perforators, and lumbar artery perforators between the subgroups (P\u003C0.05) . There was a significant difference found for incidence of flap site infection (P\u003C0.05), seroma (P\u003C0.05), and wound (P\u003C0.05), as well as in overall donor site complications (P\u003C0.05) between the subgroups, with a greater incidence occurring  \nwithin the obese subgroup as compared to the overweight or healthy subgroups.  \nConclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, we found that patients with healthy BMI are more likely to undergo multi-flap or non-abdominally based flap reconstruction and less frequently rely on DIEP flaps than women of overweight or obese BMI. Furthermore, patients with obese BMI are more likely to have post-operative complications at either the breast or donor site.","cbCaisVOY1lhKZnd","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaisVOY1lhKZnd","pdf",226624,"English","# Introduction\n# Methods\n# Results\n# Conclusions\n# Highlight box","[{\"question\":\"How were patients grouped for the analysis?\",\"answer\":\"Patients undergoing autologous reconstruction were stratified into BMI categories using CDC definitions: healthy (18.5≤BMI\\u003c25), overweight (25≤BMI\\u003c30), and obese (BMI≥30).\"},{\"question\":\"What differences in flap reconstruction were observed across BMI groups?\",\"answer\":\"The study found significant differences in flap type selection across BMI subgroups, including variations in the incidence of specific perforator-based flaps such as DIEPs, PAPs, and LAPs, as well as differences in the proportion of multi-flap procedures.\"},{\"question\":\"What complication patterns were reported by BMI category?\",\"answer\":\"Postoperative complication rates differed significantly between groups, with higher incidence in the obese subgroup for breast and donor-site complications such as infection, seroma, and wound-related events.\"}]","Comparing autologous breast reconstruction in high vs. low body mass index patients | PDF",1790697791,18]